Just watched Fitzgerald's news conference. He is just a hack for the
Justice Department Dems. Did he get an indictment for the outing? Did he
prosecute the illegal politicking by the husband and wife? He is
motivated by the Dems stereotyping of all Republicans. He IS a Democrat
out to damage the current administration.

--
Skipper

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:37:22 -0500, Skipper wrote:

He IS a Democrat
out to damage the current administration.

Who needs a democrat to do that? Seems the administration is doing a
fine job all on it's own.

bb

In article , says...

Just watched Fitzgerald's news conference. He is just a hack for the
Justice Department Dems. Did he get an indictment for the outing? Did he
prosecute the illegal politicking by the husband and wife? He is
motivated by the Dems stereotyping of all Republicans. He IS a Democrat
out to damage the current administration.

Hey, a Dem who regularly votes Republican.

Could it be Bill McKee and Patrick Fitzgerald are the same person?

Snippy, it's time to bury your head in your latest issue of White Power
and leave justice to those charged with upholding the law.

jps

jps wrote:

Snippy, leave justice to those charged with upholding the law.

The DOJ does not uphold the law, they abuse it. Fitzgerald is a good
example of DOJ "justice". He just ruined a man and his family and has no
shame.

--
Skipper

Skipper wrote:
jps wrote:

Snippy, leave justice to those charged with upholding the law.

The DOJ does not uphold the law, they abuse it. Fitzgerald is a good
example of DOJ "justice". He just ruined a man and his family and has no
shame.

--
Skipper

Would you say that a judge who charges anybody else with a crime has no
shame? After all, every day in the U.S. a judge charges, and convicts
people, who in turn, gets "ruined", as well as his family.

Harry Krause wrote:

Perjury, false statements, and obstruction on matters more important
than semen stains on a blue dress necessitates charges and a trial.

The man is looking at 30 years for not making accurate statements. How
many years should one get for lying about a lobster boat?

--
Skipper

wrote:

Would you say that a judge who charges anybody else with a crime has no
shame?

The judge assigned this case is a well know Dem political hack. Most
Dems are without shame, particularly when referring to stains on blue
dresses.

--
Skipper

Harry Krause wrote:

The DOJ does not uphold the law, they abuse it. Fitzgerald is a good
example of DOJ "justice". He just ruined a man and his family and has no
shame.

Libby has been charged with a number of serious offenses. If the case
against him goes to trial, he'll either be exonerated or convicted.

"Either exonerated or convicted"??? The man has been ruined no matter
how the case turns out. You show an exceptional feeling for the plight
of your fellow man, Krause. Is that instinct or heritage?

--
Skipper

Harry Krause wrote:

Libby allegedly lied to a federal grand jury. That's perjury. He also
allegedly made false statements to federal officials investigating the
case, and he is accused of obstructing justice. Those are all federal
felonies.

Libby was charged with five (5) counts of lying. That's like a cop
issuing bumper-to-bumper tickets...abusive. The prosecutor was *only*
charged with prosecuting the outing. When he couldn't do that, he went
for entrapment. Damn Dems!!!

--
Skipper

In article , says...
jps wrote:

Snippy, leave justice to those charged with upholding the law.

The DOJ does not uphold the law, they abuse it. Fitzgerald is a good
example of DOJ "justice". He just ruined a man and his family and has no
shame.

Cough...cough....snort..."oh my god."

The DOJ gathered the FACTS. Based on the FACTS, the grand jury decided
to indict.

It's pretty clear that Libby tightened the noose around his own neck.

Your and my definition of "good man" differ quite a bit. I think your
definition includes lying, cheating and stealing. Mine doesn't.

jps