OT U.S. Soldiers may have burned bodies
 

On 20 Oct 2005 09:20:30 -0700, wrote:


wrote:
When you see the pics Guzzi-boy then believe it.

if rules are broken, then hold the breakers accountable.

No spin about it Caesarhead.

What kind of an idiot ARE you? Do you only believe what you've seen a
picture of?? I take it by picture of, you are referring to a
photograph? Do you believe in God? Seen any digital photographs of him?
By the way, your childish name calling doesn't do a whole lot for your
credibility.

Spoken by one who's never called names!

LOL!

--
John H

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant:
It's just that they know so much that isn't so."

Ronald Reagan

OT U.S. Soldiers may have burned bodies
 

PocoLoco wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:02:44 -0400, "The One and Only Smithers"
wrote:

Harry is cute isn't he, Kevin and Harry bring joy to all who reads their
words of wit. ; )

Is it just me, or have you noticed that both Kevin and Harry seems to harbor
some very deep seated anger.

I know you may have some doubts about my ability to diagnose psychological
problems, but I *did* minor in Psychology.

Therefore, I will say again, the problem is their potty training. The anger they
demonstrate here is totally misdirected, unless one of us was involved in their
potty training.

Damn you are dumber than a hammer.

OT U.S. Soldiers may have burned bodies
 

On 20 Oct 2005 09:25:17 -0700, wrote:


PocoLoco wrote:
On 20 Oct 2005 05:08:13 -0700, presented the group with
another cut'n'paste, which he may not have read.

Kevin, perhaps you should post it another half dozen times.

I'm not Kevin, you dolt.

Have you discussed your potty training with an adult in your life?

You've asked that tens of times before, just like the "Harry, you're a
****ing liar" post. Drinking heavily again? So, just to set the
newsgroup straight, what would make you think that I need to discuss my
"potty training" with anyone?

The 'anal fixation' you seem to share with another in the group is often a
result of poor potty training, especially when accompanied by overly severe
punishment. See:
http://psychology.about.com/od/gloss...Fixation13.htm
this will help you understand.


How can you
make comments about another's wife, yet go bananas when someone mentions either
of your parents?

Who's wife, dip****?

JimH's. Do you deny continuously referring to his wife (or ex-wife)?

Do you see any logic in this?


I'll ask again. Do you find it above board, a nice, friendly gesture,
and not low classed to bring someone's long dead parents into a
discussion, just because you don't know what you are talking about?

I certainly see nothing wrong with referring to a person's father or mother in a
non-derogatory manner, whether they are alive or dead.

By the way, when are you going to share with us the 'proof' that you're not
Kevin?

--
John H

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant:
It's just that they know so much that isn't so."

Ronald Reagan

OT U.S. Soldiers may have burned bodies
 

On 20 Oct 2005 09:27:41 -0700, wrote:


PocoLoco wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:54:33 -0400, "P Fritz"
wrote:


"PocoLoco" wrote in message
.. .
On 20 Oct 2005 05:08:13 -0700, presented the group with
another cut'n'paste, which he may not have read.

Kevin, perhaps you should post it another half dozen times.

Have you discussed your potty training with an adult in your life? How can
you
make comments about another's wife, yet go bananas when someone mentions
either
of your parents?

Do you see any logic in this?

Kevin is "Stuck on Stupid"

Well, I'm trying not to get into calling names, but he sure does make it rough.

Then quit calling me Kevin, you dumb ass.

I honestly believe he can work through some of his problems with the right help.
I would like to see some of his liberal friends giving him some help also, but I
can understand their reluctance to do so. He'd probably start calling them names
also!

Unlike you, most people have a life outside of this newsgroup, you low
life piece of ****!

Anal fixation kicking in again?

--
John H

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant:
It's just that they know so much that isn't so."

Ronald Reagan

OT U.S. Soldiers may have burned bodies
 

wrote in message

What kind of an idiot ARE you?

...and then.....


By the way, your childish name calling doesn't do a whole lot for your
credibility.


Did I miss something here?

OT U.S. Soldiers may have burned bodies
 

wrote in message

If the soldiers did something which violates the UCMJ, they'll be
punished,
unlike Nagin.

How did Nagin violate the UCMJ???? Damn, you're dumb.

1. Run, don't walk, down to the library.

2. Take out a book on basic grammatical sentence structure, and how to
properly read same.

2a. amendment to (2): Ask the librarian to find the book for you.
That will save a really really big humongous lotta time.

OT U.S. Soldiers may have burned bodies
 

PocoLoco wrote:

Spoken by one who's never called names!

Where did I EVER say I "never called names"?

LOL!

Idiots are easily amused.

OT U.S. Soldiers may have burned bodies
 

On 20 Oct 2005 10:28:37 -0700, wrote:


PocoLoco wrote:

Spoken by one who's never called names!

Where did I EVER say I "never called names"?

LOL!

Idiots are easily amused.

Where did you ever say you had any credibility?

--
John H

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant:
It's just that they know so much that isn't so."

Ronald Reagan

OT U.S. Soldiers may have burned bodies
 

Harry Krause wrote:

Herring and Hertvik want everyone to behave by standards they don't
observe.

Would seem you and your kind be the last ones to broach the subject of
"standards", or lack thereof.

--
Skipper

OT U.S. Soldiers may have burned bodies
 

Kevin,
I have to agree with you.

Are you still high stepping to Harry's orders?


wrote in message
oups.com...

PocoLoco wrote:

Spoken by one who's never called names!

Where did I EVER say I "never called names"?

LOL!

Idiots are easily amused.