Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "trainfan1" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: Just sort of lurking in this conversation, but if a stainless prop and an aluminum one were exactly the same dimensionally, why would one perform differently than the other? Friction differences due to surface characteristics? 1. Blade thickness. 2. Blade flex. The SS prop has the advantage in both categories and is therefore more efficient. The downside is that if you hit something you will end up doing some serious damage to your lower unit vs. an aluminum prop shedding part of its blades. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() -- Skipper |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
*JimH* wrote:
The SS prop has the advantage in both categories and is therefore more efficient. The downside is that if you hit something you will end up doing some serious damage to your lower unit vs. an aluminum prop shedding part of its blades. I've come to a different conclusion after 5 decades of scraping bottoms. The SS holds up better and does not add substantial additional risk. I say that having hit submerged concrete at WOT while river running (even having to repair holed lower units from impacts). If you do a LOT of boating, SS is the way to go. -- Skipper |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "trainfan1" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: Just sort of lurking in this conversation, but if a stainless prop and an aluminum one were exactly the same dimensionally, why would one perform differently than the other? Friction differences due to surface characteristics? Doug, no one would make a NiBrAl, brass, or SS prop with blades as thick as needed for the "same prop"(dia, pitch, area, shape) in aluminum, so you will never be able to make that comparison. A SS prop will be forgiving on logs & sandbars. Personal experience on our Glastron shows little difference in speed(SS slight advantage) but the SS is less prone to blow-outs and gives a better trim attide than the "same spec" aluminum. Polished SS props can be very pretty on your floating Camaro, too! Rob With that last line, you sold me on aluminum, simply for spiritual reasons. Too many floating Camaros around here, driven by "brunos", as my son (correctly) calls them. If I ever find out I have three months to live and prison doesn't matter, I plan on adding some new fishing structure to a few of the lakes around here. :-) |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought Skippy had a "21' Bilgeliner?
Fredo "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Skipper wrote: Doug Kanter wrote: Just sort of lurking in this conversation, but if a stainless prop and an aluminum one were exactly the same dimensionally, why would one perform differently than the other? Friction differences due to surface characteristics? Stainless steel is STIFFER than the aluminum prop and will outperform it. Also, aluminum props ding up much easier than steel props. Stainless is the way to go. -- Skipper Identically dimensioned aluminum and stainless props will perform about the same under identical circumstances for most boaters. If you are pushing a 21' fishboat with a 200 hp outboard, and you have two props, one alum and the other stainless, and they have the same pitch, diameter and blade geometry, the performance will be about the same. Different cup design, very high speed boat, et cetera, and thinner blades available on a stainless prop might make a difference. What would an ersatz Skipper know when the real Skipper never owned a boat? |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
R u sure?
I thought he had a 2152 or 2252 bilgeliner cuddy cabin? Wasn't that the boat he was talking about trailering all the way to the sea of Cortez? Also didn't he challenge someone here to a trailering contest at one time? "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... FREDO wrote: I thought Skippy had a "21' Bilgeliner? Fredo "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Skipper wrote: Doug Kanter wrote: Just sort of lurking in this conversation, but if a stainless prop and an aluminum one were exactly the same dimensionally, why would one perform differently than the other? Friction differences due to surface characteristics? Stainless steel is STIFFER than the aluminum prop and will outperform it. Also, aluminum props ding up much easier than steel props. Stainless is the way to go. -- Skipper Identically dimensioned aluminum and stainless props will perform about the same under identical circumstances for most boaters. If you are pushing a 21' fishboat with a 200 hp outboard, and you have two props, one alum and the other stainless, and they have the same pitch, diameter and blade geometry, the performance will be about the same. Different cup design, very high speed boat, et cetera, and thinner blades available on a stainless prop might make a difference. What would an ersatz Skipper know when the real Skipper never owned a boat? Naw. Skipper never owned a Bayliner. |