Harry,
You like to pretend this is not Skipper, if you really wanted to verify it,
you could do it very easily. Like most of your beliefs, you prefer not to
allow the truth to get in your way.

This is really Skipper, the same guy you were hoping would come back to
rec.boats.

Be careful what you wish for.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Skipper wrote:
The year...1955. \


You're very good at finding Skipper's old b.s. posts, copying them, and
reposting them.

But that doesn't make you...Skipper.

Starbucker wrote:
Harry,
You like to pretend this is not Skipper, if you really wanted to verify it,
you could do it very easily. Like most of your beliefs, you prefer not to
allow the truth to get in your way.

This is really Skipper, the same guy you were hoping would come back to
rec.boats.

Be careful what you wish for.


We want the 'real' Skipper back...but a bit more sensible and mellowed
out, not a cheap immitation.

Don White wrote:
Starbucker wrote:

Harry,
You like to pretend this is not Skipper, if you really wanted to
verify it, you could do it very easily. Like most of your beliefs,
you prefer not to allow the truth to get in your way.

This is really Skipper, the same guy you were hoping would come back
to rec.boats.

Be careful what you wish for.


We want the 'real' Skipper back...but a bit more sensible and mellowed
out, not a cheap immitation.

"We"?

Dan,
Don is a nice enough guy, but he has attached himself way to closely to
Krause.

Don,
One phone call can verify this is the real skipper. Harry prefers to
pretend it is not Skipper. I would have thought you were more realistic.


"Dan Krueger" wrote in message
nk.net...
Don White wrote:
Starbucker wrote:

Harry,
You like to pretend this is not Skipper, if you really wanted to verify
it, you could do it very easily. Like most of your beliefs, you prefer
not to allow the truth to get in your way.

This is really Skipper, the same guy you were hoping would come back to
rec.boats.

Be careful what you wish for.


We want the 'real' Skipper back...but a bit more sensible and mellowed
out, not a cheap immitation.

"We"?