Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 20:24:43 -0400, P. Fritz wrote:
A "public accomodation" is still private property, and the owners have the right to set standards.......otherwise you would not be able to have dress codes etc.........as usual the liebrals are barking up the wrong tree Try reading for content, I never said they couldn't set standards. I said they are limited in the rules they can set. If the airline wanted to ban the wearing of all tee-shirts, that would probably be legally acceptable, business suicide, but legally acceptable. But that's not what they did now, is it? They refused service to someone who was wearing a particular tee-shirt, a tee-shirt that clearly was making a political statement, a tee-shirt that is *probably* protected speech. Very subjective, and, IMO that is where the problem lies. And, yes, airlines are "private property", but they are also "public accommodations" and if you think the government has no say in how they are used, you are just plain wrong. |