JohnH wrote in message . ..
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 19:00:33 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 04:29:52 GMT, "Kathryn Simpson"
wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Uh...how about Afghanistan and Iraq, for starters, eh?

So you think the Iraqi people are better off with Hussein? Come
on, even the liberals aren't spouting that nonsense!

Texas is a pretty big place, bigger than the area devastated by
a dirty
bomb. Under Bush, Texas devolved into an environmental disaster
zone.

I asked you for an example of where in Texas Bush has created
more humanitarian and environmental damage than a dirty bomb
would create.

The entire state of Texas, where Bush softened or did not enforce
environmental standards, especially, but not limited to, Houston. A
dirty bomb tends to "dirty" a limited area. Bush sullied an entire
state, and a big one at that.

Do you have an answer for that or just more
rhetoric?

See the above.


You will find that many of the folks here do nothing more than blow rhetoric.
When logic and reason get them backed into a corner, they start a new thread
with...more rhetoric. Keep up the good words.

Indeed, that is the reich-wing M.O., along with excusing everything
horrific Bush does.

Harry, what did President George Bush do to Texas? Did he ruin the forests by
cutting down both trees? Did he befoul the Rio Grande by dumping more mud
therein? Houston was a mess long before

Technically more like Pasadena, Channelview, Baytown, Texas City,
etc... the pollution-causing industries are located in suburb towns
east of Houston rather than Houston itself...



either of the Bush's got into politics.
Now the mess is worse. Part of that is due to the tax dollars being spent on the
care and maintenance of illegal immigrants.

Have you hugged your drain plug lately?

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD