Gould 0738 wrote:

Doing nothing, in this case, is better than creating a bigger
boondoggle, and widening the disparity in health care.

How do you widen a disparity when the have-nots are already at "zero"?

Who said they have "zero"? You've already acknowleged, (And it was this
revelation which was partially responsible for this splinter thread),
that poor people can go to the "ER" for treatment, and that cost is
passed on to real paying people. That's what prompted you to propose
your "two tiered" approach to healthcare, which would therefore make it
glaringly obvious, and actually seem to be promoting, that we have
seperate classes of healthcare.


The statement makes no sense.

It does if you follow your own logic.

Dave