Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:31:16 -0400, "mono sect" wrote:
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... "There's an ethic here - that is of strict discipline, of not letting the fact you're working on a political campaign start to color your actions when it comes to national security," Hunter said. The incident took place last October, before Berger was an advisor to Kerry. Nice try, though. The fact that Kerry probably knew the incident took place last October, before Berger was an advisor to Kerry speaks volumes for John Kerry's "ethics". Sir: Unless you possess some extraordinary powers of discernment, you have no way of knowing what Mr. Kerry knew or did not know. It is therefore not a "fact," as you aver. [elided] It's not them, it is "we" who are know informed...as to Kerry's dump only AFTER the news has exposed Berger and therefore Kerry's use of him. Kerry Knew about this for 8 months but yet kept the thief whithin his inner circle. Once again: you have no way of knowing; and your continuing assertion does not alter the fact that your premise (that Mr. Kerry "knew") is invalid. Most sincerely, W.T. Hatch |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General |