OT--More NY Times bias
 

Dave Hall wrote:


Maybe because I studied the art of propaganda when I was in school,
that I'm more sensitive to these tricks. But to me it's blatantly
obvious.

It's hard to believe you studied much of anything, Dave. Where did you
matriculate...at Bob Jones U?



--
A vote for Nader is a vote for Bush;
A vote for Bush is a vote for Apocalypse.

OT--More NY Times bias
 

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:38:02 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
Hey Dave... if the news media is so liberally biased, why did so many
other newspapers put it in the headlines? Why did it makes such a big
splash in TV news?


Dave Hall wrote:
Because once the cat was let out of the bag, they had no choice but to
acknowledge it, lest their silence draw suspicion as to their agenda
and motives. If you listen real carefully to the subtle differences in
adjectives used to report this incident, you can almost see the wheels
of spin working depending on which news source you watch or read.

Oh, I get it... they're being incredibly devious by reporting the news,
including stuff that goes totally against their supposed agenda...

Dave, do you really believe this tripe yourself, or are you just hoping
that some of your fellow dittoheads are dumb & paranoid enough swallow it?

DSK


His minister told him. We shouldn't insult the guy until we've had a chance
to roll him around the newsgroup a bit. I wonder if Dave can get him to stop
by.

I don't have a "minister" or any other icon religious figure.

Dave

OT--More NY Times bias
 

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:04:04 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .


"This is still the united states, dipstick, and BUSH hasn't been
convicted of anything. Ergo, the assumption is he is innocent."

Sound familiar? Or do you always apply a double standard?

Dave




Based on THAT logic, the Iraqis we killed should be brought back to life,
since they died for nothing.

Which Iraqi's? The ones who were loyal to Saddam, or the ones involved
in the current insurgence?

Dave

OT--More NY Times bias
 

Dave Hall wrote:


Not at all. There are dozens of examples of Bush's lies, in which he
said one thing and then did another, or deliberately obfuscated his
actual position. The man lies about everything.

Such as?

Dave

Everything:

The entire or unabated amount or quantity of; the whole extent,
substance, or compass of; the whole.



--
A vote for Nader is a vote for Bush;
A vote for Bush is a vote for Apocalypse.

OT--More NY Times bias
 

Dave Hall wrote:



I don't have a "minister" or any other icon religious figure.

Dave


Dave still prays to that Coca-Cola bottle that fell from the sky into
his yard.


--
A vote for Nader is a vote for Bush;
A vote for Bush is a vote for Apocalypse.

OT--More NY Times bias
 

John P Reber wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:
Dave Hall wrote:



I don't have a "minister" or any other icon religious figure.

Dave



Dave still prays to that Coca-Cola bottle that fell from the sky into
his yard.


The Gods must be crazy.

Great movie.


Indeed; a classic. Betcha Dave hasn't seen it.


--
A vote for Nader is a vote for Bush;
A vote for Bush is a vote for Apocalypse.

OT--More NY Times bias
 

Harry Krause wrote:
Dave Hall wrote:



I don't have a "minister" or any other icon religious figure.

Dave



Dave still prays to that Coca-Cola bottle that fell from the sky into
his yard.


The Gods must be crazy.

Great movie.

OT--More NY Times bias
 

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:04:04 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .


"This is still the united states, dipstick, and BUSH hasn't been
convicted of anything. Ergo, the assumption is he is innocent."

Sound familiar? Or do you always apply a double standard?

Dave




Based on THAT logic, the Iraqis we killed should be brought back to life,
since they died for nothing.

Which Iraqi's? The ones who were loyal to Saddam, or the ones involved
in the current insurgence?

Dave


No. The innocent ones who got in the way.

OT--More NY Times bias
 

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:38:02 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
Hey Dave... if the news media is so liberally biased, why did so many
other newspapers put it in the headlines? Why did it makes such a big
splash in TV news?


Dave Hall wrote:
Because once the cat was let out of the bag, they had no choice but
to
acknowledge it, lest their silence draw suspicion as to their agenda
and motives. If you listen real carefully to the subtle differences
in
adjectives used to report this incident, you can almost see the
wheels
of spin working depending on which news source you watch or read.

Oh, I get it... they're being incredibly devious by reporting the news,
including stuff that goes totally against their supposed agenda...

Dave, do you really believe this tripe yourself, or are you just hoping
that some of your fellow dittoheads are dumb & paranoid enough swallow
it?

DSK


His minister told him. We shouldn't insult the guy until we've had a
chance
to roll him around the newsgroup a bit. I wonder if Dave can get him to
stop
by.

I don't have a "minister" or any other icon religious figure.

Dave

Well, ***someone*** puts you up to this. You couldn't possibly dream up some
of this nonsense yourself.

OT--More NY Times bias
 

Dave Hall wrote:
Maybe because I studied the art of propaganda when I was in school,
that I'm more sensitive to these tricks. But to me it's blatantly
obvious.

And so you follow the side that has the most obvious & blatant
propaganda? Is that like drinking the brand of diet soda that's most
heavily advertised?

BTW did you ever look up *any* of Bush's environmental policies? Care to
discuss them? How about his educational policies? His policies with
regard to the U.N. (now there's a set of flip-flops you can take to the
beach)?

And you insist that you're not being hoodwinked...



Dave, do you really believe this tripe yourself, or are you just hoping
that some of your fellow dittoheads are dumb & paranoid enough swallow it?


Or that maybe that you're to blind and partisan to consider it?

I prefer living in the real world, Dave. All sorts of fun things happen
out here. Of course, in the real world sometimes one has to admit one
might be wrong once in a while... but with you're in good company with
President Bush here. Neither of you acknowledge ever making any kind of
mistake. And of course neither of you ever ever lie!

DSK