NOYB wrote:


By the end of Bush's second term, there will be no governments left in the
Middle East which would dare fund, sponsor, harbor, or otherwise support
terrorist groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, al-Qaeda, etc. At
the very least, there will be no "new" nuclear powers there.

Iran is a hair away from becoming a serious nuclear power, and it has
its nuclear sites dispered all over its countryside. It will have
nuclear weapons shortly. There is no way Bush will be allowed to invade
Iran. If Bush unilaterally invades another country and that country has
not attacked us, he should be arrested. If Bush decides to invade Iran,
thousands upon thousands of our troops will be killed.

I must say, you do fit in well with the chickenhawks.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:


By the end of Bush's second term, there will be no governments left in
the
Middle East which would dare fund, sponsor, harbor, or otherwise support
terrorist groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, al-Qaeda, etc.
At
the very least, there will be no "new" nuclear powers there.

Iran is a hair away from becoming a serious nuclear power, and it has
its nuclear sites dispered all over its countryside. It will have
nuclear weapons shortly.

Which is exactly why we need to (and will) invade Iran. Either that, or the
Israeli's will do it for us.


There is no way Bush will be allowed to invade
Iran.

If the 9/11 Commission report contains enough damning evidence that Iran has
been working with al-Qaeda (both now and prior to 9/11), coupled with the
fact that they almost have nukes, then a vote by Congress to authorize a war
with Iran is virtually assured.

If Bush unilaterally invades another country

It wasn't unilateral. We had a coalition of the countries that matter...Us,
Great Britain, Spain, Italy, Australia, and several dozen "new Eurpean"
countries. Spain no longer "matters".

and that country has
not attacked us,

9/11 was an attack on America...and was carried out by a state-sponsored
terrorist organization. In light of the evidence that Iran has been working
with al -Qaeda, any attack by al-Qaeda is an attack by Iran...and casus
belli for war with Iran.


he should be arrested.

By whom?

If Bush decides to invade Iran,
thousands upon thousands of our troops will be killed.

Thousands upon thousands were killed on 9/11. Millions upon millions will
be killed if we must confront Iran *after* they've become a nuclear power.


I must say, you do fit in well with the chickenhawks.

And you fit in well with the French.

If Israeli does it, Harry will sing their praises.


"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:


By the end of Bush's second term, there will be no governments left in
the
Middle East which would dare fund, sponsor, harbor, or otherwise
support
terrorist groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, al-Qaeda, etc.
At
the very least, there will be no "new" nuclear powers there.

Iran is a hair away from becoming a serious nuclear power, and it has
its nuclear sites dispered all over its countryside. It will have
nuclear weapons shortly.

Which is exactly why we need to (and will) invade Iran. Either that, or
the
Israeli's will do it for us.


There is no way Bush will be allowed to invade
Iran.

If the 9/11 Commission report contains enough damning evidence that Iran
has
been working with al-Qaeda (both now and prior to 9/11), coupled with the
fact that they almost have nukes, then a vote by Congress to authorize a
war
with Iran is virtually assured.

If Bush unilaterally invades another country

It wasn't unilateral. We had a coalition of the countries that
matter...Us,
Great Britain, Spain, Italy, Australia, and several dozen "new Eurpean"
countries. Spain no longer "matters".

and that country has
not attacked us,

9/11 was an attack on America...and was carried out by a state-sponsored
terrorist organization. In light of the evidence that Iran has been
working
with al -Qaeda, any attack by al-Qaeda is an attack by Iran...and casus
belli for war with Iran.


he should be arrested.

By whom?

If Bush decides to invade Iran,
thousands upon thousands of our troops will be killed.

Thousands upon thousands were killed on 9/11. Millions upon millions will
be killed if we must confront Iran *after* they've become a nuclear power.


I must say, you do fit in well with the chickenhawks.

And you fit in well with the French.

Of course.


"John Smith" wrote in message
news:3aBKc.108793$JR4.85255@attbi_s54...
If Israeli does it, Harry will sing their praises.


"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:


By the end of Bush's second term, there will be no governments left
in
the
Middle East which would dare fund, sponsor, harbor, or otherwise
support
terrorist groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, al-Qaeda,
etc.
At
the very least, there will be no "new" nuclear powers there.

Iran is a hair away from becoming a serious nuclear power, and it has
its nuclear sites dispered all over its countryside. It will have
nuclear weapons shortly.

Which is exactly why we need to (and will) invade Iran. Either that, or
the
Israeli's will do it for us.


There is no way Bush will be allowed to invade
Iran.

If the 9/11 Commission report contains enough damning evidence that Iran
has
been working with al-Qaeda (both now and prior to 9/11), coupled with
the
fact that they almost have nukes, then a vote by Congress to authorize a
war
with Iran is virtually assured.

If Bush unilaterally invades another country

It wasn't unilateral. We had a coalition of the countries that
matter...Us,
Great Britain, Spain, Italy, Australia, and several dozen "new Eurpean"
countries. Spain no longer "matters".

and that country has
not attacked us,

9/11 was an attack on America...and was carried out by a state-sponsored
terrorist organization. In light of the evidence that Iran has been
working
with al -Qaeda, any attack by al-Qaeda is an attack by Iran...and casus
belli for war with Iran.


he should be arrested.

By whom?

If Bush decides to invade Iran,
thousands upon thousands of our troops will be killed.

Thousands upon thousands were killed on 9/11. Millions upon millions
will
be killed if we must confront Iran *after* they've become a nuclear
power.


I must say, you do fit in well with the chickenhawks.

And you fit in well with the French.

NOYB wrote:


There is no way Bush will be allowed to invade
Iran.

If the 9/11 Commission report contains enough damning evidence that Iran has
been working with al-Qaeda (both now and prior to 9/11), coupled with the
fact that they almost have nukes, then a vote by Congress to authorize a war
with Iran is virtually assured.

Sorry, Bub, but the neocon wet dream turned into a nightmare, and absent
an invasion sponsored by the actual government of Iraq, we'll be doing
nothing else in that immediate area.



If Bush unilaterally invades another country

It wasn't unilateral. We had a coalition of the countries that matter...Us,
Great Britain, Spain, Italy, Australia, and several dozen "new Eurpean"
countries. Spain no longer "matters".

Yeah, right. I figured you would fall for that one.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

...absent an invasion sponsored by the actual
government of Iraq, we'll be doing
nothing else in that immediate area.

What if the government of Iraq sponsored the invasion?

Allawi Vows Reprisals against Nations Supporting Iraq Terrorists

July 20, 2004

(CBN News) - Iraq's Defense Minister Ali Allawi says his country is ready to
strike back against nations it believes are supporting terrorists in Iraq.
He did not name any countries, in his interview with a London Arabic
newspaper.

But he did accuse Iraq's longtime enemy Iran of "blatant interference" in
his country. And he blames Syria for sending fighters into Iraq.

Reuters reports that the Iraqi Defense Minister also says Iraq has
confronted other countries with "facts and evidence."

He says those countries have done nothing to stop supporting terrorism in
Iraq.

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

...absent an invasion sponsored by the actual
government of Iraq, we'll be doing
nothing else in that immediate area.

What if the government of Iraq sponsored the invasion?

Allawi Vows Reprisals against Nations Supporting Iraq Terrorists

July 20, 2004

(CBN News) - Iraq's Defense Minister


CBN News? Now you are citing the krazed kristian broadcasting network?
Puke.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

...absent an invasion sponsored by the actual
government of Iraq, we'll be doing
nothing else in that immediate area.

What if the government of Iraq sponsored the invasion?

Allawi Vows Reprisals against Nations Supporting Iraq Terrorists

July 20, 2004

(CBN News) - Iraq's Defense Minister


CBN News? Now you are citing the krazed kristian broadcasting network?
Puke.

Right. Typical partisan response...attack the messenger, not the message.
Perhaps you'd prefer this report from Reuter's:

Iraq Says Will Hit at Countries Backing Rebels
Tue Jul 20, 2004 04:30 AM ET

DUBAI (Reuters) - Iraq is ready to retaliate against countries it accuses of
supporting violence wracking the country, the country's defense minister
warned Tuesday.
Hazim al-Shaalan mentioned no countries by name but accused old foe Iran of
"blatant interference." Iraq has also complained in the past about guerrilla
fighters entering the country from Syria.

"We are prepared to move the arena of the attacks on Iraq's honor and its
rights to those countries," he was quoted as saying by the London-based
Asharq al-Awsat newspaper.

"We've spoken to them and confronted them with facts and evidence, but none
of them have taken any action to stop supporting terrorism in Iraq," he
said.

Iraq blames a wave of bombings and assassinations, which has claimed
hundreds of lives including senior Iraqi politicians, on remnants of Saddam
Hussein's regime as well as foreign Islamic militants who have entered from
neighboring countries.

"They (Iranians) confess to the presence of their spies in Iraq who have a
mission to shake up the social and political situation," the defense
minister said.

"Iranian intrusion has been vast and unprecedented since the establishment
of the Iraqi state.

Washington, too, has accused Tehran of seeking to destabilize and gain
influence in Iraq, which like Iran, is predominantly Shi'ite Muslim. Tehran
denies interfering in Iraqi affairs.

Ousted Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein waged a protracted war against Iran
between 1980 and 1988 in which hundreds of thousands died on both sides.

Iraqi Prime Minister Iyad Allawi -- on a tour of Arab states bordering
Iraq -- won Jordanian support for his drive to crush insurgents.

Syria agreed earlier this month to help seal its long desert border with
Iraq and stop foreign insurgents infiltrating into Iraq to fight U.S. forces
and the U.S.-backed authorities.

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

...absent an invasion sponsored by the actual
government of Iraq, we'll be doing
nothing else in that immediate area.

What if the government of Iraq sponsored the invasion?

Allawi Vows Reprisals against Nations Supporting Iraq Terrorists

July 20, 2004

(CBN News) - Iraq's Defense Minister


CBN News? Now you are citing the krazed kristian broadcasting network?
Puke.

Right. Typical partisan response...attack the messenger, not the message.
Perhaps you'd prefer this report from Reuter's:

Frankly, if you even look at CBN, you are mentally defective.



Iraq Says Will Hit at Countries Backing Rebels
Tue Jul 20, 2004 04:30 AM ET

DUBAI (Reuters) - Iraq is ready to retaliate against countries it accuses of
supporting violence wracking the country, the country's defense minister
warned Tuesday.


Yes, he's beginning to sound more like Saddam every day.

If US troops invade Iran on the unilateral command of Bush, he will be
thrown out of office before the election by millions of Americans
marching on the White House.