By Arianna Huffington

That is the highly provocative question being asked in "Bush on the
Couch," a new book in which psychoanalyst and George Washington University
professor Dr. Justin Frank uses the president's public pronouncements and
behavior, along with biographical data, to craft a comprehensive
psychological profile of Bush 43.

It's not a pretty picture, but it goes a long way in explaining how
exactly our country got itself into the mess we are in: an intractable
war, the loss of allies and international goodwill, a half-trillion-dollar
deficit.

Poking around in the presidential psyche, Frank uncovers a man suffering
from megalomania, paranoia, a false sense of omnipotence, an inability to
manage his emotions, a lifelong need to defy authority, an unresolved
love-hate relationship with his father, and the repercussions of a history
of untreated alcohol abuse.

Other than that, George Bush is the picture of psychological health.

One of the more compelling sections of the book is Frank's dissection of
what he calls Bush's "almost pathological aversion to owning up to his
infractions" - a mindset common to individuals Freud termed "the
Exceptions," those who feel "entitled to live outside the limitations that
apply to ordinary people."

Limitations like, for instance, not driving while drunk. Or the limitation
of having to report for required Air National Guard duty. Or the
limitation of having to adhere to international law.

And it doesn't help one outgrow this sense of entitlement when Daddy and
his pals are always there to rescue you when you get in trouble - whether
it's keeping you out of Vietnam by bumping you to the top of the National
Guard waiting list or bailing you out of lousy business deals with cushy
seats on corporate boards or making sure the votes in Florida (just
another limitation) aren't properly counted.

But you don't make it as far as W. has without some psychological defenses
of your own - especially when it comes to insulating yourself against your
own fears and insecurities.

Raised in a family steeped in privilege and secrecy, and prone to the
intense aversion to introspection and denial of responsibility that are
the hallmarks of a so-called dry drunk - one who has kicked the bottle
without dealing with the root causes of the addiction - Bush has become a
master of the psychological jiu-jitsu known as Freudian Projection.

For those of you who bailed on Psych 101, Freudian Projection is,
according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, a
defense mechanism in which "the individual deals with emotional conflict
or internal or external stressors by falsely attributing to another his or
her own unacceptable feelings, impulses or thoughts."

In layman's terms, it's the soot-stained pot calling the kettle "black."

On the 2004 campaign trail, it's the pathologically inconsistent Bush
attempting to portray John Kerry as a two-faced flip-flopper.

It's become the Bush-Cheney campaign mantra. GOP talking points 1 through
100. The president's go-to laugh and applause line:

"Senator Kerry has been in Washington long enough to take both sides on
just about every issue," chided Bush at a spring fundraiser. "My opponent
clearly has strong beliefs, they just don't last very long." Ba-da-bum!
(Incidentally, how is this consistent with Bush's other contention, that
Kerry is a rock-ribbed liberal?)

Or as Dick "Not Peaches and Cream" Cheney ominously put it at a Republican
fundraiser: "These are not times for leaders who shift with the political
winds, saying one thing one day and another the next."

I couldn't f---ing agree more, Mr. Cheney. But it's your man George W. who
can't seem to pick a position and stick to it. He's reversed course more
times than Capt. Kirk battling Khan in the midst of the Mutara Nebula.
Gone back on his word more times than Tony Blundetto. Flip-flopped more
frequently than a blind gymnast with an inner-ear infection.

The list of Bush major policy U-turns is as audacious as it is long. Among
the whiplash-inducing lowlights:

In September 2001, Bush said capturing bin Laden was "our number one
priority." By March 2002, he was claiming, "I don't know where he is. I
have no idea and I really don't care. It's not that important."

In October 2001, he was dead-set against the need for a Department of
Homeland Security. Seven months later, he thought it was a great idea.

In May 2002, he opposed the creation of the 9/11 Commission. Four months
later, he supported it.

During the 2000 campaign, he said that gay marriage was a states' rights
issue: "The states can do what they want to do." During the 2004 campaign,
he called for a constitutional ban on gay marriage.

Dizzy yet? No? OK:

Bush supported CO2 caps, then opposed them. He opposed trade tariffs, then
he didn't. Then he did again. He was against nation building, then he was
OK with it. We'd found WMD, then we hadn't. Saddam was linked to Osama,
then he wasn't. Then he was . sorta. Chalabi was in, then he was out. Way
out.

In fact, Bush's entire Iraq misadventure has been one big costly, deadly
flip-flop:

We didn't need more troops, then we did. We didn't need more money, then
we did. Preemption was a great idea - on to Syria, Iran and North Korea!
Then it wasn't - hello, diplomacy! Baathists were the bad guys, then
Baathists were our buds. We didn't need the U.N., then we did.

And all this from a man who, once upon a time, made "credibility" a key to
his appeal.

Now, God knows, I have no problem with changing your mind - so long as you
admit that you have and can explain why. But Bush steadfastly - almost
comically - refuses to admit that there's been a change, even when the
entire world can plainly see otherwise. He's got his story and he's
sticking to it. But that darn Kerry, he keeps shifting his positions!

At the end of his analysis, Dr. Frank offers the following prescription:
"Having seen the depth and range of President Bush's psychological flaws .
our sole treatment option - for his benefit and for ours - is to remove
President Bush from office."

You don't need to be a psychiatrist to heartily second that opinion.

Jim wrote:
By Arianna Huffington

That is the highly provocative question being asked in "Bush on the
Couch," a new book in which psychoanalyst and George Washington University
professor Dr. Justin Frank uses the president's public pronouncements and
behavior, along with biographical data, to craft a comprehensive
psychological profile of Bush 43.

It's not a pretty picture, but it goes a long way in explaining how
exactly our country got itself into the mess we are in: an intractable
war, the loss of allies and international goodwill, a half-trillion-dollar
deficit.

Poking around in the presidential psyche, Frank uncovers a man suffering
from megalomania, paranoia, a false sense of omnipotence, an inability to
manage his emotions, a lifelong need to defy authority, an unresolved
love-hate relationship with his father, and the repercussions of a history
of untreated alcohol abuse.

Other than that, George Bush is the picture of psychological health.

One of the more compelling sections of the book is Frank's dissection of
what he calls Bush's "almost pathological aversion to owning up to his
infractions" - a mindset common to individuals Freud termed "the
Exceptions," those who feel "entitled to live outside the limitations that
apply to ordinary people."

Limitations like, for instance, not driving while drunk. Or the limitation
of having to report for required Air National Guard duty. Or the
limitation of having to adhere to international law.

And it doesn't help one outgrow this sense of entitlement when Daddy and
his pals are always there to rescue you when you get in trouble - whether
it's keeping you out of Vietnam by bumping you to the top of the National
Guard waiting list or bailing you out of lousy business deals with cushy
seats on corporate boards or making sure the votes in Florida (just
another limitation) aren't properly counted.

But you don't make it as far as W. has without some psychological defenses
of your own - especially when it comes to insulating yourself against your
own fears and insecurities.

Raised in a family steeped in privilege and secrecy, and prone to the
intense aversion to introspection and denial of responsibility that are
the hallmarks of a so-called dry drunk - one who has kicked the bottle
without dealing with the root causes of the addiction - Bush has become a
master of the psychological jiu-jitsu known as Freudian Projection.

For those of you who bailed on Psych 101, Freudian Projection is,
according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, a
defense mechanism in which "the individual deals with emotional conflict
or internal or external stressors by falsely attributing to another his or
her own unacceptable feelings, impulses or thoughts."

In layman's terms, it's the soot-stained pot calling the kettle "black."

On the 2004 campaign trail, it's the pathologically inconsistent Bush
attempting to portray John Kerry as a two-faced flip-flopper.

It's become the Bush-Cheney campaign mantra. GOP talking points 1 through
100. The president's go-to laugh and applause line:

"Senator Kerry has been in Washington long enough to take both sides on
just about every issue," chided Bush at a spring fundraiser. "My opponent
clearly has strong beliefs, they just don't last very long." Ba-da-bum!
(Incidentally, how is this consistent with Bush's other contention, that
Kerry is a rock-ribbed liberal?)

Or as Dick "Not Peaches and Cream" Cheney ominously put it at a Republican
fundraiser: "These are not times for leaders who shift with the political
winds, saying one thing one day and another the next."

I couldn't f---ing agree more, Mr. Cheney. But it's your man George W. who
can't seem to pick a position and stick to it. He's reversed course more
times than Capt. Kirk battling Khan in the midst of the Mutara Nebula.
Gone back on his word more times than Tony Blundetto. Flip-flopped more
frequently than a blind gymnast with an inner-ear infection.

The list of Bush major policy U-turns is as audacious as it is long. Among
the whiplash-inducing lowlights:

In September 2001, Bush said capturing bin Laden was "our number one
priority." By March 2002, he was claiming, "I don't know where he is. I
have no idea and I really don't care. It's not that important."

In October 2001, he was dead-set against the need for a Department of
Homeland Security. Seven months later, he thought it was a great idea.

In May 2002, he opposed the creation of the 9/11 Commission. Four months
later, he supported it.

During the 2000 campaign, he said that gay marriage was a states' rights
issue: "The states can do what they want to do." During the 2004 campaign,
he called for a constitutional ban on gay marriage.

Dizzy yet? No? OK:

Bush supported CO2 caps, then opposed them. He opposed trade tariffs, then
he didn't. Then he did again. He was against nation building, then he was
OK with it. We'd found WMD, then we hadn't. Saddam was linked to Osama,
then he wasn't. Then he was . sorta. Chalabi was in, then he was out. Way
out.

In fact, Bush's entire Iraq misadventure has been one big costly, deadly
flip-flop:

We didn't need more troops, then we did. We didn't need more money, then
we did. Preemption was a great idea - on to Syria, Iran and North Korea!
Then it wasn't - hello, diplomacy! Baathists were the bad guys, then
Baathists were our buds. We didn't need the U.N., then we did.

And all this from a man who, once upon a time, made "credibility" a key to
his appeal.

Now, God knows, I have no problem with changing your mind - so long as you
admit that you have and can explain why. But Bush steadfastly - almost
comically - refuses to admit that there's been a change, even when the
entire world can plainly see otherwise. He's got his story and he's
sticking to it. But that darn Kerry, he keeps shifting his positions!

At the end of his analysis, Dr. Frank offers the following prescription:
"Having seen the depth and range of President Bush's psychological flaws .
our sole treatment option - for his benefit and for ours - is to remove
President Bush from office."

You don't need to be a psychiatrist to heartily second that opinion.



Today, the lying, thieving thug known as Dubya claimed it didn't matter
that all the reasons and rationales he stated for invading Iraq were
incorrect. That in itself should be enough to dump him.

Harry Krause wrote in message
Today, the lying, thieving thug known as Dubya claimed it didn't matter
that all the reasons and rationales he stated for invading Iraq were
incorrect. That in itself should be enough to dump him.

Check this out, it's funny as hell!

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../fiorefear.DTL

I love the part when he says "we may have to interrupt the democratic
process, to prevent the terrorists from interrupting the democratic
process!"

basskisser wrote:
Harry Krause wrote in message
Today, the lying, thieving thug known as Dubya claimed it didn't matter
that all the reasons and rationales he stated for invading Iraq were
incorrect. That in itself should be enough to dump him.

Check this out, it's funny as hell!

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../fiorefear.DTL

I love the part when he says "we may have to interrupt the democratic
process, to prevent the terrorists from interrupting the democratic
process!"


Remain calm...code yellow.

Harry Krause wrote in message
Today, the lying, thieving thug known as Dubya claimed it didn't matter
that all the reasons and rationales he stated for invading Iraq were
incorrect. That in itself should be enough to dump him.

I'm beginning to think that ALL of the right wing politicians are
lying, thieving thugs. Next up, Tom DeLay, taking influence money.

basskisser wrote:

Harry Krause wrote in message
Today, the lying, thieving thug known as Dubya claimed it didn't matter
that all the reasons and rationales he stated for invading Iraq were
incorrect. That in itself should be enough to dump him.

I'm beginning to think that ALL of the right wing politicians are
lying, thieving thugs. Next up, Tom DeLay, taking influence money.


Ahh, DeLay is the slimeball's slime. There's not a lower life form in
all of Congress, an organization well-known for low-lifes.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

Harry Krause wrote in message
Today, the lying, thieving thug known as Dubya claimed it didn't matter
that all the reasons and rationales he stated for invading Iraq were
incorrect. That in itself should be enough to dump him.

I'm beginning to think that ALL of the right wing politicians are
lying, thieving thugs. Next up, Tom DeLay, taking influence money.


Ahh, DeLay is the slimeball's slime. There's not a lower life form in
all of Congress, an organization well-known for low-lifes.

How about the Ragin Cajun Cavell(sp?)

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

Harry Krause wrote in message
Today, the lying, thieving thug known as Dubya claimed it didn't matter
that all the reasons and rationales he stated for invading Iraq were
incorrect. That in itself should be enough to dump him.

I'm beginning to think that ALL of the right wing politicians are
lying, thieving thugs. Next up, Tom DeLay, taking influence money.


Ahh, DeLay is the slimeball's slime. There's not a lower life form in
all of Congress, an organization well-known for low-lifes.

How about the Ragin Cajun Cavell(sp?)

What crimes has Carvelle been accused of?

basskisser wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

Harry Krause wrote in message
Today, the lying, thieving thug known as Dubya claimed it didn't matter
that all the reasons and rationales he stated for invading Iraq were
incorrect. That in itself should be enough to dump him.

I'm beginning to think that ALL of the right wing politicians are
lying, thieving thugs. Next up, Tom DeLay, taking influence money.


Ahh, DeLay is the slimeball's slime. There's not a lower life form in
all of Congress, an organization well-known for low-lifes.

How about the Ragin Cajun Cavell(sp?)

What crimes has Carvelle been accused of?


Skewering Republicans, of course.

On 16 Jul 2004 04:16:06 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

Harry Krause wrote in message
Today, the lying, thieving thug known as Dubya claimed it didn't matter
that all the reasons and rationales he stated for invading Iraq were
incorrect. That in itself should be enough to dump him.

I'm beginning to think that ALL of the right wing politicians are
lying, thieving thugs. Next up, Tom DeLay, taking influence money.


Ahh, DeLay is the slimeball's slime. There's not a lower life form in
all of Congress, an organization well-known for low-lifes.

How about the Ragin Cajun Cavell(sp?)

What crimes has Carvelle been accused of?


Bad hair.

Dave