"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:


Nobody is saying that you can't do just that. But, when a man and a
woman
have sex and the woman gets pregnant then the decision has to be made
by
the
two of them.


Nope.

Why not, the child is a product of the two. There haven't been any
immaculate conceptions in about 2000 years.


You obviously do not know what the term "immaculate conception" means.
In reference to Mary, it means she was brought about without original
sin. The term you probably want is "virgin birth." No theology courses
in your background, Berti-Krap?

I see that you have been studying your enemy.


We're talking about the children here, dummy, not their parents.
OF course, as a conservative GOP'er, you really don't give a damn
about
the children or the problems they face. After all, they've been
born...and don't need championing, eh?

I am worried about the child that is sucked out and thrown away due
to
the
parents selfishness. The selfless act is raising the child once it is
concieved.


It's a fetus. Not a child.

Says who?


Lots of people, including the majority of those with serious education
in biological sciences. References to a fetus as a child is the result
of fundie-think, not science. No surprise. You're the guy who thinks
immaculate conception refers to non-sexual impregnation among humans.

There was a time when those with serious education in the physical sciences
thought that the earth was flat and that the earth is the center of the
universe. Well, they turned out to be wrong too.