Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "W.T. Hatch" wrote in message ... On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill" wrote: [elided] Serious question. Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown leadership ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her husband under any sort of marital control. Sir: I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life partnership? Curious notion. Most sincerely, W.T. Hatch There are great females available as candidates. A lot more qualified than Hillary. So why Hillary? California has 2 female senators. Feinstein is a lot sharper and more qualified. Now Boxer is a different story. IMO not qualified to be a city council person. Well, most of the successful marriages are a partnership. Some control in just respect and actions. Even Bill did not respect Hillary. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
) OT ) Bush's "needless war" | General | |||
OT The Incredible Lying BushCO! | General | |||
OT--Jobless Claims Fall, Inflation Stays Low | General | |||
Economy Rebounds - Productivity Soars, Jobless Claims Drop | General |