On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:39:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

[elided]

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her husband
under any sort of marital control.

Sir:

I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life
partnership?

Curious notion.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

There are great females available as
candidates. A lot more qualified than Hillary. So why Hillary?
California
has 2 female senators. Feinstein is a lot sharper and more qualified.
Now
Boxer is a different story. IMO not qualified to be a city council
person.


Well, most of the successful marriages are a partnership. Some control in
just respect and actions.

Sir:

I would never think to argue the "partnership" aspect of marriages. But do you
truly equate "respect" and "control?" Curiouser yet.

Even Bill did not respect Hillary.

You have no way of knowing the true nature of their relationship. No one does,
other than the principals.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch