I am still waiting for an apology from Chuck after his accusation.


"Starbuck" wrote in message
...
Chuck,

I agree the current Skipper is a sock puppet, but I have no idea who it
is. My bet is that it is not JimH, but I could be wrong. Heck it could be
Smithers. I also do not think everything "Skipper" relates is true, he
seems to have a chip on his shoulder and is going after you with both
barrels. He has related some stories I had never heard before, so this
must go back a number of years.

*JimH* wrote:
I am still waiting for an apology from Chuck after his accusation.


You will get one when and if I become convinced that I am wrong.
Can't put it any straighter than that.
Yes, there's a statistically miniscule possiblity that two posts, from
two "different" people would use the same exceptionally bizarro
formatting surrounding a quote and an identical opening line a few days
apart. The possibility gets even more remote when one considers that
going after the same third party was the intent of both posts.

You have apologized, when proven wrong, in the past. When proven wrong,
I will do the same.






"Starbuck" wrote in message
...
Chuck,

I agree the current Skipper is a sock puppet, but I have no idea who it
is. My bet is that it is not JimH, but I could be wrong. Heck it could be
Smithers. I also do not think everything "Skipper" relates is true, he
seems to have a chip on his shoulder and is going after you with both
barrels. He has related some stories I had never heard before, so this
must go back a number of years.

wrote:
snip

You have apologized, when proven wrong, in the past. When proven wrong,
I will do the same.


Yeah..but we had to pry it out of him with a 'block & tackle'.