"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"thunder" wrote in message

Interesting graph. If you take it back to 1977, you will note that the
only times we had net job loss, a Republican was in the White House.
Damn, who would have thought?

You see what you want to see. Harken back, if you will, to Bus101, and
run that graph back many additional years. What you see is the ever
present business cycle at work, inevitable and immutable.


Indeed they do see what they want to see. Unfortunately your effort to
explain a natural phenomenon such as a business cycle in non-partisan terms
is ultimately wasted on the armchair partisan political hacks that populate
this forum. They genuinely believe that all that happens - good or bad - is
directly the result of the policies of the party leaders that they either
love or hate. All good comes from my side of the aisle, all bad comes from
the other. Such is their sad polarized view of the world. What a
dreadfully tedious drumbeat to march to.

Here Here! You are very correct it is quit pathetic!

"RG" wrote in message news:NDiVe.8810$mH.8732@fed1read07...

"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"thunder" wrote in message

Interesting graph. If you take it back to 1977, you will note that the
only times we had net job loss, a Republican was in the White House.
Damn, who would have thought?

You see what you want to see. Harken back, if you will, to Bus101, and
run that graph back many additional years. What you see is the ever
present business cycle at work, inevitable and immutable.


Indeed they do see what they want to see. Unfortunately your effort to
explain a natural phenomenon such as a business cycle in non-partisan
terms is ultimately wasted on the armchair partisan political hacks that
populate this forum. They genuinely believe that all that happens - good
or bad - is directly the result of the policies of the party leaders that
they either love or hate. All good comes from my side of the aisle, all
bad comes from the other. Such is their sad polarized view of the world.
What a dreadfully tedious drumbeat to march to.

Read back, RG. You'll see that Harry turned an statistical/informational
thread into a political one. And then thunder piled on with his "take it
back to 1977, only when a Republican was in the WH" claim.

Read back, RG. You'll see that Harry turned an statistical/informational
thread into a political one. And then thunder piled on with his "take it
back to 1977, only when a Republican was in the WH" claim.


"armchair partisan political hacks that populate this forum"

If the shoe fits...

If it serves you to claim no political intent to this post, and if you
believe such a claim extends to exonerate you any history of such activity,
then I simply leave you to the enjoyment of your delusion. And please don't
allow your sense of self-importance to allow you to believe that I am
singling you out. I usually make a point of trying to protect the innocent,
it's just that they're so god damned hard to find around here.

"RG" wrote in message news:_EjVe.8816$mH.3300@fed1read07...

Read back, RG. You'll see that Harry turned an statistical/informational
thread into a political one. And then thunder piled on with his "take it
back to 1977, only when a Republican was in the WH" claim.


"armchair partisan political hacks that populate this forum"

If the shoe fits...

If it serves you to claim no political intent to this post, and if you
believe such a claim extends to exonerate you any history of such
activity, then I simply leave you to the enjoyment of your delusion.

I don't get it.

Bad news=news
Good news=political

I'm just pointing out that the sour mood sweeping over this country is
because the news media only reports on the bad news...and ignores the good
news.

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

I don't get it.



Finally, a neutral, balanced and factually accurate assessment of the
situation at hand. I didn't think you had it in you.