Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:47:05 +0000, NOYB wrote:
Big sugar got in the way. Besides, there are thousands of homes to the south of those levees now. It's impossible to undo the damage. Ah yes, the Fanjul Family, corporate welfare at it's worst. I've mentioned before, the incestuous relationship between pork and campaign contributions. This is a prime example. The Fanjuls contribute to *both* Republican and Democrats, but oh, the payback, $60 million in 1998. No worries about environmental damages, the sugar industry is subsidized to the tune of $472 per acre. Sweet deal. http://southernstudies.org/facingsou...over-cafta.asp http://www.free-eco.org/articleDisplay.php?id=459 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The NY Times gets it - fiinally. OT | General | |||
NY Times - A bow to Bush! OT | General | |||
Great article about boating in the LA Times | Boat Building | |||
Great boating article in the LA Times | General | |||
Great article in the LA Times | General |