"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:54:52 GMT, Don White
wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:
PocoLoco wrote:

I heard that was a common fault with the 'Desmo' also. Did you
experience that?



Got Desmo on your little brain, Herring?



He'd be happier doing more riding and less talking with his Moto Guzzler

My goodness, Harry and Donald chiming in on a post to b'asskisser! Does
the fact
that the guy lied not bother either of you? I wonder why?

After all, this is the guy who lambastes those who not only admit their
mistakes, but are man enough to apologize for them!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Indeed, and the key word in your last sentence is "man". ;-)

*JimH* wrote:

Indeed, and the key word in your last sentence is "man". ;-)

So, are you still insisting that Canada hasn't helped in relief
efforts?
What about your pact to quit childish name calling, and OT posting?

On 12 Sep 2005 12:36:47 -0700, wrote:


*JimH* wrote:

Indeed, and the key word in your last sentence is "man". ;-)

So, are you still insisting that Canada hasn't helped in relief
efforts?
What about your pact to quit childish name calling, and OT posting?

Jim called you no name. I suggested you should be a man and apologize for your
'mistake' that you turned into a large fabrication with your fake web pages.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...
On 12 Sep 2005 12:36:47 -0700, wrote:


*JimH* wrote:

Indeed, and the key word in your last sentence is "man". ;-)

So, are you still insisting that Canada hasn't helped in relief
efforts?
What about your pact to quit childish name calling, and OT posting?

Jim called you no name. I suggested you should be a man and apologize for
your
'mistake' that you turned into a large fabrication with your fake web
pages.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

I also never accused Canada of not giving anything to the relief effort. I
simply stated I had not read about any donations.

My exact words in the thread "Oh Canada" we

"Maybe I missed the news but so far I have not ready about any donations
from
your Country."

The attack dogs are out in full force for some strange reason.

*JimH* wrote:
"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...

On 12 Sep 2005 12:36:47 -0700, wrote:


*JimH* wrote:


Indeed, and the key word in your last sentence is "man". ;-)

So, are you still insisting that Canada hasn't helped in relief
efforts?
What about your pact to quit childish name calling, and OT posting?

Jim called you no name. I suggested you should be a man and apologize for
your
'mistake' that you turned into a large fabrication with your fake web
pages.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."


I also never accused Canada of not giving anything to the relief effort. I
simply stated I had not read about any donations.

My exact words in the thread "Oh Canada" we

"Maybe I missed the news but so far I have not ready about any donations
from
your Country."

The attack dogs are out in full force for some strange reason.


We knew exactly what you meant. You have a long history of trashing
Canada. This time you were caught doing so after praising our efforts a
few days before. If you can't remember what you're posting, I'd suggest
you layoff the 'church wine'.

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:35:45 GMT, Don White wrote:

*JimH* wrote:
"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...

On 12 Sep 2005 12:36:47 -0700, wrote:


*JimH* wrote:


Indeed, and the key word in your last sentence is "man". ;-)

So, are you still insisting that Canada hasn't helped in relief
efforts?
What about your pact to quit childish name calling, and OT posting?

Jim called you no name. I suggested you should be a man and apologize for
your
'mistake' that you turned into a large fabrication with your fake web
pages.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."


I also never accused Canada of not giving anything to the relief effort. I
simply stated I had not read about any donations.

My exact words in the thread "Oh Canada" we

"Maybe I missed the news but so far I have not ready about any donations
from
your Country."

The attack dogs are out in full force for some strange reason.


We knew exactly what you meant. You have a long history of trashing
Canada. This time you were caught doing so after praising our efforts a
few days before. If you can't remember what you're posting, I'd suggest
you layoff the 'church wine'.

Kool. Now you are able to determine 'what one meant' in any way you want to
support your argument.

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

PocoLoco wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:35:45 GMT, Don White wrote:


*JimH* wrote:

"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...


On 12 Sep 2005 12:36:47 -0700, wrote:



*JimH* wrote:



Indeed, and the key word in your last sentence is "man". ;-)

So, are you still insisting that Canada hasn't helped in relief
efforts?
What about your pact to quit childish name calling, and OT posting?

Jim called you no name. I suggested you should be a man and apologize for
your
'mistake' that you turned into a large fabrication with your fake web
pages.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."


I also never accused Canada of not giving anything to the relief effort. I
simply stated I had not read about any donations.

My exact words in the thread "Oh Canada" we

"Maybe I missed the news but so far I have not ready about any donations
from
your Country."

The attack dogs are out in full force for some strange reason.



We knew exactly what you meant. You have a long history of trashing
Canada. This time you were caught doing so after praising our efforts a
few days before. If you can't remember what you're posting, I'd suggest
you layoff the 'church wine'.


Kool. Now you are able to determine 'what one meant' in any way you want to
support your argument.

John..you stepped in and corrected him on this matter. You don't have
to hold his hand all the time. He'll never learn that way!

*JimH* wrote:
"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...
On 12 Sep 2005 12:36:47 -0700, wrote:


*JimH* wrote:

Indeed, and the key word in your last sentence is "man". ;-)

So, are you still insisting that Canada hasn't helped in relief
efforts?
What about your pact to quit childish name calling, and OT posting?

Jim called you no name. I suggested you should be a man and apologize for
your
'mistake' that you turned into a large fabrication with your fake web
pages.

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

I also never accused Canada of not giving anything to the relief effort. I
simply stated I had not read about any donations.

My exact words in the thread "Oh Canada" we

"Maybe I missed the news but so far I have not ready about any donations
from
your Country."

How ****ing stupid are you, Jim? You insinuated that Canada wasn't
helping, and you know it. YOU ****ed up, admit it. If not, then why did
you also say the following, when JohnH, your nose/ass buddy said:

"Canada's offers were made public about a day after the incident. Don't

remember
exactly, but they included a bunch of special mission C-130s. "

YOU then said:


"I obviously missed that....and if what you say is correct, I
apologize."

So, my question is, why are you apologizing for something you now claim
that you didn't do????

On 13 Sep 2005 05:41:09 -0700, wrote:


How ****ing stupid are you, Jim?

Tell us about your fabricated motorcycle, b'asskisser!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...
On 13 Sep 2005 05:41:09 -0700, wrote:


How ****ing stupid are you, Jim?

Tell us about your fabricated motorcycle, b'asskisser!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Or Masters of Structural Engineering degree from Ga. Tech.