![]() |
Noybby Visits California
"P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net... I can empathize with Mr. ex-Navy. There's no reasoning with people like Ms. Kneisler because they lack logic and reason. It's like trying to debate with a 2 year old. However, you don't get angry with the two year old, because he/she doesn't know any better. A grown woman like Ms. Kneisler should know better...and that's where the frustration sets in. She probably does, but it is all politics......11,000 deaths, as she cites, would equal between 88 and 158 days of deaths of innocents that Hussein averaged. (depnding on whois doing the count) In reality, the US, in the last year, has saved up to 35,000 in the last year much snipage Hmmm, I think your numbers may not tell the whole story. How much of the Saddam death toll is the folks we left twist in the wind after they thought we would support them in thier uprising? Further, how many Iraqi deaths were due to fallout from the brutal embargo? Mark Browne |
Noybby Visits California
Mark Browne wrote:
"P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message rthlink.net... I can empathize with Mr. ex-Navy. There's no reasoning with people like Ms. Kneisler because they lack logic and reason. It's like trying to debate with a 2 year old. However, you don't get angry with the two year old, because he/she doesn't know any better. A grown woman like Ms. Kneisler should know better...and that's where the frustration sets in. She probably does, but it is all politics......11,000 deaths, as she cites, would equal between 88 and 158 days of deaths of innocents that Hussein averaged. (depnding on whois doing the count) In reality, the US, in the last year, has saved up to 35,000 in the last year much snipage Hmmm, I think your numbers may not tell the whole story. How much of the Saddam death toll is the folks we left twist in the wind after they thought we would support them in thier uprising? Further, how many Iraqi deaths were due to fallout from the brutal embargo? Mark Browne Shhhh...don't bring up stuff like that...it confuses them. |
I Have Met the Enemy ...
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jeff Rigby wrote: Harry, a good article that should be explored further. When I meet or hear a black person who is rigidly racist I have to think about what they must have gone thru in their life to turn them thus. I then silently thank god for the black men who have risen above the resentment and hate. They have had a positive impact on us. When I hear a Liberal who is foaming at the mouth I have a hard time understanding what they have gone thru. Nor does their retoric provide any solutions to the real life problems they are protesting against. The marine that went balistic at the poor man and woman who were peacefully demonstrating I can understand because I have been thru some of the same history. Thousands were killed needlessly in Vietnam because of POLITICS in this country. It's starting again. A war that is nessasary for the long term safety of the world is being turned into a political football. There's no evidence the war Bush is waging will ensure the long term safety of anything. If you would clear your mind of your hatred of Pres. Bush you might be able to see clearly enough to understand that we are in a war for our national and western cultural survival. There is no evidence whatsoever that Bush's War will have any positive impact on our survival or that of "western" culture. Your posit is just the latest in the never-ending string of rationalizations for idiot Bush's warmongering in Iraq and Afghanistan. Furthermore, I find nothing of value in the Bush or neocon philosophy of how the United States or "the world" should be, in terms of what survives or what is of value. What I see in Bush and the neocons is a new, world-wide, fascist order which the United Stetes "rules" for a short time through military action, threats of military action, and various nefarious efforts to prop up pseudo-democracies that play ball with "the" vision. Such an empire is inherently evil and will not last long. |
Noybby Visits California
"Mark Browne" wrote in message news:P5evc.6277$sI.466@attbi_s52... "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net... I can empathize with Mr. ex-Navy. There's no reasoning with people like Ms. Kneisler because they lack logic and reason. It's like trying to debate with a 2 year old. However, you don't get angry with the two year old, because he/she doesn't know any better. A grown woman like Ms. Kneisler should know better...and that's where the frustration sets in. She probably does, but it is all politics......11,000 deaths, as she cites, would equal between 88 and 158 days of deaths of innocents that Hussein averaged. (depnding on whois doing the count) In reality, the US, in the last year, has saved up to 35,000 in the last year much snipage Hmmm, I think your numbers may not tell the whole story. Just like the liebral's sign didn't How much of the Saddam death toll is the folks we left twist in the wind after they thought we would support them in thier uprising? One reason the numbers vary from 88 to 158......depends on who is doing the counting and who is counted . Further, how many Iraqi deaths were due to fallout from the brutal embargo? None. Mark Browne |
Noybby Visits California
How much of the Saddam death toll is the folks we left twist in the wind
after they thought we would support them in thier uprising? Quite a bit. Further, how many Iraqi deaths were due to fallout from the brutal embargo? Oh, oh. Not so fast. Saddam managed to live in a state of unfettered opulence throughout the embargo. Remember when one of his sons loaded a 40' trailer with $US and lit out for Iran as the invasion closed in on Baghdad? Even if the average denomination was a $20, a trailer-full has got to be tens of millions. That money could have purchased a 20 pound bag of rice for every family in Iraq, every month, for one hell of a long time. But, it didn't. Saddam was a *******. Any ruler who will live in luxury out of the national purse (rather than personal wealth) while kids are commonly dying from starvation is a *******. No serious person will lament that he has been removed- the legitimately debatable point is whether the end justified the means. Whether the embargo was right, or not, is less important than the established fact Hussein did far less than he could or should have done to ease the suffering of his people. A significant portion of the embargo deaths *are* his fault. |
No..i think he's in Halifax
** He's on the West coast...whole different world! **
"Jack Goff" wrote in message . .. "Don White" wrote: Another gun tottin' American jailed. Hey Don, you guys ever take out your own trash? You know, like Robinson? Got your own problems in the great white north, eh? Jack |
Noybby Visits California
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... How much of the Saddam death toll is the folks we left twist in the wind after they thought we would support them in thier uprising? Quite a bit. Further, how many Iraqi deaths were due to fallout from the brutal embargo? Oh, oh. Not so fast. Saddam managed to live in a state of unfettered opulence throughout the embargo. Remember when one of his sons loaded a 40' trailer with $US and lit out for Iran as the invasion closed in on Baghdad? Even if the average denomination was a $20, a trailer-full has got to be tens of millions. That money could have purchased a 20 pound bag of rice for every family in Iraq, every month, for one hell of a long time. But, it didn't. Saddam was a *******. Any ruler who will live in luxury out of the national purse (rather than personal wealth) while kids are commonly dying from starvation is a *******. No serious person will lament that he has been removed- the legitimately debatable point is whether the end justified the means. Whether the embargo was right, or not, is less important than the established fact Hussein did far less than he could or should have done to ease the suffering of his people. A significant portion of the embargo deaths *are* his fault. This is one of the rare cases where somebody said something that changed my mind on a newsgroup. Thanks. Mark Browne |
Noybby Visits California
The amount was in excess of $900,000,000 Just shy of a billion.
"Mark Browne" wrote in message news:8zwvc.33817$pt3.5356@attbi_s03... "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... How much of the Saddam death toll is the folks we left twist in the wind after they thought we would support them in thier uprising? Quite a bit. Further, how many Iraqi deaths were due to fallout from the brutal embargo? Oh, oh. Not so fast. Saddam managed to live in a state of unfettered opulence throughout the embargo. Remember when one of his sons loaded a 40' trailer with $US and lit out for Iran as the invasion closed in on Baghdad? Even if the average denomination was a $20, a trailer-full has got to be tens of millions. That money could have purchased a 20 pound bag of rice for every family in Iraq, every month, for one hell of a long time. But, it didn't. Saddam was a *******. Any ruler who will live in luxury out of the national purse (rather than personal wealth) while kids are commonly dying from starvation is a *******. No serious person will lament that he has been removed- the legitimately debatable point is whether the end justified the means. Whether the embargo was right, or not, is less important than the established fact Hussein did far less than he could or should have done to ease the suffering of his people. A significant portion of the embargo deaths *are* his fault. This is one of the rare cases where somebody said something that changed my mind on a newsgroup. Thanks. Mark Browne |
No..i think he's in Halifax
"Jack Goff" wrote in message ...
"Don White" wrote: Another gun tottin' American jailed. Hey Don, you guys ever take out your own trash? You know, like Robinson? Got your own problems in the great white north, eh? Jack What a bigot. Against anything that isn't white, with a red neck, huh? |
Noybby Visits California
"Mark Browne" wrote in message news:P5evc.6277$sI.466@attbi_s52...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net... I can empathize with Mr. ex-Navy. There's no reasoning with people like Ms. Kneisler because they lack logic and reason. It's like trying to debate with a 2 year old. However, you don't get angry with the two year old, because he/she doesn't know any better. A grown woman like Ms. Kneisler should know better...and that's where the frustration sets in. She probably does, but it is all politics......11,000 deaths, as she cites, would equal between 88 and 158 days of deaths of innocents that Hussein averaged. (depnding on whois doing the count) In reality, the US, in the last year, has saved up to 35,000 in the last year much snipage Hmmm, I think your numbers may not tell the whole story. How much of the Saddam death toll is the folks we left twist in the wind after they thought we would support them in thier uprising? We should have supported them. However I would love for you to explain the logic used to transfer blame from Saddam to the U.S. for the thing he did. Further, how many Iraqi deaths were due to fallout from the brutal embargo? Who made the emabargo so brutal? Not the U.S. There was more than enough money going into Iraq to keep everyone sustained. That money was going through a UNITED NATIONS operated program. Saddam lived large off that money - and it appears that official from other countries also engaged in personally profiting from that program. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com