Terry Spragg wrote:
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Bert Robbins wrote:

"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in
ink.net:


If you engage in subversive activities against the US government and
terrorist activities against US citizens, you are no longer a US
citizen.


And the only way to determine if someone has engaged in such
activities is
to HOLD A TRIAL.

How someone could be against the Kelo v. New London decision but be
for
this decision is definitive proof that partisanship has replaced
thought
in the American dialogue.


If the US military comes upon you and you have a weapon in your hand
and you are opposing them then that is all of the evidence that is
needed to classify you as an enemy combatant.





If you are an "enemy combatant," then you should fall under the
protection of the Geneva Convention.



Not if you're an "unlawful" enemy combatant.



After you have had a hearing and due process to identify you as a
convict, of course.

Terry K

The geneva convention provides protection to Signatories of the
Convention who meet specific criteria. It provides no protection for
those who do not meet those criteria. Spies, for example, are not
protected.

del

--
Del Cecchi
"This post is my own and doesn’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions,
strategies or opinions.”