NOYB,
If Harry had attended a decent college, he might be able to provide an
acceptable debate. Unfortunately, the U of Kansas did not provide him with
the tools your scientific education provided you.

It is amusing to see him resort to calling you names anytime you win an
argument.


"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Starbuck's" wrote in message
...
Harry,
Your thought process seems to off, this is not an either or situation.
It is possible, (and probably recommended) that we don't use a
terrorist hell-bent on destroying America or an uniformed dentist to
protect our civil liberties.

If you want to refute NOYB premise that Padilla is a gangbanger at
best, it would have made a much better argument that to say we have to
either entrust a terrorist or an uninformed dentist.

Life is not black and white, but you do not seem to understand the
nuances of the real world. I don't always agree with NYOB, but he
consistently out debates you on every issue.


Not too shabby for an "uniformed" dentist, eh?



First, I have no idea why the Smithers piece of crap addresses me, since
I don't read his posts until someone else regurgitates them, and even if
that happens, he isn't going to get a response from me.

As to your claiming to be not too shabby, I posit once again that you
have no understanding of our Constitution or the rule of law.


Then at least make an effort to support your argument. Simply stating
that you're right and everybody else is wrong convinces nobody.