"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
"Thomas Ranger" wrote in
:


"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
John Sobieski ] wrote in
:

On 10 Sep 2005, "Sam" wrote:
NOYB wrote:
This ruling did nothing to infringe on the rights of US citizens
who don't take up arms against this country.

The requirements of the charge of "taking up arms" are vague and
subjective, subject to the whims of the political party in power,
who at present are Republicans, which party at present seems to have
in office an overabundance of paranoid, narrow minded, greedy liars
and a base of comparatively stupid people whipped into a fundamental
religious and patriotic froth. Real US citizens have plenty to fear
with people like you and them in power. Sam

Messing around and planning to make a dirty bomb is not on the
forefront of a Real US citizen's mind.

Neither was it in the forefront of Jose Padilla's mind. Why don't
you try actually PAYING ATTENTION to the case? The Feds abandoned
the "dirty bomb" allegation quite a while ago.

Why do you insist on defending an obvious scumbag?

What led you to conclude that citizen Padilla is "an obvious scumbag"?
The now-abandoned "dirty bomb" allegation? Or something else claimed by
the same liars who originated the "dirty bomb" allegation?

Who cares! Padilla is a POS gang-banger at best...and a terrorist hellbent
on destroying America at worst. Either way, he's trash that deserves no
protection.