| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
"DSK" wrote in message ... actually, it's pretty simple, go slower NOYB wrote: Slower than what? Planing hulls going slower than planing speed are much less efficient. Nope. This is a common motorboater's misconception. If you doubt it, look at the fuel test results commonly printed in magazines. Just checked June 2004 Powerboat Reports, page 13 Boat/engine: Triumph 210 Chaos center console with single Honda 4-stroke 150hp Mileage at 1500 rpm (6mph): approximately 6.2mpg Mileage at 2500 rpm(9mph): approximately 3.5 mpg Mileage at 3000 rpm(25mph): approximately 6.5mpg So in this example, the most efficient (best mpg) speed is when the boat is on plane at 25 mph. In two-strokes, the difference would be even more dramatic since two-strokes consume significantly more gas than 4-strokes when travelling at trolling speed. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Engine dies- Putters when trying to plane- engine under under heavy load | General | |||
| Diesel Fuel Decontamination Units Give Stored Fuel Longer Life. | General | |||
| Why Ficht failed no1 | General | |||
| fuel delivery problem on outboard? help | General | |||
| engine paint in fuel system | General | |||