basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Take any pictures of "children in the biblical sense" with you? Was
any of them your students?

Your understanding and subsequent conclusion of something John H wrote
is a fine example of why you are a stupid idiot and is why people keep
reminding you of the *fact* that you are an idiot. Not only is your
conclusion wrong, you flaunt your stupidity by endlessly repeating the
fiction. The repetition of this fiction also shows the moral bankruptcy
of your character.

The only people who take *anything* you say seriously are either idiots
themselves, or are those who, because they agree with your political
ideology, lack the courage to confront you and are therefore compelled
to humor your stupidity.

-- Charlie

Typical. That shows just what you THINK you know, is pure drivel.
Every day, a lot of people take what I say very seriously.

No they don't. They are just humoring you.

Yesterday,
I did the structural design for roof components for a 940,000 square
foot distribution center. It is a design build project, and the roof
framing and details package I sent out will be used for pricing. Do
you think that those people take me seriously?

No.

You're probably an apprentice/intern at best, and your designs are
reviewed, corrected, and revised by experienced professionals. They
surely have no clue that you make specious charges against others on
usenet of viewing child pornography.


Now, about John. He specifically stated that he HOPED to see pictures
of "children in the biblical sense". Did he not?

No. You're an idiot, and a stupid one at that. You have arrived at an
illogical conclusion which, in your mind which is fraught with random
synapses, is a logical conclusion.

-- Charlie