Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Another Gorgeous Bay Day!
Left Deale at 6:30, headed for #83 with OldFart and Gimp aboard. Added a couple
more rod holders to the rails, and OldFart was kind enough to bring along a couple rods and a bag full of lures. The six rod spread seemed to work, no big tangles (couple little ones though). Tried a new lure brought along by OldFart, can't tell you what it is, 'cause it's secret. Maybe the Old Fart will read this and be nice, but not me. Anyway, we caught a 30"er about 15 minutes after dropping the lines in, and then things slowed way down. However, around 11:30 the buggers started biting again, and within another hour we landed three more stripers from about 20" to 25". Left the water at 1:30, after a spectacular day. Good weather, good company, and good fishing - for what more could one ask!! John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Another Gorgeous Bay Day!
John H wrote in message . ..
Left Deale at 6:30, headed for #83 with OldFart and Gimp aboard. Added a couple more rod holders to the rails, and OldFart was kind enough to bring along a couple rods and a bag full of lures. The six rod spread seemed to work, no big tangles (couple little ones though). Tried a new lure brought along by OldFart, can't tell you what it is, 'cause it's secret. Maybe the Old Fart will read this and be nice, but not me. Anyway, we caught a 30"er about 15 minutes after dropping the lines in, and then things slowed way down. However, around 11:30 the buggers started biting again, and within another hour we landed three more stripers from about 20" to 25". Left the water at 1:30, after a spectacular day. Good weather, good company, and good fishing - for what more could one ask!! John H Take any pictures of "children in the biblical sense" with you? Was any of them your students? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Another Gorgeous Bay Day!
basskisser wrote: Take any pictures of "children in the biblical sense" with you? Was any of them your students? Your understanding and subsequent conclusion of something John H wrote is a fine example of why you are a stupid idiot and is why people keep reminding you of the *fact* that you are an idiot. Not only is your conclusion wrong, you flaunt your stupidity by endlessly repeating the fiction. The repetition of this fiction also shows the moral bankruptcy of your character. The only people who take *anything* you say seriously are either idiots themselves, or are those who, because they agree with your political ideology, lack the courage to confront you and are therefore compelled to humor your stupidity. -- Charlie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Another Gorgeous Bay Day!
Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote: Take any pictures of "children in the biblical sense" with you? Was any of them your students? Your understanding and subsequent conclusion of something John H wrote is a fine example of why you are a stupid idiot and is why people keep reminding you of the *fact* that you are an idiot. Not only is your conclusion wrong, you flaunt your stupidity by endlessly repeating the fiction. The repetition of this fiction also shows the moral bankruptcy of your character. The only people who take *anything* you say seriously are either idiots themselves, or are those who, because they agree with your political ideology, lack the courage to confront you and are therefore compelled to humor your stupidity. -- Charlie Typical. That shows just what you THINK you know, is pure drivel. Every day, a lot of people take what I say very seriously. Yesterday, I did the structural design for roof components for a 940,000 square foot distribution center. It is a design build project, and the roof framing and details package I sent out will be used for pricing. Do you think that those people take me seriously? Now, about John. He specifically stated that he HOPED to see pictures of "children in the biblical sense". Did he not? He knows what he did. That is why he tried to retaliate with stupid childish crap from the internet. If he didn't do anything, he surely wouldn't have stooped THAT low. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Another Gorgeous Bay Day!
basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Take any pictures of "children in the biblical sense" with you? Was any of them your students? Your understanding and subsequent conclusion of something John H wrote is a fine example of why you are a stupid idiot and is why people keep reminding you of the *fact* that you are an idiot. Not only is your conclusion wrong, you flaunt your stupidity by endlessly repeating the fiction. The repetition of this fiction also shows the moral bankruptcy of your character. The only people who take *anything* you say seriously are either idiots themselves, or are those who, because they agree with your political ideology, lack the courage to confront you and are therefore compelled to humor your stupidity. -- Charlie Typical. That shows just what you THINK you know, is pure drivel. Every day, a lot of people take what I say very seriously. No they don't. They are just humoring you. Yesterday, I did the structural design for roof components for a 940,000 square foot distribution center. It is a design build project, and the roof framing and details package I sent out will be used for pricing. Do you think that those people take me seriously? No. You're probably an apprentice/intern at best, and your designs are reviewed, corrected, and revised by experienced professionals. They surely have no clue that you make specious charges against others on usenet of viewing child pornography. Now, about John. He specifically stated that he HOPED to see pictures of "children in the biblical sense". Did he not? No. You're an idiot, and a stupid one at that. You have arrived at an illogical conclusion which, in your mind which is fraught with random synapses, is a logical conclusion. -- Charlie |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Another Gorgeous Bay Day!
"Charles" wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Take any pictures of "children in the biblical sense" with you? Was any of them your students? Your understanding and subsequent conclusion of something John H wrote is a fine example of why you are a stupid idiot and is why people keep reminding you of the *fact* that you are an idiot. Not only is your conclusion wrong, you flaunt your stupidity by endlessly repeating the fiction. The repetition of this fiction also shows the moral bankruptcy of your character. The only people who take *anything* you say seriously are either idiots themselves, or are those who, because they agree with your political ideology, lack the courage to confront you and are therefore compelled to humor your stupidity. -- Charlie Typical. That shows just what you THINK you know, is pure drivel. Every day, a lot of people take what I say very seriously. No they don't. They are just humoring you. Yesterday, I did the structural design for roof components for a 940,000 square foot distribution center. It is a design build project, and the roof framing and details package I sent out will be used for pricing. Do you think that those people take me seriously? No. You're probably an apprentice/intern at best, and your designs are reviewed, corrected, and revised by experienced professionals. They surely have no clue that you make specious charges against others on usenet of viewing child pornography. Cripes, his boosting about designing 'roof components' as if he is important is like someone 'designing' a hubcap for a car. The fabricators end up doing most of the engineering work anyway. A 940,000 s.f. warehouse.....big whoop..........basic repetitive work that is done by the peons is most firms. Design/build = industry whores......is it any wonder that someone like asslicker is in their employ? Now, about John. He specifically stated that he HOPED to see pictures of "children in the biblical sense". Did he not? No. You're an idiot, and a stupid one at that. You have arrived at an illogical conclusion which, in your mind which is fraught with random synapses, is a logical conclusion. -- Charlie |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Another Gorgeous Bay Day!
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Another Gorgeous Bay Day!
On Thu, 27 May 2004 18:23:04 +0000, John H wrote:
Left Deale at 6:30, headed for #83 with OldFart and Gimp aboard. Added a couple more rod holders to the rails, and OldFart was kind enough to bring along a couple rods and a bag full of lures. The six rod spread seemed to work, no big tangles (couple little ones though). Were you TROLLING with 6 lines out, or mooching? If trolling, I must admit you're a Better Man than I! Lloyd Sumpter "Far Cove" Catalina 36 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Another Gorgeous Bay Day!
Lloyd Sumpter wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2004 18:23:04 +0000, John H wrote: Left Deale at 6:30, headed for #83 with OldFart and Gimp aboard. Added a couple more rod holders to the rails, and OldFart was kind enough to bring along a couple rods and a bag full of lures. The six rod spread seemed to work, no big tangles (couple little ones though). Were you TROLLING with 6 lines out, or mooching? If trolling, I must admit you're a Better Man than I! Lloyd Sumpter "Far Cove" Catalina 36 He was trolling. Very popular in the bay. You pull lots of rigs until you pass through a school of striped bass and hope you snag one. If there is a more boring form of sport fishing in the Bay, I haven't found it. And I don't know if John does this, but most of the trollers pull umbrella rigs. That way, when you catch a fish, you can reel in the fish and about 20 pounds of metal. Best way to catch stripers is to drift fish near those who are trolling. There's little current in the Bay, and all the trollers and chummers stir up the fish, which sooner or later go for whatever juicy bait you have waiting for while whilst you drift. |