Sarah Czepiel wrote:

"Juan Valdez" wrote:
Sarah,
That is what Harry said he did. Not only is the story not
believable, but
it is illegal to use deadly force to protect property.

I'd be interested to know given the scenario just exactly how
Harry or
anyone else for that matter is supposed to know the thief/intruder
isn't intent on doing bodily harm? I'm simply saying I would
pin the
guy myself. Look at it from my perspective - I open my
garage door
and discover someone inside my garage. My choices are
limited. I can
either try and reverse the car and back out, allowing the
intruder to
leave or allowing him to possibly come at me. What do I do? If
possible I will try and run ie: back out and drive away, BUT
if in a
split second the intruder comes toward me I am *most likely *
going to
try and stop him, even if it means I have to pin him against a
wall or
against another car. Split second decisions are never easy.
If I
were to feel threatened, I would respond with deadly force.

I know this doesn't directly respond to Harry's case but you
can see
my perspective.

Regards, Sarah

You have to consider the source of the story. herr e. kkkrause is
a pathological liar who exhibits no integrity and lacks rational
awareness as evidenced by the following:


Here is some background on *kkkrause* which shows the shallowness
and insincerity of his words. One moment he is
opposed to Americans owning handguns; then he states that gun
laws should be more strict; yet again he wishes to circumvent a
handgun law in his own state of residence, a law that was enacted
to allegedly make guns safer. It seems that *kkkrause* wants
other citizens to comply with tougher gun laws, but, he doesn't
like them applying to himself.

You're nothin' but a hypocrite harry.... harry the hypocrite!



Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:59:54 -0500
From: Harry Krause
Newsgroups: alt.obituaries
Subject: Neal Knox, firearms rights activist
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.49.4.184

....get rid of everyone who has a handgun AND the handguns, and
produce useful clothing.

-----------------------------------

Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:23:57 -0500
From: Harry Krause
Newsgroups: alt.obituaries
Subject: More good news for the gun ******s
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.49.4.184

I'm opposed to CCW, and I think guns and their owners should be
registered and licensed, with a license obtainable only after a
background check and a safety course.

-------------------------------

From: Harry Krause
Newsgroups: rec.guns
Subject: ISO "legal" six shooter for Maryland...
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:59:17 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: University of Maryland College Park
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: sniper.cs.umd.edu

I'm interested in buying my first handgun (I have a closet full
of shotguns), and what I want is a Ruger New Model Single Six
Hunter, model KNR7H, in stainless.

I want a new in the box pistola.

Problem is, I live in Maryland, and we have a state law that
makes legal purchase of this revolver a no-no, unless you
purchase one that was manufactured several years ago. Revolvers
manufacturer in, I believe, the last two years have to have an
integral lock on them. Ruger has not seen fit to re-engineer this
model to accommodate Maryalnd.

But it is legal, I understand, to buy a brand-new revolver if it
was manufactured prior to the "no lock, no sale" ban. What I
would have to do is find a a dealer either in Maryland or out of
state and arrange a legal sale. The out of state transaction
would be handled through a local holder of an FFL, I suppose.

Question is, how would I find out who has the model revolver I want?

Is there any sort of dealer cooperative where inventory lists are
available for perusal?

Thanks




--

I'm smarter, bigger, stronger, and a lot meaner than you are.
You also won't be the first person that I didn't like who I
had to kill. Legally.

-- john wesley gilmer III