|
Boating Scenes in Wedding Crashers
The movie is so-so, but there were a couple of boating scenes that look
as if they were shot over in the St. Micheals, Maryland, area. Movie starts out a bit idiotic, but there are some really funny scenes later. Rachel McAdams, or something like that, plays the female lead. She looks great handling a jib. |
The movie may be so-so to you, but to most of us it is hilarious.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message nk.net... The movie is so-so, but there were a couple of boating scenes that look as if they were shot over in the St. Micheals, Maryland, area. Movie starts out a bit idiotic, but there are some really funny scenes later. Rachel McAdams, or something like that, plays the female lead. She looks great handling a jib. |
Bill McKee wrote:
The movie may be so-so to you, but to most of us it is hilarious. "Harry Krause" wrote in message nk.net... The movie is so-so, but there were a couple of boating scenes that look as if they were shot over in the St. Micheals, Maryland, area. Movie starts out a bit idiotic, but there are some really funny scenes later. Rachel McAdams, or something like that, plays the female lead. She looks great handling a jib. To each his own. I thought the opening was week and silly, and in fact, we almost got up and left after 15 minutes. There were some funny scenes, but it was uneven, at best. Hilarious? I don't think so. Blazing Saddles was hilarious. Animal House was hilarious. I did enjoy the female lead in the movie, though, and I thought her "parents" - Chris Walken and the delicious Jane Seymour - were very good. Owen Wilson does very little for me as a ocmic actor. Walken can get away with anything. |
Harry Krause wrote:
Bill McKee wrote: The movie may be so-so to you, but to most of us it is hilarious. "Harry Krause" wrote in message nk.net... The movie is so-so, but there were a couple of boating scenes that look as if they were shot over in the St. Micheals, Maryland, area. Movie starts out a bit idiotic, but there are some really funny scenes later. Rachel McAdams, or something like that, plays the female lead. She looks great handling a jib. To each his own. I thought the opening was week and silly, and in fact, we almost got up and left after 15 minutes. There were some funny scenes, but it was uneven, at best. Hilarious? I don't think so. Blazing Saddles was hilarious. Animal House was hilarious. I did enjoy the female lead in the movie, though, and I thought her "parents" - Chris Walken and the delicious Jane Seymour - were very good. Owen Wilson does very little for me as a ocmic actor. Walken can get away with anything. Er, weak, even. |
Bill McKee wrote: The movie may be so-so to you, but to most of us it is hilarious. Who is "us"? Are you speaking for everyone in the world? The U.S.? For what it's worth, in my opinion, it IS hilarious, but I'd never be so egotistical that I'd speak for everyone! |
wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: The movie may be so-so to you, but to most of us it is hilarious. Who is "us"? Are you speaking for everyone in the world? The U.S.? For what it's worth, in my opinion, it IS hilarious, but I'd never be so egotistical that I'd speak for everyone! You don't speak for us? Read your posts? The fishing club I belong to have members who recommended the movie and said it was hilarious. Would even go back with his wife. |
Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: The movie may be so-so to you, but to most of us it is hilarious. Who is "us"? Are you speaking for everyone in the world? The U.S.? For what it's worth, in my opinion, it IS hilarious, but I'd never be so egotistical that I'd speak for everyone! You don't speak for us? No, I don't Read your posts? Yes, I do. The fishing club I belong to have members who recommended the movie and said it was hilarious. Would even go back with his wife. Hmm, first sentence uses members, plural. Second sentence uses his, singular. So, one could surmise that one person told you about the movie, and then you revert back to your original sentence "most of us", which is back to plural. Good job trying to spin your way out, but you've once again shown your stupidity. |
Kevin,
You seem to have a chip on your shoulder and are just looking for something to nit pick. wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: The movie may be so-so to you, but to most of us it is hilarious. Who is "us"? Are you speaking for everyone in the world? The U.S.? For what it's worth, in my opinion, it IS hilarious, but I'd never be so egotistical that I'd speak for everyone! You don't speak for us? No, I don't Read your posts? Yes, I do. The fishing club I belong to have members who recommended the movie and said it was hilarious. Would even go back with his wife. Hmm, first sentence uses members, plural. Second sentence uses his, singular. So, one could surmise that one person told you about the movie, and then you revert back to your original sentence "most of us", which is back to plural. Good job trying to spin your way out, but you've once again shown your stupidity. |
wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: The movie may be so-so to you, but to most of us it is hilarious. Who is "us"? Are you speaking for everyone in the world? The U.S.? For what it's worth, in my opinion, it IS hilarious, but I'd never be so egotistical that I'd speak for everyone! You don't speak for us? No, I don't Read your posts? Yes, I do. The fishing club I belong to have members who recommended the movie and said it was hilarious. Would even go back with his wife. Hmm, first sentence uses members, plural. Second sentence uses his, singular. So, one could surmise that one person told you about the movie, and then you revert back to your original sentence "most of us", which is back to plural. Good job trying to spin your way out, but you've once again shown your stupidity. You are showing your nastiness again. Your life that bad? |
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 07:46:00 -0400, "Dr.Kevorkian" Kevorkian forSurgeon
General@please drink this.com wrote: Kevin, You seem to have a chip on your shoulder and are just looking for something to nit pick. wrote in message roups.com... Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: The movie may be so-so to you, but to most of us it is hilarious. Who is "us"? Are you speaking for everyone in the world? The U.S.? For what it's worth, in my opinion, it IS hilarious, but I'd never be so egotistical that I'd speak for everyone! You don't speak for us? No, I don't Read your posts? Yes, I do. The fishing club I belong to have members who recommended the movie and said it was hilarious. Would even go back with his wife. Hmm, first sentence uses members, plural. Second sentence uses his, singular. So, one could surmise that one person told you about the movie, and then you revert back to your original sentence "most of us", which is back to plural. Good job trying to spin your way out, but you've once again shown your stupidity. Kevin sucked up a big one on his Moto Guzzi boo-boo. He's probably seeking revenge anywhere he can. -- John H. On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD |
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 07:46:00 -0400, "Dr.Kevorkian" Kevorkian forSurgeon General@please drink this.com wrote: Kevin, You seem to have a chip on your shoulder and are just looking for something to nit pick. wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: The movie may be so-so to you, but to most of us it is hilarious. Who is "us"? Are you speaking for everyone in the world? The U.S.? For what it's worth, in my opinion, it IS hilarious, but I'd never be so egotistical that I'd speak for everyone! You don't speak for us? No, I don't Read your posts? Yes, I do. The fishing club I belong to have members who recommended the movie and said it was hilarious. Would even go back with his wife. Hmm, first sentence uses members, plural. Second sentence uses his, singular. So, one could surmise that one person told you about the movie, and then you revert back to your original sentence "most of us", which is back to plural. Good job trying to spin your way out, but you've once again shown your stupidity. Kevin sucked up a big one on his Moto Guzzi boo-boo. He's probably seeking revenge anywhere he can. If you even respond to Smithers, you are sucking up a big one. |
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:14:54 GMT, "Harry.Krause" wrote:
John H. wrote: On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 07:46:00 -0400, "Dr.Kevorkian" Kevorkian forSurgeon General@please drink this.com wrote: Kevin, You seem to have a chip on your shoulder and are just looking for something to nit pick. wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: The movie may be so-so to you, but to most of us it is hilarious. Who is "us"? Are you speaking for everyone in the world? The U.S.? For what it's worth, in my opinion, it IS hilarious, but I'd never be so egotistical that I'd speak for everyone! You don't speak for us? No, I don't Read your posts? Yes, I do. The fishing club I belong to have members who recommended the movie and said it was hilarious. Would even go back with his wife. Hmm, first sentence uses members, plural. Second sentence uses his, singular. So, one could surmise that one person told you about the movie, and then you revert back to your original sentence "most of us", which is back to plural. Good job trying to spin your way out, but you've once again shown your stupidity. Kevin sucked up a big one on his Moto Guzzi boo-boo. He's probably seeking revenge anywhere he can. If you even respond to Smithers, you are sucking up a big one. My gosh, what does that make the one who responded to a response to Smithers??? -- John H. On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD |
Harry,
Is that being nice? "Harry.Krause" wrote in message ink.net... John H. wrote: On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 07:46:00 -0400, "Dr.Kevorkian" Kevorkian forSurgeon General@please drink this.com wrote: Kevin, You seem to have a chip on your shoulder and are just looking for something to nit pick. wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: The movie may be so-so to you, but to most of us it is hilarious. Who is "us"? Are you speaking for everyone in the world? The U.S.? For what it's worth, in my opinion, it IS hilarious, but I'd never be so egotistical that I'd speak for everyone! You don't speak for us? No, I don't Read your posts? Yes, I do. The fishing club I belong to have members who recommended the movie and said it was hilarious. Would even go back with his wife. Hmm, first sentence uses members, plural. Second sentence uses his, singular. So, one could surmise that one person told you about the movie, and then you revert back to your original sentence "most of us", which is back to plural. Good job trying to spin your way out, but you've once again shown your stupidity. Kevin sucked up a big one on his Moto Guzzi boo-boo. He's probably seeking revenge anywhere he can. If you even respond to Smithers, you are sucking up a big one. |
John H. wrote: On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 07:46:00 -0400, "Dr.Kevorkian" Kevorkian forSurgeon General@please drink this.com wrote: Kevin, You seem to have a chip on your shoulder and are just looking for something to nit pick. wrote in message roups.com... Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: The movie may be so-so to you, but to most of us it is hilarious. Who is "us"? Are you speaking for everyone in the world? The U.S.? For what it's worth, in my opinion, it IS hilarious, but I'd never be so egotistical that I'd speak for everyone! You don't speak for us? No, I don't Read your posts? Yes, I do. The fishing club I belong to have members who recommended the movie and said it was hilarious. Would even go back with his wife. Hmm, first sentence uses members, plural. Second sentence uses his, singular. So, one could surmise that one person told you about the movie, and then you revert back to your original sentence "most of us", which is back to plural. Good job trying to spin your way out, but you've once again shown your stupidity. Kevin sucked up a big one on his Moto Guzzi boo-boo. He's probably seeking revenge anywhere he can. -- John H. On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD I'm not Kevin. |
|
|
John H. wrote: On 11 Aug 2005 09:58:16 -0700, wrote: John H. wrote: On 11 Aug 2005 05:04:48 -0700, wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 07:46:00 -0400, "Dr.Kevorkian" Kevorkian forSurgeon General@please drink this.com wrote: Kevin, You seem to have a chip on your shoulder and are just looking for something to nit pick. wrote in message roups.com... Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: The movie may be so-so to you, but to most of us it is hilarious. Who is "us"? Are you speaking for everyone in the world? The U.S.? For what it's worth, in my opinion, it IS hilarious, but I'd never be so egotistical that I'd speak for everyone! You don't speak for us? No, I don't Read your posts? Yes, I do. The fishing club I belong to have members who recommended the movie and said it was hilarious. Would even go back with his wife. Hmm, first sentence uses members, plural. Second sentence uses his, singular. So, one could surmise that one person told you about the movie, and then you revert back to your original sentence "most of us", which is back to plural. Good job trying to spin your way out, but you've once again shown your stupidity. Kevin sucked up a big one on his Moto Guzzi boo-boo. He's probably seeking revenge anywhere he can. -- John H. On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD I'm not Kevin. Oh. Basskisser sucked up a big one on his Moto Guzzi boo-boo. He's probably seeking revenge anywhere he can. At least you know to whom I was referring! -- Nope, proved my point to you, you're just not bright enough to comprehend it. You couldn't 'prove' your way out of a wet paper bag. Certainly not to you, as it's hard to prove anything, or educate an idiot! |
Kevin,
If you are not Kevin, why do you care? wrote in message oups.com... John H. wrote: On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 07:46:00 -0400, "Dr.Kevorkian" Kevorkian forSurgeon General@please drink this.com wrote: Kevin, You seem to have a chip on your shoulder and are just looking for something to nit pick. wrote in message roups.com... Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: The movie may be so-so to you, but to most of us it is hilarious. Who is "us"? Are you speaking for everyone in the world? The U.S.? For what it's worth, in my opinion, it IS hilarious, but I'd never be so egotistical that I'd speak for everyone! You don't speak for us? No, I don't Read your posts? Yes, I do. The fishing club I belong to have members who recommended the movie and said it was hilarious. Would even go back with his wife. Hmm, first sentence uses members, plural. Second sentence uses his, singular. So, one could surmise that one person told you about the movie, and then you revert back to your original sentence "most of us", which is back to plural. Good job trying to spin your way out, but you've once again shown your stupidity. Kevin sucked up a big one on his Moto Guzzi boo-boo. He's probably seeking revenge anywhere he can. -- John H. On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD I'm not Kevin. |
51 st wrote: Kevin, If you are not Kevin, why do you care? I'm not Kevin, but you stupid buffoons reply to ME. If you had any sense at all, you'd post to Kevin, if you wanted an answer from him, Smithers. |
Why did you allow Kevin Noble to respond to the email I sent to you? In the
email I addressed it to Basskisser, but damn if Kevin Noble didn't respond to it. wrote in message oups.com... 51 st wrote: Kevin, If you are not Kevin, why do you care? I'm not Kevin, but you stupid buffoons reply to ME. If you had any sense at all, you'd post to Kevin, if you wanted an answer from him, Smithers. |
"52 nd Name" Smithers Inc wrote in message ... Why did you allow Kevin Noble to respond to the email I sent to you? In the email I addressed it to Basskisser, but damn if Kevin Noble didn't respond to it. Take it easy on kevin now......after all, he's suffering from BDS and is delusional wrote in message oups.com... 51 st wrote: Kevin, If you are not Kevin, why do you care? I'm not Kevin, but you stupid buffoons reply to ME. If you had any sense at all, you'd post to Kevin, if you wanted an answer from him, Smithers. |
Fritz,
I am sorry to hear about Kevin's health problems. What is BDF? "P. Fritz" wrote in message ... "52 nd Name" Smithers Inc wrote in message ... Why did you allow Kevin Noble to respond to the email I sent to you? In the email I addressed it to Basskisser, but damn if Kevin Noble didn't respond to it. Take it easy on kevin now......after all, he's suffering from BDS and is delusional wrote in message oups.com... 51 st wrote: Kevin, If you are not Kevin, why do you care? I'm not Kevin, but you stupid buffoons reply to ME. If you had any sense at all, you'd post to Kevin, if you wanted an answer from him, Smithers. |
"52 nd Name" Smithers Inc wrote in message ... Fritz, I am sorry to hear about Kevin's health problems. What is BDF? BDS......Bush Derangement Syndrome...............I think he may have picked it up from harry........... "P. Fritz" wrote in message ... "52 nd Name" Smithers Inc wrote in message ... Why did you allow Kevin Noble to respond to the email I sent to you? In the email I addressed it to Basskisser, but damn if Kevin Noble didn't respond to it. Take it easy on kevin now......after all, he's suffering from BDS and is delusional wrote in message oups.com... 51 st wrote: Kevin, If you are not Kevin, why do you care? I'm not Kevin, but you stupid buffoons reply to ME. If you had any sense at all, you'd post to Kevin, if you wanted an answer from him, Smithers. |
Fritz,
It is so terrible to see so many people suffering from the same disorder. Is it aggravated by FAS or substance abuse? "P. Fritz" wrote in message ... "52 nd Name" Smithers Inc wrote in message ... Fritz, I am sorry to hear about Kevin's health problems. What is BDF? BDS......Bush Derangement Syndrome...............I think he may have picked it up from harry........... "P. Fritz" wrote in message ... "52 nd Name" Smithers Inc wrote in message ... Why did you allow Kevin Noble to respond to the email I sent to you? In the email I addressed it to Basskisser, but damn if Kevin Noble didn't respond to it. Take it easy on kevin now......after all, he's suffering from BDS and is delusional wrote in message oups.com... 51 st wrote: Kevin, If you are not Kevin, why do you care? I'm not Kevin, but you stupid buffoons reply to ME. If you had any sense at all, you'd post to Kevin, if you wanted an answer from him, Smithers. |
"52 nd Name" Smithers Inc wrote in message ... Fritz, It is so terrible to see so many people suffering from the same disorder. Is it aggravated by FAS or substance abuse? Most likely, as exhibited by kevin and harry here. "P. Fritz" wrote in message ... "52 nd Name" Smithers Inc wrote in message ... Fritz, I am sorry to hear about Kevin's health problems. What is BDF? BDS......Bush Derangement Syndrome...............I think he may have picked it up from harry........... "P. Fritz" wrote in message ... "52 nd Name" Smithers Inc wrote in message ... Why did you allow Kevin Noble to respond to the email I sent to you? In the email I addressed it to Basskisser, but damn if Kevin Noble didn't respond to it. Take it easy on kevin now......after all, he's suffering from BDS and is delusional wrote in message oups.com... 51 st wrote: Kevin, If you are not Kevin, why do you care? I'm not Kevin, but you stupid buffoons reply to ME. If you had any sense at all, you'd post to Kevin, if you wanted an answer from him, Smithers. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com