| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
John H. wrote: Apparently you didn't see all the Democrats hailing the energy bill in the House today. Seventy-five Democrats voted for it. -- Apparently you didn't see that it was slipped in AFTER THE CONFERENCE WAS CLOSED, meaning no one, democrat or republican was able to consider or reject it. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
John H. wrote: On 29 Jul 2005 06:37:17 -0700, wrote: John H. wrote: Apparently you didn't see all the Democrats hailing the energy bill in the House today. Seventy-five Democrats voted for it. -- Apparently you didn't see that it was slipped in AFTER THE CONFERENCE WAS CLOSED, meaning no one, democrat or republican was able to consider or reject it. Was it slipped in AFTER the vote on the House floor? No? Well then all those Democrats had a chance to vote "NO". The thing is, the bill was read and debated AT THE CONFERENCE. The vote is after they all allegedly know what's in the bill. But, alas, the republicans in office now, being the slight-of-hand dirty pigs that they are, on purpose, had this entire clause inserted afterwards. Do you really think that the whole clause, which they worked on for months, was just accidently left out, then someone thought, oh, hell, we forgot this part... OR, do you think it was that they knew the bill would have a much greater failure rate if they did everything above board? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ups.com... John H. wrote: On 29 Jul 2005 06:37:17 -0700, wrote: John H. wrote: Apparently you didn't see all the Democrats hailing the energy bill in the House today. Seventy-five Democrats voted for it. -- Apparently you didn't see that it was slipped in AFTER THE CONFERENCE WAS CLOSED, meaning no one, democrat or republican was able to consider or reject it. Was it slipped in AFTER the vote on the House floor? No? Well then all those Democrats had a chance to vote "NO". The thing is, the bill was read and debated AT THE CONFERENCE. The vote is after they all allegedly know what's in the bill. But, alas, the republicans in office now, being the slight-of-hand dirty pigs that they are, on purpose, had this entire clause inserted afterwards. Do you really think that the whole clause, which they worked on for months, was just accidently left out, then someone thought, oh, hell, we forgot this part... OR, do you think it was that they knew the bill would have a much greater failure rate if they did everything above board? Are republicans the only dirty pigs or are there dirty pig democrats also Kevin? Are all republicans dirty pigs in your mind Kevin? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... John H. wrote: On 29 Jul 2005 06:37:17 -0700, wrote: John H. wrote: Apparently you didn't see all the Democrats hailing the energy bill in the House today. Seventy-five Democrats voted for it. -- Apparently you didn't see that it was slipped in AFTER THE CONFERENCE WAS CLOSED, meaning no one, democrat or republican was able to consider or reject it. Was it slipped in AFTER the vote on the House floor? No? Well then all those Democrats had a chance to vote "NO". The thing is, the bill was read and debated AT THE CONFERENCE. The vote is after they all allegedly know what's in the bill. But, alas, the republicans in office now, being the slight-of-hand dirty pigs that they are, on purpose, had this entire clause inserted afterwards. Do you really think that the whole clause, which they worked on for months, was just accidently left out, then someone thought, oh, hell, we forgot this part... OR, do you think it was that they knew the bill would have a much greater failure rate if they did everything above board? Are republicans the only dirty pigs or are there dirty pig democrats also Kevin? Are all republicans dirty pigs in your mind Kevin? I'm not Kevin. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... John H. wrote: On 29 Jul 2005 06:37:17 -0700, wrote: John H. wrote: Apparently you didn't see all the Democrats hailing the energy bill in the House today. Seventy-five Democrats voted for it. -- Apparently you didn't see that it was slipped in AFTER THE CONFERENCE WAS CLOSED, meaning no one, democrat or republican was able to consider or reject it. Was it slipped in AFTER the vote on the House floor? No? Well then all those Democrats had a chance to vote "NO". The thing is, the bill was read and debated AT THE CONFERENCE. The vote is after they all allegedly know what's in the bill. But, alas, the republicans in office now, being the slight-of-hand dirty pigs that they are, on purpose, had this entire clause inserted afterwards. Do you really think that the whole clause, which they worked on for months, was just accidently left out, then someone thought, oh, hell, we forgot this part... OR, do you think it was that they knew the bill would have a much greater failure rate if they did everything above board? Are republicans the only dirty pigs or are there dirty pig democrats also Kevin? Are all republicans dirty pigs in your mind Kevin? I'm not Kevin. Whatever you say. So can you answer the questions now? No, because you asked Kevin. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 29 Jul 2005 09:55:36 -0700, wrote:
John H. wrote: On 29 Jul 2005 06:37:17 -0700, wrote: John H. wrote: Apparently you didn't see all the Democrats hailing the energy bill in the House today. Seventy-five Democrats voted for it. -- Apparently you didn't see that it was slipped in AFTER THE CONFERENCE WAS CLOSED, meaning no one, democrat or republican was able to consider or reject it. Was it slipped in AFTER the vote on the House floor? No? Well then all those Democrats had a chance to vote "NO". The thing is, the bill was read and debated AT THE CONFERENCE. The vote is after they all allegedly know what's in the bill. But, alas, the republicans in office now, being the slight-of-hand dirty pigs that they are, on purpose, had this entire clause inserted afterwards. Do you really think that the whole clause, which they worked on for months, was just accidently left out, then someone thought, oh, hell, we forgot this part... OR, do you think it was that they knew the bill would have a much greater failure rate if they did everything above board? The bill was also debated on the House floor (live on C-Span!). Are you saying the sneaky Republicans inserted this AFTER the debate and vote in the House? Or, are you saying that none of the Democrats (or their innumerable staffers) who voted FOR the bill read it? And, not one of the Democrats who voted against the bill read it and told their buddies? John Kerry, as much as I dislike the guy, made several mentions of things in the bill that had been changed in conference. He (or one of his staffers) must have read the bill. -- John H. On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| OT Republican Pigs at Trough | General | |||
| Delay the king of crooks | General | |||
| OT More from the Republican Pigs. | General | |||
| Republican myths | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
