| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... John H. wrote: From what I've heard, the energy bill is mostly pork and white-wash. I've driven through France, and I've seen the nuclear reactors every 25 (seemingly) miles. I've not heard of a lot of reactor incidents in France, yet we seem afraid of nuclear energy. I'm astounded that we are still talking the advantages of 'clean coal' technology. Harry Byrd must have had a big hand in the drafting of the bill. I've got to agree. Byrd along with others, are assuredly behind the clean coal technology. While it IS much better than old coal-fired plants, it is still a terrible burden on the environment, with deep coal mines being depleted, and having to go to strip mines to get the stuff near the surface. There was a show on PBS called Appalacians. It was a hell of a show. Anyway, I also agree that we must make nuclear energy viable in the US, at least until other technologies become significantly viable. Congratulations Kevin. That was a nice post. See, you don't have to include foul language and insults in all your posts to prove a point. Keep it up. Now, if you could just figure out one simple fact. I'm not Kevin. |
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... John H. wrote: On 29 Jul 2005 06:37:17 -0700, wrote: John H. wrote: Apparently you didn't see all the Democrats hailing the energy bill in the House today. Seventy-five Democrats voted for it. -- Apparently you didn't see that it was slipped in AFTER THE CONFERENCE WAS CLOSED, meaning no one, democrat or republican was able to consider or reject it. Was it slipped in AFTER the vote on the House floor? No? Well then all those Democrats had a chance to vote "NO". The thing is, the bill was read and debated AT THE CONFERENCE. The vote is after they all allegedly know what's in the bill. But, alas, the republicans in office now, being the slight-of-hand dirty pigs that they are, on purpose, had this entire clause inserted afterwards. Do you really think that the whole clause, which they worked on for months, was just accidently left out, then someone thought, oh, hell, we forgot this part... OR, do you think it was that they knew the bill would have a much greater failure rate if they did everything above board? Are republicans the only dirty pigs or are there dirty pig democrats also Kevin? Are all republicans dirty pigs in your mind Kevin? I'm not Kevin. Whatever you say. So can you answer the questions now? No, I figured as much. |
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
|
"*JimH*" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... John H. wrote: On 29 Jul 2005 06:37:17 -0700, wrote: John H. wrote: Apparently you didn't see all the Democrats hailing the energy bill in the House today. Seventy-five Democrats voted for it. -- Apparently you didn't see that it was slipped in AFTER THE CONFERENCE WAS CLOSED, meaning no one, democrat or republican was able to consider or reject it. Was it slipped in AFTER the vote on the House floor? No? Well then all those Democrats had a chance to vote "NO". The thing is, the bill was read and debated AT THE CONFERENCE. The vote is after they all allegedly know what's in the bill. But, alas, the republicans in office now, being the slight-of-hand dirty pigs that they are, on purpose, had this entire clause inserted afterwards. Do you really think that the whole clause, which they worked on for months, was just accidently left out, then someone thought, oh, hell, we forgot this part... OR, do you think it was that they knew the bill would have a much greater failure rate if they did everything above board? Are republicans the only dirty pigs or are there dirty pig democrats also Kevin? Are all republicans dirty pigs in your mind Kevin? I'm not Kevin. Whatever you say. So can you answer the questions now? No, I figured as much. I see the "Kevin the Clown" show is back on the air for another 8+ hours. |
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... John H. wrote: On 29 Jul 2005 06:37:17 -0700, wrote: John H. wrote: Apparently you didn't see all the Democrats hailing the energy bill in the House today. Seventy-five Democrats voted for it. -- Apparently you didn't see that it was slipped in AFTER THE CONFERENCE WAS CLOSED, meaning no one, democrat or republican was able to consider or reject it. Was it slipped in AFTER the vote on the House floor? No? Well then all those Democrats had a chance to vote "NO". The thing is, the bill was read and debated AT THE CONFERENCE. The vote is after they all allegedly know what's in the bill. But, alas, the republicans in office now, being the slight-of-hand dirty pigs that they are, on purpose, had this entire clause inserted afterwards. Do you really think that the whole clause, which they worked on for months, was just accidently left out, then someone thought, oh, hell, we forgot this part... OR, do you think it was that they knew the bill would have a much greater failure rate if they did everything above board? Are republicans the only dirty pigs or are there dirty pig democrats also Kevin? Are all republicans dirty pigs in your mind Kevin? I'm not Kevin. Whatever you say. So can you answer the questions now? No, I figured as much. As I told you, I'm not Kevin. If you'll address me correctly, I'll answer you. Quit being so childish. |
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
|
"HarryKrause" wrote in message ... wrote: Did you copy the photo I have of Smithers: http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y13...n/smithers.jpg LOL. No matter whose side you're on, that's funny. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| OT Republican Pigs at Trough | General | |||
| Delay the king of crooks | General | |||
| OT More from the Republican Pigs. | General | |||
| Republican myths | General | |||
Linear Mode
