Good article. Thanks.



On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:44:11 -0400, "P. Fritz" wrote:

"It's always shocking when the left unmasks itself - it's usually very brief
but when it happens not only can't you turn away, it's actually important
that you don't. While it would seem impossible, the left has found a new
low, this time courtesy of both the Washington Post and the Los Angeles
Times.
On the same day, both newspapers published bizarre attacks on the most basic
values of personal appearance and physical health of the president and those
he supports. It's the newest indication of how frustrated and frenzied the
left has grown in the face of an America which refuses to join them in their
drowning
pool."........................................... ...........................
......



................................................. ...........................
............................"Of course, on the Left, one gets lost in
groupthink. Personal health, exercise and being aware of one's own body in
itself is an indication that you're conscious of yourself. Yet it is
personal unconsciousness which is encouraged and fostered in leftist
activist and leadership circles.

Being Unhealthy and celebrating the Ungroomed is an art form on the Left.
And ultimately, as evidenced by Chait's opinion piece, those who do take
care of themselves, and dare to remind society of how things should be, are
demonized. Why? Because they serve as a counterpoint to what the Left is
not.

You see, it now cannot be ignored that one side of the political spectrum
even looks unwell. And how does the Left strive to make that irrelevant? By
marginalizing those who are unlike them - the physically healthy, those who
actually take care of themselves, are to be mocked and
shunned"......................................... ...........................
....................................



http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti...6/113857.shtml

This explains it all about Harry, Kevin, Don, etc etc.








--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

John H. wrote:
Good article. Thanks.


Not even CLOSE to the way the Republican lemmings treated the Clintons,
INCLUDING their daughter.

wrote in message
ups.com...


John H. wrote:
Good article. Thanks.


Not even CLOSE to the way the Republican lemmings treated the Clintons,
INCLUDING their daughter.


Exactly how was Chelsea Clinton treated poorly or inappropriately by the
*Republicans* Kevin?

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


John H. wrote:
Good article. Thanks.


Not even CLOSE to the way the Republican lemmings treated the Clintons,
INCLUDING their daughter.


Exactly how was Chelsea Clinton treated poorly or inappropriately by the
*Republicans* Kevin?

I'm not Kevin.

wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


John H. wrote:
Good article. Thanks.


Not even CLOSE to the way the Republican lemmings treated the Clintons,
INCLUDING their daughter.


Exactly how was Chelsea Clinton treated poorly or inappropriately by the
*Republicans* Kevin?

I'm not Kevin.


Sure you are. Now answer the question Kevin. If not I will assume that you
cannot and that you make things up and then post them here as *facts*,

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


John H. wrote:
Good article. Thanks.


Not even CLOSE to the way the Republican lemmings treated the Clintons,
INCLUDING their daughter.


Exactly how was Chelsea Clinton treated poorly or inappropriately by the
*Republicans* Kevin?

I'm not Kevin.


Sure you are. Now answer the question Kevin. If not I will assume that you
cannot and that you make things up and then post them here as *facts*,


Assuming that Rush Limbaugh and Senator John McCain fall into the
category used in the original claim (before you amended it to
"Republicans") here are two very well known examples:


On his television show, Rush Limbaugh announced to his audience that
the new White House occupants had a dog. He then held up a picture of
Chelsea Clinton.

Senator John McCain, at a Republican Senate fundraiser, said "Why is
Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno."

(Double whammy on the second one- a nasty crack about Chelsea's looks
as well as an implication about Hillary's sexual preferences.)

Perhaps being denounced as "ugly" at a Republican Senate fundraiser or
called a "dog" on television does not meet your standard of "poor or
inappropriate treatment," but if it did- those would be two of many
available examples.

(In the interest of full disclosu Rush Limbaugh has publicly
apologized for a series of inappropriate and hurtful remarks made
against Chelsea Clinton.
That may be classier behavior than exhibited by any of his apostles who
now claim he never made any.)

wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


John H. wrote:
Good article. Thanks.


Not even CLOSE to the way the Republican lemmings treated the
Clintons,
INCLUDING their daughter.


Exactly how was Chelsea Clinton treated poorly or inappropriately by
the
*Republicans* Kevin?

I'm not Kevin.


Sure you are. Now answer the question Kevin. If not I will assume that
you
cannot and that you make things up and then post them here as *facts*,


Assuming that Rush Limbaugh and Senator John McCain fall into the
category used in the original claim (before you amended it to
"Republicans") here are two very well known examples:

I ammended nothing Chuck. The original claim was "Not even CLOSE to the way
the Republican lemmings treated the Clintons, INCLUDING their daughter."

Note the key word *Republican* Chuck.

Nice try.




On his television show, Rush Limbaugh announced to his audience that
the new White House occupants had a dog. He then held up a picture of
Chelsea Clinton.


Not saying you are wrong but............Cite?

Senator John McCain, at a Republican Senate fundraiser, said "Why is
Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno."

Again, a cite would be appreciated.

If they indeed said those things, they were wrong....dead wrong. The
President's children are always off limits to snide remarks or jokes being
made about them. Chelsea turned out to be a great kid and has a great
future ahead of her.

On 27 Jul 2005 13:42:04 -0700, "
wrote:




Assuming that Rush Limbaugh and Senator John McCain fall into the
category used in the original claim (before you amended it to
"Republicans") here are two very well known examples:


Perhaps being denounced as "ugly" at a Republican Senate fundraiser or
called a "dog" on television does not meet your standard of "poor or
inappropriate treatment," but if it did- those would be two of many
available examples.

It's done all the time in the name of humor. That's what your two
examples are of, if they truely did even happen.

How about all the remarks at that infamous Democratic fundraiser a
couple of years ago. Were they all in humor as well? Or do you think
a few of them were mean-spirited? Hmmm...

Tune into Leno one night. Your head would be swimming for a week.

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


John H. wrote:
Good article. Thanks.


Not even CLOSE to the way the Republican lemmings treated the Clintons,
INCLUDING their daughter.


Exactly how was Chelsea Clinton treated poorly or inappropriately by the
*Republicans* Kevin?

I'm not Kevin.


Sure you are. Now answer the question Kevin. If not I will assume that you
cannot and that you make things up and then post them here as *facts*,

I'm not Kevin. If you ask ME, I'll certainly answer.

wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


John H. wrote:
Good article. Thanks.


Not even CLOSE to the way the Republican lemmings treated the
Clintons,
INCLUDING their daughter.


Exactly how was Chelsea Clinton treated poorly or inappropriately by
the
*Republicans* Kevin?

I'm not Kevin.


Sure you are. Now answer the question Kevin. If not I will assume that
you
cannot and that you make things up and then post them here as *facts*,

I'm not Kevin. If you ask ME, I'll certainly answer.


Why would you answer when if I direct the question to 'ME' Kevin?