Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NOYB wrote:
And there is no "insurgency" in Iraq. And the Easter Bunny lays colored eggs. NOYB wrote: It's pretty amazing that 2 1/2 years in a hostile country with porous borders surrounded by enemy countries has produced fewer casualties than 1 fateful day in September '01. ?? You equate mass murder with military casualties? Another question: if Iraq is "hostile" then how can anyboidy say we won the war? And if the surrounding countries are 'enemy' then why did we invade Iraq and not them? If you keep doing stupid things, you always get bad results. ... It wasn't insurgents who killed those 3,000 Americans on 9/11...and it's not insurgents who killed 1800 US troops and countless Iraqi civilians since March 2003. So, if you want to eliminate the terrorist problem, you redefine the word 'terrorist.' I remember a while back there was a raging debate over the meaning of the word 'is'.... DSK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Just for Jimcomma | General | |||
Republican myths | General | |||
OT--Great headlines everywhere | General |