On 15 Jul 2005 07:19:00 -0700, "
wrote:



Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 13 Jul 2005 22:51:56 -0700, "
wrote:


To view some comments on the Bayliner 242 Classic Cruiser:

My brother's marina has two of these on the same pier he's on. I like
the styling, although they seem a little slab sided to me. It's kind
of like putting the sixties style cabin on a box and making the front
end pointy if you get my drift.

My brother went out on one and he said they tend to bounce a lot -
they don't seem to have any real weight to them. Any thoughts on
that?

Live long and prosper,

Tom


This is one of the "walkthrough" items I do every month, and we don't
get underway in the boat or claim that we have. The dealer says the
boat will do over 30mph, and depending on sea state its easy to imagine
there could indeed be quite a bit of bouncing. Some of the
characteristics that make the boat trailerable, such as the light
displacement and short waterline, give it a short and shallow
"footprint". Peeling off some speed *should* reduce the bounce, but one
would need to take the boat out to determine whether bouncing is much
of a problem and how speed related it might be. Proper adjustment of
trim and tabs would also have an effect on the amount of bouncing
experienced.

The "slab sides" are part of the evolution of this model. When it was
introduced, there was less freeboard but there was an engine box in the
cockpit. Inceasing the freeboard made it possible to place the engine
under a hatch in the cockpit and free'd up a lot of additional space.
Just another one of the compromises that every boat on the market is
forced to deal with: more of this means less off- or too much of-
something else.

That's about what I figured.

Nice write up.

Later,

Tom

On 15 Jul 2005 12:16:40 -0700, wrote:



Real Name wrote:
JimH,
I have to come to Gould's defense here. He has gone out of his way to make
positive comments about you, and has come to your defense when those about
you are slinging mud. Gould is a wonderful person, only someone who has
failed at every venture he has been involved would find it necessary to make
snide remarks directed towards you, and then innocently say "Who Me"?


It's because JimH has become the champion of childish insults, he's
taken that and the name calling crown from Fritz. But Fritz is a close
second, he follows Jim around like a puppy.

Chuck is defending JimH because JimH insults you? What has Chuck got against
*you*?

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:18:47 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:

wrote:

Real Name wrote:
JimH,
I have to come to Gould's defense here. He has gone out of his way to make
positive comments about you, and has come to your defense when those about
you are slinging mud. Gould is a wonderful person, only someone who has
failed at every venture he has been involved would find it necessary to make
snide remarks directed towards you, and then innocently say "Who Me"?


It's because JimH has become the champion of childish insults, he's
taken that and the name calling crown from Fritz. But Fritz is a close
second, he follows Jim around like a puppy.


It's their team - they're all members of Assholes United.

Chuck says nice things about Jim, so you call him an asshole? What did Chuck do
to *you*?

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

HarryKrause wrote:


The Chuckster needs no apology from me or anyone else. He's a top-drawer
guy. You, on the other hand, are disruptive, worthless piece'o'crap.

I'm still waiting to see you back up those "charges" you made that I
"threatened" you and your poor wife.


I find it odd that JimH has the nerve to act up & criticize others here
after his outrageous behavior a couple of weeks ago. If he had a 'lick
of sense', he'd shut up and slink away with his tail between his legs.