On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:01:01 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:35:48 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:

NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
Luskin has said he has been told by
the prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, that Rove is not a target of the
investigation.
Rove "isn't a target of the investigation", and yet the Democrats and
liberal press are jumping all over him. Would you like to bet that the
critics have egg on their collective faces once this investigation unfolds
completely?





Bush promised to "take appropriate action" if any member of his
administration was found involved in the matter.


"Involved" doesn't mean criminal activity.

Why hasn't Rove been fired?

"...involved in the matter..." and "... leaking the name of an
undercover CIA officer..." are not the same Harry.

Rove did not leak a name.



We don't know that. You may believe the Bu****es, but I don't.

Further, Rove is involved. Bush said he would fire anyone involved.

But Rove is still at the White House.

More Bush lies?

You don't know that Bush didn't pay someone to fly an airplane into the World
Trade Center, either. Start broadcasting that as a new rumor. Lot's of folks
will jump all over it!

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD