"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

wrote in message
ups.com...
Luskin has said he has been told by
the prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, that Rove is not a target of the
investigation.

Rove "isn't a target of the investigation", and yet the Democrats and
liberal press are jumping all over him. Would you like to bet that the
critics have egg on their collective faces once this investigation unfolds
completely?

You're a funny guy, you know? Who do you think decides who's a target?

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

wrote in message
ups.com...
Luskin has said he has been told by
the prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, that Rove is not a target of the
investigation.

Rove "isn't a target of the investigation", and yet the Democrats and
liberal press are jumping all over him. Would you like to bet that the
critics have egg on their collective faces once this investigation
unfolds completely?

You're a funny guy, you know? Who do you think decides who's a target?

The prosecutor.

Now don't ask me who pulls *his* strings, because I'm fully aware that *all*
investigations in Washington are a case of the fox guarding the hen house.

It's really no different from Jamie Gorelick sitting on a committee
investigating 9/11 failures (and cover-ups a la Sandy Berger). She drafted
the damn memo that had us handling terrorism as a domestic criminal act
rather than an international act of war.

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

wrote in message
ups.com...
Luskin has said he has been told by
the prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, that Rove is not a target of the
investigation.

Rove "isn't a target of the investigation", and yet the Democrats and
liberal press are jumping all over him. Would you like to bet that the
critics have egg on their collective faces once this investigation
unfolds completely?

You're a funny guy, you know? Who do you think decides who's a target?

The prosecutor.

Now don't ask me who pulls *his* strings, because I'm fully aware that
*all* investigations in Washington are a case of the fox guarding the hen
house.

It's really no different from Jamie Gorelick sitting on a committee
investigating 9/11 failures (and cover-ups a la Sandy Berger). She
drafted the damn memo that had us handling terrorism as a domestic
criminal act rather than an international act of war.

Just wanted to make sure that in your own head, you weren't living in a
fairy tale (again). :-)

Rove "isn't a target of the investigation", and yet the Democrats and
liberal press are jumping all over him. Would you like to bet that the
critics have egg on their collective faces once this investigation
unfolds completely?


How many years has it taken so far? Wanna bet the next 3 1/2 years fly
by with not conclusion?

You're a funny guy, you know? Who do you think decides who's a target?


The prosecutor.

Now don't ask me who pulls *his* strings, because I'm fully aware that
*all* investigations in Washington are a case of the fox guarding the hen
house.


Maybe President Bush's declaration that he'd get to the bottom of this
was just as feeble as his declaration that he'd get Osama Bin Laden.


It's really no different from Jamie Gorelick sitting on a committee
investigating 9/11 failures (and cover-ups a la Sandy Berger). She
drafted the damn memo that had us handling terrorism as a domestic
criminal act rather than an international act of war.


Doug Kanter wrote:
Just wanted to make sure that in your own head, you weren't living in a
fairy tale (again). :-)


Oh, he's still living in a fairy tale... notice how it's the Dems fault
that Rove is possibly under suspicion in a case the Bush declared a
horrible crime that he'd pursue no matter who it was? Notice how NOBBY
retreated to insisting that Clinton was worse (blow job! evil!)?

Reality just doesn't exit for NOBBY.

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
...

Oh, he's still living in a fairy tale... notice how it's the Dems fault
that Rove is possibly under suspicion in a case the Bush declared a
horrible crime that he'd pursue no matter who it was? Notice how NOBBY
retreated to insisting that Clinton was worse (blow job! evil!)?

Reality just doesn't exit for NOBBY.

DSK


Doug, you know as well as I do that Monica could have choked to death during
her generous act of kindness. Therefore, Clinton's crime was just as serious
as the one committed by whomever "outed" the CIA agent, which might have
resulted in similar loss of one human life.

Reality just doesn't exit for NOBBY.



Doug Kanter wrote:
Doug, you know as well as I do that Monica could have choked to death during
her generous act of kindness. Therefore, Clinton's crime was just as serious
as the one committed by whomever "outed" the CIA agent, which might have
resulted in similar loss of one human life.


It was also a VERY serious crime for a person with NOBBY's professed
belief in regard to the utmost sanctity of potential human life.

DSK

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"DSK" wrote in message
...

Oh, he's still living in a fairy tale... notice how it's the Dems fault
that Rove is possibly under suspicion in a case the Bush declared a
horrible crime that he'd pursue no matter who it was? Notice how NOBBY
retreated to insisting that Clinton was worse (blow job! evil!)?

Reality just doesn't exit for NOBBY.

DSK


Doug, you know as well as I do that Monica could have choked to death
during her generous act of kindness.

More likely, she probably contracted an STD.

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Rove "isn't a target of the investigation", and yet the Democrats and
liberal press are jumping all over him. Would you like to bet that the
critics have egg on their collective faces once this investigation
unfolds completely?


How many years has it taken so far? Wanna bet the next 3 1/2 years fly by
with not conclusion?

You're a funny guy, you know? Who do you think decides who's a target?


The prosecutor.

Now don't ask me who pulls *his* strings, because I'm fully aware that
*all* investigations in Washington are a case of the fox guarding the hen
house.


Maybe President Bush's declaration that he'd get to the bottom of this was
just as feeble as his declaration that he'd get Osama Bin Laden.


It's really no different from Jamie Gorelick sitting on a committee
investigating 9/11 failures (and cover-ups a la Sandy Berger). She
drafted the damn memo that had us handling terrorism as a domestic
criminal act rather than an international act of war.


Doug Kanter wrote:
Just wanted to make sure that in your own head, you weren't living in a
fairy tale (again). :-)

Oh, he's still living in a fairy tale... notice how it's the Dems fault
that Rove is possibly under suspicion in a case the Bush declared a
horrible crime that he'd pursue no matter who it was? Notice how NOBBY
retreated to insisting that Clinton was worse (blow job! evil!)?

I never mentioned Clinton by name.

"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Rove "isn't a target of the investigation", and yet the Democrats and
liberal press are jumping all over him. Would you like to bet that
the critics have egg on their collective faces once this investigation
unfolds completely?


How many years has it taken so far? Wanna bet the next 3 1/2 years fly by
with not conclusion?

You're a funny guy, you know? Who do you think decides who's a target?


The prosecutor.

Now don't ask me who pulls *his* strings, because I'm fully aware that
*all* investigations in Washington are a case of the fox guarding the
hen house.


Maybe President Bush's declaration that he'd get to the bottom of this
was just as feeble as his declaration that he'd get Osama Bin Laden.


It's really no different from Jamie Gorelick sitting on a committee
investigating 9/11 failures (and cover-ups a la Sandy Berger). She
drafted the damn memo that had us handling terrorism as a domestic
criminal act rather than an international act of war.


Doug Kanter wrote:
Just wanted to make sure that in your own head, you weren't living in a
fairy tale (again). :-)

Oh, he's still living in a fairy tale... notice how it's the Dems fault
that Rove is possibly under suspicion in a case the Bush declared a
horrible crime that he'd pursue no matter who it was? Notice how NOBBY
retreated to insisting that Clinton was worse (blow job! evil!)?

I never mentioned Clinton by name.


Not today.

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:05:18 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Now don't ask me who pulls *his* strings, because I'm fully aware that
*all* investigations in Washington are a case of the fox guarding the hen
house.


Speaking of strings, I heard this quote. " Bush firing Rove would be like
Charlie McCarthy firing Edgar Bergen." Cheap shot, but I thought it
rather funny.