Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Curtis CCR wrote:
What was Plame doing, and where, during the five years prior to this leak? Does it matter? Exposing the identity of an undercover CIA agent is a Federal crime... and rightly so. Plame was exposed by somebody close to the White House (most likely Karl Rove himself) to try & make some cheap political points. And I bet the reporters are going to be the only ones punished. DSK |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 13:24:30 -0400, DSK wrote:
Curtis CCR wrote: What was Plame doing, and where, during the five years prior to this leak? Does it matter? Exposing the identity of an undercover CIA agent is a Federal crime... and rightly so. Plame was exposed by somebody close to the White House (most likely Karl Rove himself) to try & make some cheap political points. And I bet the reporters are going to be the only ones punished. DSK Accusing Karl Rove is another way some try to make cheap political points. -- John H. On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John H. wrote: On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 13:24:30 -0400, DSK wrote: Curtis CCR wrote: What was Plame doing, and where, during the five years prior to this leak? Does it matter? Exposing the identity of an undercover CIA agent is a Federal crime... and rightly so. Plame was exposed by somebody close to the White House (most likely Karl Rove himself) to try & make some cheap political points. And I bet the reporters are going to be the only ones punished. DSK Accusing Karl Rove is another way some try to make cheap political points. -- And when it's all over, and it indeed IS Karl Rove, what will you say then? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And when it's all over, and it indeed IS Karl Rove, what will you say
then? And when it''s all over, you still will not prove your are NOT Kevin noble....? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Tim wrote: And when it's all over, and it indeed IS Karl Rove, what will you say then? And when it''s all over, you still will not prove your are NOT Kevin noble....? Sure I will, but will you, Smithers et al, JohnH, Fritz, and JimH be man enough to apologize for calling me Kevin Noble? Will you all be man enough to admit that you were ignorantly wrong? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kevin,
Why are you sending email to people using Kevin Noble's signature? wrote in message ups.com... Tim wrote: And when it's all over, and it indeed IS Karl Rove, what will you say then? And when it''s all over, you still will not prove your are NOT Kevin noble....? Sure I will, but will you, Smithers et al, JohnH, Fritz, and JimH be man enough to apologize for calling me Kevin Noble? Will you all be man enough to admit that you were ignorantly wrong? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Real Name wrote: Kevin, Why are you sending email to people using Kevin Noble's signature? I'm not, asshole. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John H. wrote: On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 13:24:30 -0400, DSK wrote: Curtis CCR wrote: What was Plame doing, and where, during the five years prior to this leak? Does it matter? Exposing the identity of an undercover CIA agent is a Federal crime... and rightly so. Plame was exposed by somebody close to the White House (most likely Karl Rove himself) to try & make some cheap political points. And I bet the reporters are going to be the only ones punished. DSK Accusing Karl Rove is another way some try to make cheap political points. -- Did you sober up long enough to read THIS PART: In October 2003, Rove reportedly admitted to the grand jury "that he circulated and discussed damaging information regarding [Plame] with others in the White House, outside political consultants, and journalists," part of an "aggressive campaign to discredit Wilson through the leaking and disseminating of derogatory information regarding him and his wife. So, we have Karl Rove accusing HIMSELF. Is HE making "cheap political points"? If you want to talk about cheap political points, how about Rove's "aggressive campaign to discredit Wilson through the leaking and disseminating of derogatory information regarding him and his wife." That's about as low as a politician can go! |