Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Traffic separation schemes have the same legal force as ColRegs, but
they are usually for approaching busy ports, or transiting waters thick with commercial traffic (like say, the English Channel fr'instance). In a narrow inland channel, no such anny-mull." Ah, I see. I should have repeated the phrase "Traffic Seperation" just to make sure that it was clear I meant that, not ColRegs. There are ColRegs for everywhere. Is Inland Rule 9 the same as a Traffic Seperation Plan, such as you find in the approaches to major ports like New York, Norfolk, etc etc? No. Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: Yes it is. You are required, as much as is possible, to stay to the starboard side of the channel either upbound or downbound. Paragraph 9 (a) (i) first sentence. That is separation of traffic anyway you cut it. It may be "seperation of traffic" but it's not a Traffic Seperation Plan, nor does it designate lanes. Look at a chart of Boston Harbor approaches some time, you might find it interesting... there are very definite lanes marked on the chart, and there is a designated Traffic Seperation Plan which is called that by name (so as to distinguish it from other things) and which has the force of ColRegs. And yes, the harbor master and the USCG will give tickets for vessels who violate it. For that matter, you can cruise in the middle of an narrow channel, but you still have to stay to the right when you have oncoming traffic. That in no way forbids a boat from going to the left side of the channel, nor does it obligate *all* vessels to *always* pass port-to-port. There seems to be an idea among many boaters that the rules of the road forbid another boat from being in their way, from inducing them to turn or (God forbid!) to slow down. That ain't the case *at all*. In the case mentioned by the original poster, a tourist boat coming over to the left side of the channel to watch wildlife, is totally kosher *if* the maneuver presented no imminent danger of collision. Since the original poster did not mention such things as slamming into reverse, putting the helm hard over, and narrowly avoiding collisions, I assumed that none of these things took place and that he was upset because another boat was on what he thought was 'his side.' Hence my statement that the water doesn't have little yellow lines on it like a road. DEMOCRATS SUCK!!! At least one does, or did. Can't deny that. Most don't though. ... REPUBLICANS RULE!!! Also true, unfortunately. But are they doing it well? Facts on the ground suggest not ![]() There, that should get things back on track. If only it were that easy! DSK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another strip-plank question - a bit long | Boat Building | |||
Propeller efficiency question (electric) | Boat Building | |||
Other choice and counterpoise question | Electronics | |||
Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft | Boat Building | |||
Sunday's VHF antics.....and a question.. | Electronics |