your narrow minded and
unsupported posits.

not my posits, gene, but rather the posits (your term) of the physicists, oil
rig designers, US Navy and every other person able to pass a high school
science course.

Please show the quote where I said I used an all chain rode.

the statement was not that you actually use anything at all to anchor, but
rather that you stupidly argue that all chain rode will not jerk the anchor
and/or deck chocks loose when the wind and waves pick up.

Physics, indeed!

yup, that is where the physics and mathematics of catinaries is taught.

You should have sat through a few intro classes of
logic, instead.

never took any *intro* courses in logic at the college level, but take quite a
number of upper level logic courses. (had the *intro* well covered in high
school)

JAXAshby wrote:

Please show the quote where I said I used an all chain rode.


the statement was not that you actually use anything at all to anchor, but
rather that you stupidly argue that all chain rode will not jerk the anchor
and/or deck chocks loose when the wind and waves pick up.




Yawn, yet another classic Jax-Ass who gives a **** string of posts.

hoary, go back to dreaming about your glory days racing wooden dinghies back in
the 1930's and all the junior high school girls swooning over you.

Please show the quote where I said I used an all chain rode.


the statement was not that you actually use anything at all to anchor, but
rather that you stupidly argue that all chain rode will not jerk the anchor
and/or deck chocks loose when the wind and waves pick up.




Yawn, yet another classic Jax-Ass who gives a **** string of posts.