If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

If it is bad for Kraus,
Then, Hell Harry, go on down the street to the next gay bar. You know 'em
all.

Cheers,
William

"Larry" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:57:13 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

William Bruce wrote:
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.


If it is bad for Kraus,
Then, Hell Harry, go on down the street to the next gay bar. You know
'em
all.

Cheers,
William




If you use a nym server or some other method to hide your identity
here, or if you post with a large number of different IDs here (aka
"Smithering"), or if you visit here only to take cheap shots at other
posters you don't like, then you are not in the "rec.boats" newsgroup to
exchange thoughts with others who enjoy boating or fishing, and you'll
probably be ignored by me and many others. More than likely, you're
probably going to end up on the "filtered out" bozo list.

Ever think about fishing or boating yourself? All your posting is off
topic
political crap. Get a life. Quit bitching at others that follow the
example
you set.


Larry
------------------------
The worst thing that ever happened
to rec.boats was Harry Krause

Poor harry has deluded himself into thinking that people fear being put
into his mythical 'bozo bin' which is about as real as his 36' lobsta boat.

Your are the Harry Krause, aren't you, who is registered as a sexual
offender of prepubscent boys.

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...

Posted on Mon, Jun. 20, 2005

Bush may bypass Senate as Democrats again block U.N. nominee

BY JAMES KUHNHENN
Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - (KRT) - Senate Democrats on Monday once again blocked the
nomination of John Bolton to be America's ambassador to the United
Nations, setting the stage for President Bush to consider bypassing Senate
confirmation by appointing Bolton while Congress is on a weeklong July
Fourth recess.

Democrats complained that the White House has refused to turn over
information about Bolton's activities while he was an official at the
State Department, which they say is crucial to determining his fitness for
the U.N. post.

Only three Democrats sided with Republicans in an attempt to end debate
and bring up the nomination for a final vote. Sen. George Voinovich of
Ohio, a Republican who opposes Bolton's nomination, voted with the
Democrats. Under Senate rules, Republicans needed 60 of the senators' 100
votes to end debate, but they mustered only 54.

"They put partisanship ahead of the Constitution and the Senate's right to
receive information from the executive branch of government," Senate
Democratic leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Monday of the Bush
administration. "Unless the president comes forward with information which
we're certain we're constitutionally entitled to, Bolton will not get
enough votes" to end debate on his nomination and move to a decisive vote,
Reid said.

On Monday, White House officials told one key Democrat that they were
willing to provide some but not all of the material Democrats had
requested. Democrats refused the offer and cast their challenge to Bolton
as a defense of the Senate's institutional rights rather than the merits
of his nomination.

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansas...s/politics/119



Quack attack: quack, quack, quack, quack.


Clinton did a recess appointment of the Ambassador to Saudi Arabia...so
what's your point?

P. Fritz wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:57:13 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

William Bruce wrote:
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.


If it is bad for Kraus,
Then, Hell Harry, go on down the street to the next gay bar. You know
'em
all.

Cheers,
William




If you use a nym server or some other method to hide your identity
here, or if you post with a large number of different IDs here (aka
"Smithering"), or if you visit here only to take cheap shots at other
posters you don't like, then you are not in the "rec.boats" newsgroup to
exchange thoughts with others who enjoy boating or fishing, and you'll
probably be ignored by me and many others. More than likely, you're
probably going to end up on the "filtered out" bozo list.

Ever think about fishing or boating yourself? All your posting is off
topic
political crap. Get a life. Quit bitching at others that follow the
example
you set.


Larry
------------------------
The worst thing that ever happened
to rec.boats was Harry Krause

Poor harry has deluded himself into thinking that people fear being put
into his mythical 'bozo bin' which is about as real as his 36' lobsta boat.

Poor Fritz, has never posted about boats.

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...

Posted on Mon, Jun. 20, 2005

Bush may bypass Senate as Democrats again block U.N. nominee

BY JAMES KUHNHENN
Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - (KRT) - Senate Democrats on Monday once again blocked the
nomination of John Bolton to be America's ambassador to the United
Nations, setting the stage for President Bush to consider bypassing
Senate confirmation by appointing Bolton while Congress is on a weeklong
July Fourth recess.

Democrats complained that the White House has refused to turn over
information about Bolton's activities while he was an official at the
State Department, which they say is crucial to determining his fitness
for the U.N. post.

Only three Democrats sided with Republicans in an attempt to end debate
and bring up the nomination for a final vote. Sen. George Voinovich of
Ohio, a Republican who opposes Bolton's nomination, voted with the
Democrats. Under Senate rules, Republicans needed 60 of the senators' 100
votes to end debate, but they mustered only 54.

"They put partisanship ahead of the Constitution and the Senate's right
to receive information from the executive branch of government," Senate
Democratic leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Monday of the Bush
administration. "Unless the president comes forward with information
which we're certain we're constitutionally entitled to, Bolton will not
get enough votes" to end debate on his nomination and move to a decisive
vote, Reid said.

On Monday, White House officials told one key Democrat that they were
willing to provide some but not all of the material Democrats had
requested. Democrats refused the offer and cast their challenge to Bolton
as a defense of the Senate's institutional rights rather than the merits
of his nomination.

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansas...s/politics/119



Quack attack: quack, quack, quack, quack.



Clinton did a recess appointment of the Ambassador to Saudi Arabia...so
what's your point?




How many major appointments did Clinton make of candidates refused a vote
in the US Senate?

He made 56 recess appointments in the first 6 1/2 years of his Presidency.
I couldn't find statistics for the last year and half.

So how many did Bush make?

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...

NOYB wrote:

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...


Posted on Mon, Jun. 20, 2005

Bush may bypass Senate as Democrats again block U.N. nominee

BY JAMES KUHNHENN
Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - (KRT) - Senate Democrats on Monday once again blocked the
nomination of John Bolton to be America's ambassador to the United
Nations, setting the stage for President Bush to consider bypassing
Senate confirmation by appointing Bolton while Congress is on a
weeklong July Fourth recess.

Democrats complained that the White House has refused to turn over
information about Bolton's activities while he was an official at the
State Department, which they say is crucial to determining his fitness
for the U.N. post.

Only three Democrats sided with Republicans in an attempt to end debate
and bring up the nomination for a final vote. Sen. George Voinovich of
Ohio, a Republican who opposes Bolton's nomination, voted with the
Democrats. Under Senate rules, Republicans needed 60 of the senators'
100 votes to end debate, but they mustered only 54.

"They put partisanship ahead of the Constitution and the Senate's right
to receive information from the executive branch of government," Senate
Democratic leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Monday of the Bush
administration. "Unless the president comes forward with information
which we're certain we're constitutionally entitled to, Bolton will not
get enough votes" to end debate on his nomination and move to a
decisive vote, Reid said.

On Monday, White House officials told one key Democrat that they were
willing to provide some but not all of the material Democrats had
requested. Democrats refused the offer and cast their challenge to
Bolton as a defense of the Senate's institutional rights rather than
the merits of his nomination.

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansas...s/politics/119



Quack attack: quack, quack, quack, quack.



Clinton did a recess appointment of the Ambassador to Saudi Arabia...so
what's your point?




How many major appointments did Clinton make of candidates refused a vote
in the US Senate?


He made 56 recess appointments in the first 6 1/2 years of his
Presidency. I couldn't find statistics for the last year and half.

So how many did Bush make?




How many recess appointments to major positions did Clinton make of
candidates refused a vote in the US Senate?

And if you find any, the second question:

How many recess appointments to major positions did Clinton make of
candidates TWICE refused a vote in the US senate?

Do your own research if you want to find the exact number. However, James
Hormel and Roger Gregory are two of the more high-profile individuals who
come to mind.

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:27:51 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

NOYB wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...

NOYB wrote:

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...


Posted on Mon, Jun. 20, 2005

Bush may bypass Senate as Democrats again block U.N. nominee

BY JAMES KUHNHENN
Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - (KRT) - Senate Democrats on Monday once again blocked the
nomination of John Bolton to be America's ambassador to the United
Nations, setting the stage for President Bush to consider bypassing
Senate confirmation by appointing Bolton while Congress is on a weeklong
July Fourth recess.

Democrats complained that the White House has refused to turn over
information about Bolton's activities while he was an official at the
State Department, which they say is crucial to determining his fitness
for the U.N. post.

Only three Democrats sided with Republicans in an attempt to end debate
and bring up the nomination for a final vote. Sen. George Voinovich of
Ohio, a Republican who opposes Bolton's nomination, voted with the
Democrats. Under Senate rules, Republicans needed 60 of the senators' 100
votes to end debate, but they mustered only 54.

"They put partisanship ahead of the Constitution and the Senate's right
to receive information from the executive branch of government," Senate
Democratic leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Monday of the Bush
administration. "Unless the president comes forward with information
which we're certain we're constitutionally entitled to, Bolton will not
get enough votes" to end debate on his nomination and move to a decisive
vote, Reid said.

On Monday, White House officials told one key Democrat that they were
willing to provide some but not all of the material Democrats had
requested. Democrats refused the offer and cast their challenge to Bolton
as a defense of the Senate's institutional rights rather than the merits
of his nomination.

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansas...s/politics/119



Quack attack: quack, quack, quack, quack.



Clinton did a recess appointment of the Ambassador to Saudi Arabia...so
what's your point?




How many major appointments did Clinton make of candidates refused a vote
in the US Senate?


He made 56 recess appointments in the first 6 1/2 years of his Presidency.
I couldn't find statistics for the last year and half.

So how many did Bush make?




How many recess appointments to major positions did Clinton make of
candidates refused a vote in the US Senate?

And if you find any, the second question:

Three actually. James Hormel, Bill Lann Lee and Drew Days.

http://slate.msn.com/id/1002994/

You might find this interesting.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti...1/125050.shtml

How many recess appointments to major positions did Clinton make of
candidates TWICE refused a vote in the US senate?

One - James Hormel. - can't speak to Judge Gregory.

No dog in this hunt - carry on.

Later,

Tom

NOYB wrote:

Do your own research if you want to find the exact number. However, James
Hormel and Roger Gregory are two of the more high-profile individuals who
come to mind.

As suspected, NOYB blathers to protect his party, and can't offer the
numbers to back up his allegations.

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...

NOYB wrote:

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...


NOYB wrote:


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...



Posted on Mon, Jun. 20, 2005

Bush may bypass Senate as Democrats again block U.N. nominee

BY JAMES KUHNHENN
Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - (KRT) - Senate Democrats on Monday once again blocked
the nomination of John Bolton to be America's ambassador to the
United Nations, setting the stage for President Bush to consider
bypassing Senate confirmation by appointing Bolton while Congress is
on a weeklong July Fourth recess.

Democrats complained that the White House has refused to turn over
information about Bolton's activities while he was an official at the
State Department, which they say is crucial to determining his
fitness for the U.N. post.

Only three Democrats sided with Republicans in an attempt to end
debate and bring up the nomination for a final vote. Sen. George
Voinovich of Ohio, a Republican who opposes Bolton's nomination,
voted with the Democrats. Under Senate rules, Republicans needed 60
of the senators' 100 votes to end debate, but they mustered only 54.

"They put partisanship ahead of the Constitution and the Senate's
right to receive information from the executive branch of
government," Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Monday
of the Bush administration. "Unless the president comes forward with
information which we're certain we're constitutionally entitled to,
Bolton will not get enough votes" to end debate on his nomination and
move to a decisive vote, Reid said.

On Monday, White House officials told one key Democrat that they were
willing to provide some but not all of the material Democrats had
requested. Democrats refused the offer and cast their challenge to
Bolton as a defense of the Senate's institutional rights rather than
the merits of his nomination.

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansas...s/politics/119



Quack attack: quack, quack, quack, quack.



Clinton did a recess appointment of the Ambassador to Saudi
Arabia...so what's your point?




How many major appointments did Clinton make of candidates refused a
vote in the US Senate?


He made 56 recess appointments in the first 6 1/2 years of his
Presidency. I couldn't find statistics for the last year and half.

So how many did Bush make?




How many recess appointments to major positions did Clinton make of
candidates refused a vote in the US Senate?

And if you find any, the second question:

How many recess appointments to major positions did Clinton make of
candidates TWICE refused a vote in the US senate?


Do your own research if you want to find the exact number. However,
James Hormel and Roger Gregory are two of the more high-profile
individuals who come to mind.



We're talking major positions here, not ambassadorships to minor countries
and court appointments, in which all presidents engage.

You keep narrowing the scope of your question to fit your argument.


Many consider UN ambassador as a virtual cabinet-level position.

Many? Who's "many"?