![]() |
Interesting new boat
K. Smith wrote:
Gould 0738 wrote: I like the boat Chuck I really do, I certainly have no issue with it's origins, but I do find you now spruiking Chinese boats???? Spruiking? Yep spruiking all your so called reviews are not much better than paid advertising & given your priors about anything from the ROC I'll enjoy the NG review of your article very much. Why don't you take your "spruik", get a jar of K-Y, and shove it right you your as far as it will go. As for the boat?? as I said very nice however like all steel boats bought 'finished" you never know what lurks inside That's probably what your last date said...and penicillin has lost much of its effectiveness. |
Interesting new boat
Gould 0738 wrote:
I like the boat Chuck I really do, I certainly have no issue with it's origins, but I do find you now spruiking Chinese boats???? Spruiking? Yep spruiking all your so called reviews are not much better than paid advertising & given your priors about anything from the ROC I'll enjoy the NG review of your article very much. As for the boat?? as I said very nice however like all steel boats bought 'finished" you never know what lurks inside & even below the paint. Certainly there will be the endless claims about the hull prep etc which you will of course take hook line & sinker them propagate as fact in your article but ....... very risky buying a steel boat new or secondhand unless you factor into the pricing a complete reblast & paint, sad but true no matter where it's built. They're great for the owner builder because they "can" know exactly what's under the facade. Also as mentioned displacement speed boats travel @ knots not mph, I know when you are marketing as you always are it's a lower number but hey don't blame me, it's controlled by the diam of the earth & even you can't blame me for that!!! K Here's a harry lie still on the good ol' Dad theme for ya Chucky; "My father and his chief mechanic once crossed the Atlantic in winter in a 22'boat powered by twin outboards. Yes, it is possible, even the fuel. Got a "fireboat" welcome in NYC." I suppose a man of your intellect is wondering just where a simpleton like Harry got this lie from??? here (ever helpful I am:-)) is one of the articles he cherry picked the basics from. James R. Wynne, 1929-1990 - A Closer Look One of those fortunate people whose work and passion seem perfectly matched, Jim Wynne began racing powerboats as a hobby during his school years. He made the union between hobby and career official when he obtained a degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Florida, a Master’s from MIT and took his first job as chief test engineer for Kiekhaefer Corp. Jim supervised testing of Mercury outboard motors in Wisconsin and Florida until 1958, when he crewed on the first transatlantic crossing by an outboard-powered boat, traveling from Copenhagen to New York in a 22-foot boat. Damn those firetugs must have been busy greeting them back then!!! those endless 22 ftrs from Copenhagen must have looked like an invasion:-) OOps now I get it Jim was "Harry's" Dad's engineer!!! of course that explains the similarities, that or a whale falling out of space:-) More confirmation of Harry's denigration of his late Dad's life. His father lies are his worst lies as far as I'm concerned, the others & his stalking behaviour just confirm Harry himself as a failure; but to drag his late Dad in.... well that's really low. K I said it was interesting. It's a new boat, at least to this end of the country. Many people might not be aware of it. I also said the boat was imported, so what's the Aussie dung about "deceptive"? Mentioning this boat is on topic. No apologies from me. |
Interesting new boat
It is a beautiful boat. Has the lines that I like. I'll be looking forward to
your review this summer. Please send me an email when you're ready to put it out so I don't miss it. Thanks! If you come up this way to visit your brother in the next couple of months, give me a little warning and chance to arrange a couple of things and you might be able to ride along. Looking at a Sept or October time frame for the article, but we can take the boat out anytime prior. |
Interesting new boat
Yep spruiking all your so called reviews are not much better than paid
advertising & given your priors about anything from the ROC I'll enjoy the NG review of your article very much. By the way, I *own* a Chinese boat. Why the unprovoked insultathon, Karen? Put your evil twin back in the bottle. Valiant attempt to switch the topic from boats to your particular area of expertise, however. :-) |
Interesting new boat
Is this the same guy who lived about his Hatteras and posted on rec.boats
via a satellite modem? "jim--" wrote in message ... Hey, he single handedly sold $3 million in goods, at full retail, in 2 days when his Dad decided to part with the business. According to Harry he almost put the East Coast marine retailers out of business because of his cunning salesmanship skills. LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "John Smith" wrote in message news:bbAoc.36513$xw3.2429256@attbi_s04... The man feels his life is so incomplete and sad, that he is forced to live his life vicariously through his vivid imagination. His wife and dad would be very ashamed if they knew that he had to make up stories concerning their lives. "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... K. Smith wrote: Harry Krause wrote: K. Smith wrote: Harry Krause wrote: DSK wrote: Gould 0738 wrote: I got aboard a new 35' steel trawler today. The boat is being imported by a dealer in Olympia, WA. (snip for brevity) http://www2.yachtworld.com/capitalci...yyachts_2.html Cool, a Beuhler design in production. It's a good looking boat for sure and sounds like a lot of thoughtful touoches... but why *steel* for heaven's sake? Fair Skies- Doug King Puts lots of people to work. Hey hey hey in China it does:-) Yes, well, putting people to work is what the PRC wants. So if it is building pleasure boats out of steel, it is because it has skilled and semi-skilled metal fabricators who need work. Still telling lies I see Harry, Oh well at least these days everyone "knows" you're just a liar, even those who are syill stupid enough to be your groupies. Here's your lie of the day:-) K When referring to how he sold off his Dad's imaginary, absolutely no trace of, OMC dealership Tell me, crack-brain, where would *you* find traces of a boat dealership in Connecticut that closed about 30 years ago? You wouldn't know how. If you did, you would have come up with verification. It's easy enough to do; I could do it with one telephone call to a boat dealership in the area now owned by the son of a close friend of my father's. The close friend, probably also gone, started the boat business right after WW II, about the time my father opened up a dealership at his first location, on Water Street, near the train station in New Haven. More lies!! The sad thing is you're so obvious. What you are saying here is that you haven't the intellectual ability to prove me wrong. Here's another hint: the founder of the dealership I mentioned here is still alive, or at least was when his company's web page was completed. The business is run by a third-generation family member of his, apparently a grandson. I never knew until I read that web page today how the founder and my father met...but now I know...it was in the late 1940s. They shared a hobby and the venue to test their mettle with that hobby. With over 1,000 marine dealers in the US this story is hardly verifiable....but that is what you were counting on Krause, wasn't it? LMAO!! |
Interesting new boat
"John Smith" wrote in message news:NoCoc.80208$kh4.4747746@attbi_s52...
Is this the same guy who lived about his Hatteras and posted on rec.boats via a satellite modem? No, that would be ABOARD his Hatteras, you stupid putz. |
Interesting new boat
basskisser wrote:
"John Smith" wrote in message news:NoCoc.80208$kh4.4747746@attbi_s52... Is this the same guy who lived about his Hatteras and posted on rec.boats via a satellite modem? No, that would be ABOARD his Hatteras, you stupid putz. I love watching these righties build up their recollections. The last thing I would ever do is live aboard a boat. |
Interesting new boat
On Thu, 13 May 2004 01:17:56 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote: I can translate that for you. It's a secret but I'll do it anyway... =========================================== I can multiply and divide by 1.15 as well as anyone. My issue is with misleading boat performance hype. |
Interesting new boat
I thought you knew the difference but how can it be misleading? KPH are always
less than MPH so how could anyone advertise kmh to inflate the truth? If I'm selling a boat, I would say "WOT 34 MPH". "30 knots per hour" would/could make someone think the boat is slower if they didn't know. Dan Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 13 May 2004 01:17:56 GMT, Dan Krueger wrote: I can translate that for you. It's a secret but I'll do it anyway... =========================================== I can multiply and divide by 1.15 as well as anyone. My issue is with misleading boat performance hype. |
Interesting new boat
If I'm
selling a boat, I would say "WOT 34 MPH". "30 knots per hour" would/could make someone think the boat is slower if they didn't know. Faster boats are frequently logged in MPH. A fair number of mfgrs sell boats with speedometers that read in MPH. That's only "deceptive" if the boat doesn't actually travel that fast. Raymarine and other major electronics mfgrs build some pretty sophisticated and expensive DGPS equipment that is strictly for marine use, and they build in an option for the owner to show speeds in either MPH or knots. Somebody needs to get 'hold of Raymarine and insist they knock off selling that "deceptive" DGPS equipment that can be set to show speeds in MPH. On the other hand, trawlers are almost always described as turning speeds measured in knots. Deception would be recording a speed in MPH and then representing that it was knots. A speed measured in MPH and clearly labeled as such may not suit the personal preferences of some, but is hardly "deceptive" unless the reader or listener doesn't understand the difference between one standard and the other. I'm going to an Armadillo barbecue hosted by Billy Schumacher this Saturday. (There will be a couple of classic hydros, including Miss Bud, on hand). Billy's traveled one heck of a lot faster on (or slightly over) the water than 99.9999% of us ever will. I'll ask him whether unlimited hydros measure speed in knots or MPH. I know that both terms are fairly interchangeable when discussing aircraft, it will be fun to see what the protocol is for hydros. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com