Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Jim
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bush skips oath, as well as truth

http://www.newsday.com/news/columnis...7122823.column

Extract

He couldn't even watch Bush and Cheney at the 9/11 hearing yesterday
because they wouldn't show their faces in public at a hearing that was
supposed to be investigating how we in New York were hit. Bush and Cheney
have been saying that they didn't have even a troubling dream that the
attack was coming.

In the meeting yesterday, neither were under oath.

They should have been, for the only way they have out is to cheat and lie.

They also wanted no recordings; how can you insist that you never said it
this way or that way if they have it on tape?

Their testimony was behind closed doors, with no record, on a day during the
American crusade against Muslims in the Middle East. Ten U.S. dead, as last
night fell on New York.

These are the people running your country and a war that could have no end.
The new Vietnam? Of course not. Vietnam was only one country. This time, we
are up against a world religion. And your president and vice president would
not appear where they could be seen, their smirks, their glares, and they
would not speak under oath because that is obvious: if they lied, they could
be charged with perjury. They are yours. Good morning, suckers.


  #2   Report Post  
Harry Krause
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bush skips oath, as well as truth

Jim wrote:

http://www.newsday.com/news/columnis...7122823.column

Extract

He couldn't even watch Bush and Cheney at the 9/11 hearing yesterday
because they wouldn't show their faces in public at a hearing that was
supposed to be investigating how we in New York were hit. Bush and Cheney
have been saying that they didn't have even a troubling dream that the
attack was coming.

In the meeting yesterday, neither were under oath.

They should have been, for the only way they have out is to cheat and lie.

They also wanted no recordings; how can you insist that you never said it
this way or that way if they have it on tape?

Their testimony was behind closed doors, with no record, on a day during the
American crusade against Muslims in the Middle East. Ten U.S. dead, as last
night fell on New York.

These are the people running your country and a war that could have no end.
The new Vietnam? Of course not. Vietnam was only one country. This time, we
are up against a world religion. And your president and vice president would
not appear where they could be seen, their smirks, their glares, and they
would not speak under oath because that is obvious: if they lied, they could
be charged with perjury. They are yours. Good morning, suckers.



Kind of makes you want to puke. The POTUS and Vice POTUS, unwilling to
appear alone, unwilling to tell the truth, unwilling to let the voters
know how slime-coated they are.
  #3   Report Post  
Joe
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bush skips oath, as well as truth


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Kind of makes you want to puke. The POTUS and Vice POTUS, unwilling to
appear alone, unwilling to tell the truth, unwilling to let the voters
know how slime-coated they are.


Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed doors
with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security Advisor
Sandy Berger.




  #4   Report Post  
John Gaquin
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bush skips oath, as well as truth


"Joe" wrote in message
...


Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed

doors
with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security

Advisor
Sandy Berger.


I'm not sure if I'd want to acknowledge Mr. Bill as a precedent. The whole
world knows the level of honesty and integrity upon which he insisted as his
personal standard.


  #5   Report Post  
thunder
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bush skips oath, as well as truth

On Sun, 02 May 2004 20:14:01 -0400, John Gaquin wrote:

I'm not sure if I'd want to acknowledge Mr. Bill as a precedent. The
whole world knows the level of honesty and integrity upon which he
insisted as his personal standard.


That may be, but Kean said this of his testimony: "And he was just totally
frank -- totally frank, totally honest, and forthcoming." And Hamilton
said: "He was exceedingly generous with his time, very candid in his
discussions of even the most delicate kinds of relationships ..."

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/terro.../9-11_4-8.html


  #6   Report Post  
Harry Krause
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bush skips oath, as well as truth

John Gaquin wrote:

"Joe" wrote in message
...


Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed


doors

with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security


Advisor

Sandy Berger.



I'm not sure if I'd want to acknowledge Mr. Bill as a precedent. The whole
world knows the level of honesty and integrity upon which he insisted as his
personal standard.



Other than the fact that the country and the world was a lot better off
when Clinton was POUTS, that is.
  #7   Report Post  
Bert Robbins
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bush skips oath, as well as truth


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John Gaquin wrote:

"Joe" wrote in message
...


Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed


doors

with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security


Advisor

Sandy Berger.



I'm not sure if I'd want to acknowledge Mr. Bill as a precedent. The

whole
world knows the level of honesty and integrity upon which he insisted as

his
personal standard.



Other than the fact that the country and the world was a lot better off
when Clinton was POUTS, that is.


What do you mean better off? The world now knows that if they slap us, we
hit them. If they hit us, we punch them. If they punch us, we stab them.
And, if they stab us we will shoot them.

War is used when talking fails to persuade others.



  #8   Report Post  
Doug Kanter
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bush skips oath, as well as truth


"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"Joe" wrote in message
...


Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed

doors
with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security

Advisor
Sandy Berger.


I'm not sure if I'd want to acknowledge Mr. Bill as a precedent. The

whole
world knows the level of honesty and integrity upon which he insisted as

his
personal standard.



Did Clinton insist on Berger's presence during his meeting?

Did Bush or Cheney make the other's presence a requirement for their
testimony?


  #9   Report Post  
____m___~¿Ô___m____
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bush skips oath, as well as truth

Joe wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Kind of makes you want to puke. The POTUS and Vice POTUS, unwilling to
appear alone, unwilling to tell the truth, unwilling to let the voters
know how slime-coated they are.


Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed
doors with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security
Advisor Sandy Berger.


Did this concern matters of life and death?
Hell no, what kind of reasoning is this?

Clinton did it! Clinton did it! Clinton did it!
That boat's left port. Get over it.
--
_______m___õ¿~___m_________________________
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take,
but by the moments that take our breath away".
--George Carlin--

  #10   Report Post  
Harry Krause
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bush skips oath, as well as truth

Joe wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Kind of makes you want to puke. The POTUS and Vice POTUS, unwilling to
appear alone, unwilling to tell the truth, unwilling to let the voters
know how slime-coated they are.



Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed doors
with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security Advisor
Sandy Berger.





1. Clinton was not POTUS when 9-11 took place.
2. Clinton is not POTUS now.

Straw dog.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT - FLIP-FLOPPING MAY HAVE INJURED KERRY’S SHOULDER Henry Blackmoore General 3 April 7th 04 10:03 PM
( OT ) Creepier than Nixon -- Worse than Watergate Jim General 7 April 2nd 04 08:12 PM
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. NOYB General 23 February 6th 04 04:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017