BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Bush skips oath, as well as truth (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/4377-bush-skips-oath-well-truth.html)

Jim May 2nd 04 11:44 PM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
http://www.newsday.com/news/columnis...7122823.column

Extract

He couldn't even watch Bush and Cheney at the 9/11 hearing yesterday
because they wouldn't show their faces in public at a hearing that was
supposed to be investigating how we in New York were hit. Bush and Cheney
have been saying that they didn't have even a troubling dream that the
attack was coming.

In the meeting yesterday, neither were under oath.

They should have been, for the only way they have out is to cheat and lie.

They also wanted no recordings; how can you insist that you never said it
this way or that way if they have it on tape?

Their testimony was behind closed doors, with no record, on a day during the
American crusade against Muslims in the Middle East. Ten U.S. dead, as last
night fell on New York.

These are the people running your country and a war that could have no end.
The new Vietnam? Of course not. Vietnam was only one country. This time, we
are up against a world religion. And your president and vice president would
not appear where they could be seen, their smirks, their glares, and they
would not speak under oath because that is obvious: if they lied, they could
be charged with perjury. They are yours. Good morning, suckers.



Harry Krause May 3rd 04 12:08 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
Jim wrote:

http://www.newsday.com/news/columnis...7122823.column

Extract

He couldn't even watch Bush and Cheney at the 9/11 hearing yesterday
because they wouldn't show their faces in public at a hearing that was
supposed to be investigating how we in New York were hit. Bush and Cheney
have been saying that they didn't have even a troubling dream that the
attack was coming.

In the meeting yesterday, neither were under oath.

They should have been, for the only way they have out is to cheat and lie.

They also wanted no recordings; how can you insist that you never said it
this way or that way if they have it on tape?

Their testimony was behind closed doors, with no record, on a day during the
American crusade against Muslims in the Middle East. Ten U.S. dead, as last
night fell on New York.

These are the people running your country and a war that could have no end.
The new Vietnam? Of course not. Vietnam was only one country. This time, we
are up against a world religion. And your president and vice president would
not appear where they could be seen, their smirks, their glares, and they
would not speak under oath because that is obvious: if they lied, they could
be charged with perjury. They are yours. Good morning, suckers.



Kind of makes you want to puke. The POTUS and Vice POTUS, unwilling to
appear alone, unwilling to tell the truth, unwilling to let the voters
know how slime-coated they are.

Joe May 3rd 04 12:54 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Kind of makes you want to puke. The POTUS and Vice POTUS, unwilling to
appear alone, unwilling to tell the truth, unwilling to let the voters
know how slime-coated they are.


Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed doors
with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security Advisor
Sandy Berger.





John Gaquin May 3rd 04 01:14 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

"Joe" wrote in message
...


Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed

doors
with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security

Advisor
Sandy Berger.


I'm not sure if I'd want to acknowledge Mr. Bill as a precedent. The whole
world knows the level of honesty and integrity upon which he insisted as his
personal standard.



____m___~¿Ô___m____ May 3rd 04 01:41 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
Joe wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Kind of makes you want to puke. The POTUS and Vice POTUS, unwilling to
appear alone, unwilling to tell the truth, unwilling to let the voters
know how slime-coated they are.


Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed
doors with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security
Advisor Sandy Berger.


Did this concern matters of life and death?
Hell no, what kind of reasoning is this?

Clinton did it! Clinton did it! Clinton did it!
That boat's left port. Get over it.
--
_______m___õ¿~___m_________________________
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take,
but by the moments that take our breath away".
--George Carlin--


Dustin May 3rd 04 02:15 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

We're talking about the President of the United States of America, so
I would hope the President is treated with respect not for the man he
is (because anyone can question that), but for the position he
represents. Whether it's George Bush, Bill Clinton, or whoever, the
office is to be respected.

If the commission finds that the President is responsible and/or
liable for what happened on 9/11, at that point in time he should be
subject to a complete hearing. Requiring the President to be subject
to a complete hearing with a sworn oath and in front of the public is
disgraceful to our country, especially in the eyes of other countries
that hate us. I'm not saying it should never be done, but there's a
process in reaching that point that requires a lot of data gathering
and parsing of those results (which we're doing now).

And you suggest our latest war is worse than Vietnam? Well, I think
it's way too premature to decide that, because we don't know what
events will unfold. But you're right, over time we may find this
whole war on terror to be much greater than the Vietnam War.

Nonetheless, the region and world religion you're worried about
upsetting is responsible for several attempts at blowing up the world
trade center, the USS Cole, several embassies around the world, etc.
I'm not too worried about upsetting them, because I think they already
are.

-Dustin

On Sun, 02 May 2004 22:44:43 GMT, "Jim" wrote:

http://www.newsday.com/news/columnis...7122823.column

Extract

He couldn't even watch Bush and Cheney at the 9/11 hearing yesterday
because they wouldn't show their faces in public at a hearing that was
supposed to be investigating how we in New York were hit. Bush and Cheney
have been saying that they didn't have even a troubling dream that the
attack was coming.

In the meeting yesterday, neither were under oath.

They should have been, for the only way they have out is to cheat and lie.

They also wanted no recordings; how can you insist that you never said it
this way or that way if they have it on tape?

Their testimony was behind closed doors, with no record, on a day during the
American crusade against Muslims in the Middle East. Ten U.S. dead, as last
night fell on New York.

These are the people running your country and a war that could have no end.
The new Vietnam? Of course not. Vietnam was only one country. This time, we
are up against a world religion. And your president and vice president would
not appear where they could be seen, their smirks, their glares, and they
would not speak under oath because that is obvious: if they lied, they could
be charged with perjury. They are yours. Good morning, suckers.



thunder May 3rd 04 02:16 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
On Sun, 02 May 2004 20:14:01 -0400, John Gaquin wrote:

I'm not sure if I'd want to acknowledge Mr. Bill as a precedent. The
whole world knows the level of honesty and integrity upon which he
insisted as his personal standard.


That may be, but Kean said this of his testimony: "And he was just totally
frank -- totally frank, totally honest, and forthcoming." And Hamilton
said: "He was exceedingly generous with his time, very candid in his
discussions of even the most delicate kinds of relationships ..."

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/terro.../9-11_4-8.html

thunder May 3rd 04 02:32 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
On Mon, 03 May 2004 01:15:31 +0000, Dustin wrote:


We're talking about the President of the United States of America, so I
would hope the President is treated with respect not for the man he is
(because anyone can question that), but for the position he represents.
Whether it's George Bush, Bill Clinton, or whoever, the office is to be
respected.


That is easily overlooked after the damage several of our recent office
holders have done to the office, but I would agree that there is something
demeaning to the office by the act of swearing to tell the truth. We
should be able to assume the President is telling the truth.

Dustin May 3rd 04 02:45 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

Heh yeah in a sense you're right, this ideal view of the presidency is
definitely not the same as it was many years ago. I think it weakens
the country when our president is seen on television being forced to
answer questions in an interrogation, no doubt. But the true fault
lies in the people who put these characters in office. I was one who
voted for Bush because I felt the alternative was much, much worse
(picturing Al Gore handling 9/11 is extremely scary), but lets face
it, we haven't had a reasonable candidate to vote for since the US
population became truly incompetent and elections started being
decided based on who has the "presidential look" on television and of
course the media bias.

On Sun, 02 May 2004 21:32:37 -0400, thunder
wrote:

On Mon, 03 May 2004 01:15:31 +0000, Dustin wrote:


We're talking about the President of the United States of America, so I
would hope the President is treated with respect not for the man he is
(because anyone can question that), but for the position he represents.
Whether it's George Bush, Bill Clinton, or whoever, the office is to be
respected.


That is easily overlooked after the damage several of our recent office
holders have done to the office, but I would agree that there is something
demeaning to the office by the act of swearing to tell the truth. We
should be able to assume the President is telling the truth.



Harry Krause May 3rd 04 02:47 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
Joe wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Kind of makes you want to puke. The POTUS and Vice POTUS, unwilling to
appear alone, unwilling to tell the truth, unwilling to let the voters
know how slime-coated they are.



Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed doors
with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security Advisor
Sandy Berger.





1. Clinton was not POTUS when 9-11 took place.
2. Clinton is not POTUS now.

Straw dog.

Harry Krause May 3rd 04 02:48 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
John Gaquin wrote:

"Joe" wrote in message
...


Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed


doors

with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security


Advisor

Sandy Berger.



I'm not sure if I'd want to acknowledge Mr. Bill as a precedent. The whole
world knows the level of honesty and integrity upon which he insisted as his
personal standard.



Other than the fact that the country and the world was a lot better off
when Clinton was POUTS, that is.

Harry Krause May 3rd 04 02:50 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
thunder wrote:

On Mon, 03 May 2004 01:15:31 +0000, Dustin wrote:


We're talking about the President of the United States of America, so I
would hope the President is treated with respect not for the man he is
(because anyone can question that), but for the position he represents.
Whether it's George Bush, Bill Clinton, or whoever, the office is to be
respected.



That is easily overlooked after the damage several of our recent office
holders have done to the office, but I would agree that there is something
demeaning to the office by the act of swearing to tell the truth. We
should be able to assume the President is telling the truth.



Not of the POTUS is Busn, and not when he is dissembling about his war
mongering.

Bert Robbins May 3rd 04 03:16 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Joe wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Kind of makes you want to puke. The POTUS and Vice POTUS, unwilling to
appear alone, unwilling to tell the truth, unwilling to let the voters
know how slime-coated they are.



Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed

doors
with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security

Advisor
Sandy Berger.





1. Clinton was not POTUS when 9-11 took place.


But, he was POTUS for the previous eight years when the terrorists kept
hitting us without us hitting back.

2. Clinton is not POTUS now.


But, he wants to be.

Why is his book coming out this year of all years and just prior to the
Democratic National Convention?

Straw dog.


Clinton sure like dogs.



Bert Robbins May 3rd 04 03:20 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John Gaquin wrote:

"Joe" wrote in message
...


Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed


doors

with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security


Advisor

Sandy Berger.



I'm not sure if I'd want to acknowledge Mr. Bill as a precedent. The

whole
world knows the level of honesty and integrity upon which he insisted as

his
personal standard.



Other than the fact that the country and the world was a lot better off
when Clinton was POUTS, that is.


What do you mean better off? The world now knows that if they slap us, we
hit them. If they hit us, we punch them. If they punch us, we stab them.
And, if they stab us we will shoot them.

War is used when talking fails to persuade others.




John Smith May 3rd 04 03:58 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
If Clinton had followed up on WTC Bombing 1, the Cole, the US Embassy
bombings while he was in office, there never would have been a 911
terrorist attack.

Clinton's inaction to the previous terrorist attacks is the reason 911 was
planned and the pilots were trained while he was the president..


Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Joe wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Kind of makes you want to puke. The POTUS and Vice POTUS, unwilling to
appear alone, unwilling to tell the truth, unwilling to let the voters
know how slime-coated they are.



Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed

doors
with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security

Advisor
Sandy Berger.





1. Clinton was not POTUS when 9-11 took place.
2. Clinton is not POTUS now.

Straw dog.




thunder May 3rd 04 04:23 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
On Mon, 03 May 2004 02:58:00 +0000, John Smith wrote:

If Clinton had followed up on WTC Bombing 1, the Cole, the US Embassy
bombings while he was in office, there never would have been a 911
terrorist attack.

Clinton's inaction to the previous terrorist attacks is the reason 911 was
planned and the pilots were trained while he was the president..


Not to defend Clinton, but I seem to recall bin Laden is still been
missin'. Perhaps if this administration wasn't distracted by Iraq, the
SOB wouldn't be.

Harry Krause May 3rd 04 10:33 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

John Gaquin wrote:


"Joe" wrote in message
. ..


Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed

doors


with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security

Advisor


Sandy Berger.


I'm not sure if I'd want to acknowledge Mr. Bill as a precedent. The


whole

world knows the level of honesty and integrity upon which he insisted as


his

personal standard.



Other than the fact that the country and the world was a lot better off
when Clinton was POUTS, that is.



What do you mean better off? The world now knows that if they slap us, we
hit them. If they hit us, we punch them. If they punch us, we stab them.
And, if they stab us we will shoot them.

War is used when talking fails to persuade others.




What a simple-minded jackass you are, Bertie. We're far worse off today
than we were in the Clinton years by almost any standard of measure.
And, as far as your testosterone-based foreign policy goes, we're
hitting, punching, stabbing and shooting people in a country that did
not attack us.

And we're not very good at it, either.

Bert Robbins May 3rd 04 12:37 PM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

John Gaquin wrote:


"Joe" wrote in message
. ..


Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed

doors


with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security

Advisor


Sandy Berger.


I'm not sure if I'd want to acknowledge Mr. Bill as a precedent. The


whole

world knows the level of honesty and integrity upon which he insisted

as

his

personal standard.



Other than the fact that the country and the world was a lot better off
when Clinton was POUTS, that is.



What do you mean better off? The world now knows that if they slap us,

we
hit them. If they hit us, we punch them. If they punch us, we stab them.
And, if they stab us we will shoot them.

War is used when talking fails to persuade others.




What a simple-minded jackass you are, Bertie. We're far worse off today
than we were in the Clinton years by almost any standard of measure.
And, as far as your testosterone-based foreign policy goes, we're
hitting, punching, stabbing and shooting people in a country that did
not attack us.


Prove it.

Our standard of living is higher. We are feared by our adversaries.

Saddam had ties to terrorist organizations.

And we're not very good at it, either.


From your constant harping about the number of dead, military and civilian,
friend and foe, we are pretty good at it.



basskisser May 3rd 04 12:52 PM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
"Joe" wrote in message .. .
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Kind of makes you want to puke. The POTUS and Vice POTUS, unwilling to
appear alone, unwilling to tell the truth, unwilling to let the voters
know how slime-coated they are.


Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed doors
with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security Advisor
Sandy Berger.


Is Clinton our current president? Is Clinton the person who sent our
troops to Iraq under more than one utter lie?

basskisser May 3rd 04 12:53 PM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
"John Smith" wrote in message news:Yyilc.19023$0H1.1840410@attbi_s54...
If Clinton had followed up on WTC Bombing 1, the Cole, the US Embassy
bombings while he was in office, there never would have been a 911
terrorist attack.


How do you know this? What proof do you have of this?

Bert Robbins May 3rd 04 01:39 PM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
news:c3dhc2g=.727dc9da1e306c5ead050e6cdb2dbe40@108 3586099.nulluser.com...
Bert Robbins wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

John Gaquin wrote:


"Joe" wrote in message
. ..


Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind

closed

doors


with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National

Security

Advisor


Sandy Berger.


I'm not sure if I'd want to acknowledge Mr. Bill as a precedent.

The

whole

world knows the level of honesty and integrity upon which he

insisted
as

his

personal standard.



Other than the fact that the country and the world was a lot

better off
when Clinton was POUTS, that is.


What do you mean better off? The world now knows that if they slap

us,
we
hit them. If they hit us, we punch them. If they punch us, we stab

them.
And, if they stab us we will shoot them.

War is used when talking fails to persuade others.




What a simple-minded jackass you are, Bertie. We're far worse off

today
than we were in the Clinton years by almost any standard of measure.
And, as far as your testosterone-based foreign policy goes, we're
hitting, punching, stabbing and shooting people in a country that did
not attack us.


Prove it.



Prove what? That Iraq didn't attack us? Is that your basis of reality
these days? That we can do what we want with impunity, even to the point
of starting a war against a country where we have no proof it attacked
us? This is morally acceptable to you? Then you are a scumbag.


If we had not been attacked numerous times throughout the '90's we would not
have had a reason to go into Afganistan and back to Iraq to enforce UN
resolutions.


Our standard of living is higher.


Tell that to the 2.5 million Americans who lost their jobs under Bush,
and the 44 million Americans without health insurance.


Who ever said that everybody had to have whatever they wanted? If you
employer does not provide health insurance then you need to find another
employer that does. The health field is going to crumble under the weight of
the employer premiums, soon employers will stop paying for retirees health
insurance and then they will stop paying for all health insurance.

We are feared by our adversaries.


We were always feared by our adversaries. Now, we are out of control and
feared by everyone. There will be payback.


As long as people leave us alone we will not have to make war on them.


Saddam had ties to terrorist organizations.\


So do many members of the Bush misAdministration.


And the UN.

And we're not very good at it, either.


From your constant harping about the number of dead, military and

civilian,
friend and foe, we are pretty good at it.



We're good at taking on the weak military forces of craphole countries,
and we're good at killing civilians. We're lousy at taking on well-led,
dedicated military forces. We haven't won a war against a real adversary
since WW II.


Well, our cold war against the Soviet's, your brothers in arms, was won by
us. The next major agressor will be China and they have their own problems.



Tuuk May 3rd 04 02:14 PM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
Jim ,,,

Your not too smart are you?









"Jim" wrote in message
...

http://www.newsday.com/news/columnis...7122823.column

Extract

He couldn't even watch Bush and Cheney at the 9/11 hearing yesterday
because they wouldn't show their faces in public at a hearing that was
supposed to be investigating how we in New York were hit. Bush and Cheney
have been saying that they didn't have even a troubling dream that the
attack was coming.

In the meeting yesterday, neither were under oath.

They should have been, for the only way they have out is to cheat and lie.

They also wanted no recordings; how can you insist that you never said it
this way or that way if they have it on tape?

Their testimony was behind closed doors, with no record, on a day during

the
American crusade against Muslims in the Middle East. Ten U.S. dead, as

last
night fell on New York.

These are the people running your country and a war that could have no

end.
The new Vietnam? Of course not. Vietnam was only one country. This time,

we
are up against a world religion. And your president and vice president

would
not appear where they could be seen, their smirks, their glares, and they
would not speak under oath because that is obvious: if they lied, they

could
be charged with perjury. They are yours. Good morning, suckers.





Doug Kanter May 3rd 04 06:22 PM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"Joe" wrote in message
...


Clinton's testimony was not under oath and was conducted behind closed

doors
with two others, his lawyer Bruce Lindsey and his National Security

Advisor
Sandy Berger.


I'm not sure if I'd want to acknowledge Mr. Bill as a precedent. The

whole
world knows the level of honesty and integrity upon which he insisted as

his
personal standard.



Did Clinton insist on Berger's presence during his meeting?

Did Bush or Cheney make the other's presence a requirement for their
testimony?



Doug Kanter May 3rd 04 06:23 PM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...


Our standard of living is higher.


How do you figure?



NOYB May 5th 04 05:09 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

Our standard of living is higher.


Tell that to the 2.5 million Americans who lost their jobs under Bush


Why do you continue to perpetuate this lie? You used to say the number was
at 3 million, when in fact the number never exceeded 2.65 million. Now the
number is down to 1.89 million...and has showed a downward trend for 7
consecutive months. Of course, those numbers are from Payroll Survey Data
and thus ignore people who are newly self-employed and people working for
new start-up companies. If you include those folks, there's been a net
*gain* in jobs under Bush. You, of course, cherry pick the stats that come
closest to substantiating your lies.

Your lies just aren't being believed by Americans any longer. 2 months ago,
Kerry held anywhere from an 8 to 12 point lead in most polls when people
were asked which candidate they trusted more with the economy and creating
jobs. In just two months, Bush has passed Kerry in both of those areas.



Harry Krause May 5th 04 10:34 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message


Our standard of living is higher.


Tell that to the 2.5 million Americans who lost their jobs under Bush



Why do you continue to perpetuate this lie?



Go peddle your Bush-**** somewhere else.

Tuuk May 5th 04 01:33 PM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
'""" Go peddle your Bush-**** somewhere else."''''


Come on harry, why don't you go peddle your pro Saddam and terrorist ****
and anti Bush **** somewhere else yourself? This is not a traitor newsgroup,
this is not a Saddam newsgroup, this is not a pro terrorism newsgroup either
but you sure support your side most publicly and aggressively.

GYHAS









"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message


Our standard of living is higher.

Tell that to the 2.5 million Americans who lost their jobs under Bush



Why do you continue to perpetuate this lie?



Go peddle your Bush-**** somewhere else.




NOYB May 5th 04 05:39 PM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

" Tuuk" wrote in message
...
'""" Go peddle your Bush-**** somewhere else."''''


Come on harry, why don't you go peddle your pro Saddam and terrorist ****
and anti Bush **** somewhere else yourself? This is not a traitor

newsgroup,
this is not a Saddam newsgroup, this is not a pro terrorism newsgroup

either
but you sure support your side most publicly and aggressively.

GYHAS









"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message


Our standard of living is higher.

Tell that to the 2.5 million Americans who lost their jobs under Bush


Why do you continue to perpetuate this lie?



Go peddle your Bush-**** somewhere else.


Harry has been selling bull**** for so long that he can no longer tell the
truth from the lies.

Notice how he is unable to cite any references for his 2.5 million person
claim?



John Smith May 5th 04 10:19 PM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
...
You, of course, cherry pick the stats that come
closest to substantiating your lies.


NOYB,
Harry has such a long history of making up so many lies he can't remember
what the truth is. If it isn't about Bush and the Republicans it is about
his Hatteras and his satellite modem that allowed him to live on board his
Hatteras and still make over 100 posts a day, or his 36' lobster boat, or
his wife who is a MD and PHD, when in fact, she is a social worker.

The man is a very insecure person.





jim-- May 5th 04 10:28 PM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:qTcmc.29953$_41.2216238@attbi_s02...

"NOYB" wrote in message
...
You, of course, cherry pick the stats that come
closest to substantiating your lies.


NOYB,
Harry has such a long history of making up so many lies he can't remember
what the truth is. If it isn't about Bush and the Republicans it is about
his Hatteras and his satellite modem that allowed him to live on board his
Hatteras and still make over 100 posts a day, or his 36' lobster boat, or
his wife who is a MD and PHD, when in fact, she is a social worker.

The man is a very insecure person.





I am sure the nurses at the nursing home let him *pilot* his rubber boat
when he is taking his weekly bath.



jim-- May 5th 04 11:26 PM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:
"John Smith" wrote in message
news:qTcmc.29953$_41.2216238@attbi_s02...

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

You, of course, cherry pick the stats that come
closest to substantiating your lies.


NOYB,
Harry has such a long history of making up so many lies he can't

remember
what the truth is. If it isn't about Bush and the Republicans it is

about
his Hatteras and his satellite modem that allowed him to live on board

his
Hatteras and still make over 100 posts a day, or his 36' lobster boat,

or
his wife who is a MD and PHD, when in fact, she is a social worker.

The man is a very insecure person.






I am sure the nurses at the nursing home let him *pilot* his rubber boat
when he is taking his weekly bath.



Still boatless in Cleveland, right, Dennis? And you'll probably die that
way and in that place. Blech.


Actually I am in process of purchasing a smaller boat for my own use, mainly
for fishing and daytrips.

Are the nurses treating you OK Harry? Probably time for your meds. Make
sure to say hello to Doctor Doctor for me. ;-)



Harry Krause May 5th 04 11:27 PM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

jim-- wrote:

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:qTcmc.29953$_41.2216238@attbi_s02...


"NOYB" wrote in message
...


You, of course, cherry pick the stats that come
closest to substantiating your lies.


NOYB,
Harry has such a long history of making up so many lies he can't


remember

what the truth is. If it isn't about Bush and the Republicans it is


about

his Hatteras and his satellite modem that allowed him to live on board


his

Hatteras and still make over 100 posts a day, or his 36' lobster boat,


or

his wife who is a MD and PHD, when in fact, she is a social worker.

The man is a very insecure person.






I am sure the nurses at the nursing home let him *pilot* his rubber boat
when he is taking his weekly bath.



Still boatless in Cleveland, right, Dennis? And you'll probably die that
way and in that place. Blech.



Actually I am in process of purchasing a smaller boat for my own use, mainly
for fishing and daytrips.




In your above-ground pool, no doubt.

jim-- May 5th 04 11:36 PM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

jim-- wrote:

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:qTcmc.29953$_41.2216238@attbi_s02...


"NOYB" wrote in message
...


You, of course, cherry pick the stats that come
closest to substantiating your lies.


NOYB,
Harry has such a long history of making up so many lies he can't


remember

what the truth is. If it isn't about Bush and the Republicans it is


about

his Hatteras and his satellite modem that allowed him to live on board


his

Hatteras and still make over 100 posts a day, or his 36' lobster boat,


or

his wife who is a MD and PHD, when in fact, she is a social worker.

The man is a very insecure person.






I am sure the nurses at the nursing home let him *pilot* his rubber

boat
when he is taking his weekly bath.



Still boatless in Cleveland, right, Dennis? And you'll probably die that
way and in that place. Blech.



Actually I am in process of purchasing a smaller boat for my own use,

mainly
for fishing and daytrips.




In your above-ground pool, no doubt.


You obviously know nothing about the Great Lakes. But I always thought you
were the ignorant type....you continue to prove me right. ;-)



Harry Krause May 5th 04 11:43 PM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

jim-- wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


jim-- wrote:


"John Smith" wrote in message
news:qTcmc.29953$_41.2216238@attbi_s02...



"NOYB" wrote in message
...



You, of course, cherry pick the stats that come
closest to substantiating your lies.


NOYB,
Harry has such a long history of making up so many lies he can't

remember


what the truth is. If it isn't about Bush and the Republicans it is

about


his Hatteras and his satellite modem that allowed him to live on board

his


Hatteras and still make over 100 posts a day, or his 36' lobster boat,

or


his wife who is a MD and PHD, when in fact, she is a social worker.

The man is a very insecure person.






I am sure the nurses at the nursing home let him *pilot* his rubber


boat

when he is taking his weekly bath.



Still boatless in Cleveland, right, Dennis? And you'll probably die that
way and in that place. Blech.


Actually I am in process of purchasing a smaller boat for my own use,


mainly

for fishing and daytrips.




In your above-ground pool, no doubt.



You obviously know nothing about the Great Lakes. But I always thought you
were the ignorant type....you continue to prove me right. ;-)




Puh-lease, Dennis, you're just a flaming ass, nothing more, and you have
no future as anything else.


jim-- May 5th 04 11:57 PM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

jim-- wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


jim-- wrote:


"John Smith" wrote in message
news:qTcmc.29953$_41.2216238@attbi_s02...



"NOYB" wrote in message
...



You, of course, cherry pick the stats that come
closest to substantiating your lies.


NOYB,
Harry has such a long history of making up so many lies he can't

remember


what the truth is. If it isn't about Bush and the Republicans it is

about


his Hatteras and his satellite modem that allowed him to live on

board

his


Hatteras and still make over 100 posts a day, or his 36' lobster

boat,

or


his wife who is a MD and PHD, when in fact, she is a social worker.

The man is a very insecure person.






I am sure the nurses at the nursing home let him *pilot* his rubber


boat

when he is taking his weekly bath.



Still boatless in Cleveland, right, Dennis? And you'll probably die

that
way and in that place. Blech.


Actually I am in process of purchasing a smaller boat for my own use,


mainly

for fishing and daytrips.



In your above-ground pool, no doubt.



You obviously know nothing about the Great Lakes. But I always thought

you
were the ignorant type....you continue to prove me right. ;-)




Puh-lease, Dennis, you're just a flaming ass, nothing more, and you have
no future as anything else.


As per you MO, you flame the person when you cannot respond intelligently.
Very predictable. ;-)



jim-- May 6th 04 12:16 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

jim-- wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


jim-- wrote:



"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...



jim-- wrote:



"John Smith" wrote in message
news:qTcmc.29953$_41.2216238@attbi_s02...




"NOYB" wrote in message
...




You, of course, cherry pick the stats that come
closest to substantiating your lies.


NOYB,
Harry has such a long history of making up so many lies he can't

remember



what the truth is. If it isn't about Bush and the Republicans it

is

about



his Hatteras and his satellite modem that allowed him to live on


board

his



Hatteras and still make over 100 posts a day, or his 36' lobster


boat,

or



his wife who is a MD and PHD, when in fact, she is a social

worker.

The man is a very insecure person.






I am sure the nurses at the nursing home let him *pilot* his rubber

boat


when he is taking his weekly bath.



Still boatless in Cleveland, right, Dennis? And you'll probably die


that

way and in that place. Blech.


Actually I am in process of purchasing a smaller boat for my own use,

mainly


for fishing and daytrips.



In your above-ground pool, no doubt.


You obviously know nothing about the Great Lakes. But I always thought


you

were the ignorant type....you continue to prove me right. ;-)




Puh-lease, Dennis, you're just a flaming ass, nothing more, and you have
no future as anything else.



As per you MO, you flame the person when you cannot respond

intelligently.
Very predictable. ;-)




Dennis, you dumfoch, I've stated here at least 20 times that I have no
interest whatsoever in the political or societal opinions of right-wing
trash like you. If I put up a post on something political, and you want
to try to dispute it, go right ahead...I don't care. I'm not interested
in "debating" rifht-wing trash.


As per you MO, you flame the person when you cannot respond intelligently.
Very predictable. ;-)



Bert Robbins May 6th 04 12:58 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

jim-- wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


jim-- wrote:



"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...



jim-- wrote:



"John Smith" wrote in message
news:qTcmc.29953$_41.2216238@attbi_s02...




"NOYB" wrote in message
...




You, of course, cherry pick the stats that come
closest to substantiating your lies.


NOYB,
Harry has such a long history of making up so many lies he can't

remember



what the truth is. If it isn't about Bush and the Republicans it

is

about



his Hatteras and his satellite modem that allowed him to live on


board

his



Hatteras and still make over 100 posts a day, or his 36' lobster


boat,

or



his wife who is a MD and PHD, when in fact, she is a social

worker.

The man is a very insecure person.






I am sure the nurses at the nursing home let him *pilot* his rubber

boat


when he is taking his weekly bath.



Still boatless in Cleveland, right, Dennis? And you'll probably die


that

way and in that place. Blech.


Actually I am in process of purchasing a smaller boat for my own use,

mainly


for fishing and daytrips.



In your above-ground pool, no doubt.


You obviously know nothing about the Great Lakes. But I always thought


you

were the ignorant type....you continue to prove me right. ;-)




Puh-lease, Dennis, you're just a flaming ass, nothing more, and you have
no future as anything else.



As per you MO, you flame the person when you cannot respond

intelligently.
Very predictable. ;-)




Dennis, you dumfoch, I've stated here at least 20 times that I have no
interest whatsoever in the political or societal opinions of right-wing
trash like you. If I put up a post on something political, and you want
to try to dispute it, go right ahead...I don't care. I'm not interested
in "debating" rifht-wing trash.


That's because Harry can't debate. Harry goes from assertion to flaming too
quickly to be able to hold a conversation or debate.

And, he can't resist trashing and flaming people that don't agree with his
positions.



Harry Krause May 6th 04 01:59 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 
Bert Robbins wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

jim-- wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


jim-- wrote:



"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...



jim-- wrote:




"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...




jim-- wrote:




"John Smith" wrote in message
news:qTcmc.29953$_41.2216238@attbi_s02. ..





"NOYB" wrote in message
...





You, of course, cherry pick the stats that come
closest to substantiating your lies.


NOYB,
Harry has such a long history of making up so many lies he can't

remember




what the truth is. If it isn't about Bush and the Republicans it


is

about




his Hatteras and his satellite modem that allowed him to live on

board


his




Hatteras and still make over 100 posts a day, or his 36' lobster

boat,


or




his wife who is a MD and PHD, when in fact, she is a social


worker.

The man is a very insecure person.






I am sure the nurses at the nursing home let him *pilot* his rubber

boat



when he is taking his weekly bath.



Still boatless in Cleveland, right, Dennis? And you'll probably die

that


way and in that place. Blech.


Actually I am in process of purchasing a smaller boat for my own use,

mainly



for fishing and daytrips.



In your above-ground pool, no doubt.


You obviously know nothing about the Great Lakes. But I always thought

you


were the ignorant type....you continue to prove me right. ;-)




Puh-lease, Dennis, you're just a flaming ass, nothing more, and you have
no future as anything else.



As per you MO, you flame the person when you cannot respond


intelligently.

Very predictable. ;-)




Dennis, you dumfoch, I've stated here at least 20 times that I have no
interest whatsoever in the political or societal opinions of right-wing
trash like you. If I put up a post on something political, and you want
to try to dispute it, go right ahead...I don't care. I'm not interested
in "debating" rifht-wing trash.



That's because Harry can't debate. Harry goes from assertion to flaming too
quickly to be able to hold a conversation or debate.



Nah. It's because I think your opinions are without merit and not worthy
of attention or discussion. Why would I want to waste any time
"debating" a fool like you whose mind rusted shut years ago? What's in
it for me?

It's far more fun to sit back and watch the extremes you fools go to to
"defend" the Smirking Chimp, no matter how wrong he is or how many lies
he tells or how bad his policies are for this country and the world.

John Smith May 6th 04 02:41 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Harry has such a long history of making up so many lies he can't

remember
what the truth is. If it isn't about Bush and the Republicans it is

about
his Hatteras and his satellite modem that allowed him to live on board

his
Hatteras and still make over 100 posts a day, or his 36' lobster boat,

or
his wife who is a MD and PHD, when in fact, she is a social worker.

The man is a very insecure person.


I am sure the nurses at the nursing home let him *pilot* his rubber boat
when he is taking his weekly bath.


Still boatless in Cleveland, right, Dennis? And you'll probably die that
way and in that place. Blech.


At least jim-- is comfortable enough with his wife and himself he does not
have to make up elaborate stories to boost his weak ego. You life must suck
that you can not accept what you and your wife have accomplished.





Bert Robbins May 6th 04 02:46 AM

Bush skips oath, as well as truth
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

jim-- wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


jim-- wrote:



"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...



jim-- wrote:




"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...




jim-- wrote:




"John Smith" wrote in message
news:qTcmc.29953$_41.2216238@attbi_s02. ..





"NOYB" wrote in message
...





You, of course, cherry pick the stats that come
closest to substantiating your lies.


NOYB,
Harry has such a long history of making up so many lies he can't

remember




what the truth is. If it isn't about Bush and the Republicans

it

is

about




his Hatteras and his satellite modem that allowed him to live on

board


his




Hatteras and still make over 100 posts a day, or his 36' lobster

boat,


or




his wife who is a MD and PHD, when in fact, she is a social


worker.

The man is a very insecure person.






I am sure the nurses at the nursing home let him *pilot* his

rubber

boat



when he is taking his weekly bath.



Still boatless in Cleveland, right, Dennis? And you'll probably

die

that


way and in that place. Blech.


Actually I am in process of purchasing a smaller boat for my own

use,

mainly



for fishing and daytrips.



In your above-ground pool, no doubt.


You obviously know nothing about the Great Lakes. But I always

thought

you


were the ignorant type....you continue to prove me right. ;-)




Puh-lease, Dennis, you're just a flaming ass, nothing more, and you

have
no future as anything else.



As per you MO, you flame the person when you cannot respond


intelligently.

Very predictable. ;-)




Dennis, you dumfoch, I've stated here at least 20 times that I have no
interest whatsoever in the political or societal opinions of right-wing
trash like you. If I put up a post on something political, and you want
to try to dispute it, go right ahead...I don't care. I'm not interested
in "debating" rifht-wing trash.



That's because Harry can't debate. Harry goes from assertion to flaming

too
quickly to be able to hold a conversation or debate.



Nah. It's because I think your opinions are without merit and not worthy
of attention or discussion. Why would I want to waste any time
"debating" a fool like you whose mind rusted shut years ago? What's in
it for me?

It's far more fun to sit back and watch the extremes you fools go to to
"defend" the Smirking Chimp, no matter how wrong he is or how many lies
he tells or how bad his policies are for this country and the world.


Dance puppet boy, dance!




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com