"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message news:ceZkc.9049

John, Don't confuse Don with facts.


Don can't deal with facts.

Well, John, in two different topics you've managed to offer nothing at all
of substance.

He spouts this high school drivel, then changes
the wording in your response, thinking he's being oh-so-clever. It never
dawns on him that far more lucid minds than his own thought this stuff
through 300 years ago and discarded it.

Cite?

Probably lives in a survivalist
camp somewhere.

You live a majority of your life with no regard to gov't, John.
(though that option is fast disappearing)
Sort of a self enacted anarchy.
If smaller gov't is a good thing than it stands to reason the absence of
gov't is even better.
The fact is that gov'ts *force* others to do it's bidding, and the people
that believe in such a thing are guilty of a mob mentality lacking in
individuality.
Are you part of the mob, John?

"Don" wrote in message news:TI7lc.613

He spouts this high school drivel, then changes
the wording in your response, thinking he's being oh-so-clever.

Cite?

Two of my previous posts, wherein you altered my words so you could
construct what you thought was a witty rejoinder.



If smaller gov't is a good thing .....

And it is.

than it stands to reason the absence of
gov't is even better.

Fallacious reasoning. No supportive data, no logical progression.