| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
OT--WMD's may still be found
We should start a new policy, if a terrorist wants to strike the US he has
to strike the area that voted for the current president. "NOYB" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message thlink.net... Should we invade there next or should it be Iran? Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not be a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from the rest of the Middle East. Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to describe how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those sexy action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get some fresh air..... Would you like to send your children? Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1 years old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13 years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes. I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old enough to be drafted. Perhaps the next target will be in SW Florida, where knobs-for-brains lives. Harry, You've been wishing a terrorist strike down here for awhile. As much as you and I disagree, I'd never wish that on you nor any another American. You need some instruction in language. I'm not wishing anything. I feel in my gut we are going to be attacked again by terrorists, and *if* it does, I think it should be in "Bush Country," rather than in the more civilized parts of the nation. "More civilized parts"? LOL. You're a piece of work... |
OT--WMD's may still be found
With attitudes like John's you don't have to wonder why the Democrats are
loosing. "John Smith" wrote in message news:YYgkc.866$NI6.172886@attbi_s01... We should start a new policy, if a terrorist wants to strike the US he has to strike the area that voted for the current president. "NOYB" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message thlink.net... Should we invade there next or should it be Iran? Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not be a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from the rest of the Middle East. Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to describe how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those sexy action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get some fresh air..... Would you like to send your children? Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1 years old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13 years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes. I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old enough to be drafted. Perhaps the next target will be in SW Florida, where knobs-for-brains lives. Harry, You've been wishing a terrorist strike down here for awhile. As much as you and I disagree, I'd never wish that on you nor any another American. You need some instruction in language. I'm not wishing anything. I feel in my gut we are going to be attacked again by terrorists, and *if* it does, I think it should be in "Bush Country," rather than in the more civilized parts of the nation. "More civilized parts"? LOL. You're a piece of work... |
OT--WMD's may still be found
Nah, that we would only allow them to attack Bush Country while Bush is in
office. If Kerry wins the next election, they would have to bomb Krause. ; ) (tongue firmly in cheek) "Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... With attitudes like John's you don't have to wonder why the Democrats are loosing. "John Smith" wrote in message news:YYgkc.866$NI6.172886@attbi_s01... We should start a new policy, if a terrorist wants to strike the US he has to strike the area that voted for the current president. "NOYB" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message thlink.net... Should we invade there next or should it be Iran? Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not be a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from the rest of the Middle East. Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to describe how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those sexy action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get some fresh air..... Would you like to send your children? Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1 years old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13 years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes. I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old enough to be drafted. Perhaps the next target will be in SW Florida, where knobs-for-brains lives. Harry, You've been wishing a terrorist strike down here for awhile. As much as you and I disagree, I'd never wish that on you nor any another American. You need some instruction in language. I'm not wishing anything. I feel in my gut we are going to be attacked again by terrorists, and *if* it does, I think it should be in "Bush Country," rather than in the more civilized parts of the nation. "More civilized parts"? LOL. You're a piece of work... |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
... Doug Kanter wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... Should we invade there next or should it be Iran? Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not be a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from the rest of the Middle East. Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to describe how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those sexy action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get some fresh air..... Would you like to send your children? Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1 years old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13 years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes. I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old enough to be drafted. Perhaps the next target will be in SW Florida, where knobs-for-brains lives. I hope not. Too many innocent alligators and pelicans. I love pelicans. |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net... Nobody needs the damn oil if they can't afford it. Being able to afford it has nothing to do with whether or not you need it. It would be interesting to have a real leader, you know? One who'd use a TV appearance as follows: Mah fellow Americans.....I was sittin' out behind the White House yesterday sippin' a beer and I had this here idea. What if every one of us kept a list of every time we used our cars for a month, and then found a way to eliminulate..elimemonade....get rid of maybe 20% of those trips, or even maybe 1 out of 5? Even if we only did it for 6 months or half a year, do ya think we could appraise some pressure on the Saudis that way and get 'em to lower the price of oil? Y'all heard of surprise & demand, right?" Do you suppose most patriots could walk the walk and do this? |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"Son of Spam" wrote in message
om... "Joe" wrote in message ... "jps" wrote in message ... Not WMDs, fertilizer bombs. Ingredients available in large quantities worldwide. The same variety that took 160 innocent men, women and children's lives in Oklahoma City by one of our own. jps They were not "fertilizer bombs" as used in Oklahoma City. There was nerve gas in the mix. That is yet to be determined. The only positive identification of the chemicals I have seen stated that a "large portion" of the mix was just sulfuric acid, which seems to indicate that the attackers simply wanted to contaminate the area with toxic chemicals. My ex-neighbor is a fireman. He was trained to deal with chemicals like that. This guy's an idiot and HE could handle it. I'd be real surprised if sulfuric acid could create the kind of Armageddon our government makes it out to be. |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net... Who is Chris Matthews? What station? You're kidding, right? He worked for several Presidential administrations, and is one of the top news talk show hosts in the country...on MSNBC. Not everyone lives their lives based on television. |
OT--WMD's may still be found
|
OT--WMD's may still be found
jps wrote in message ... The doc's compassion reaches as far as his own family. He's fully supportive of compassionately sending someone else's kids to die or be maimed but I guarantee his kids would be counseled by nobby to apply for deferments. Probably dental school or hemmoroids. I'd probably see NOYB's kids up here trying to avoid any future draft. Talk is cheap! |
OT--WMD's may still be found
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4868468/
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates - A purported message from the al-Qaida operative Abu-Musab al-Zarqawi said Friday his group did not plan a chemical weapons attack as the Jordanian authorities have alleged. "The (allegation) that there was a chemical bomb to kill thousands of people is a mere lie," the reported voice of al-Zarqawi says on a tape broadcast via an Islamic site on the Internet. "God knows, if we did possess (a chemical bomb), we wouldn't hesitate one second to use it to hit Israeli cities such as Eilat and Tel Aviv," the voice said. "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... How about we talk about the al Qaeda terrorist who was caught trying to detonate a chemical bomb in Jordan recently? ABC World News Now. April 27, 2004 In an interview broadcast by ABC's World News Now, the leader of the Al Qaeda cell organizing the explosive and chemical attack on the Jordanian security headquarters and the American Embassy in Jordan stated that he received his training from Al-Zawahiri in Iraq, prior to the fall of Afghanistan. -------------------------------------------------- The War on Terrorism and the War in Iraq are one and the same. |
OT--WMD's may still be found
And don't forget they will be marked made in America with a 2004 production
date!! "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... November 1st, 2004. Gaaaaaar-on-teed. |
OT--WMD's may still be found
Might help if you quoted everything Senator Kerry said, rather than just
what you wanted to hear.. MATTHEWS: You‘ve spoken at length and very completely about the how question. But why do you think we went to war? If there was exaggeration of WMD, exaggeration of the danger, exaggeration implicitly with the connection of al Qaeda and 9/11, what‘s the motive for this? What‘s the why? Why did Bush and Cheney and the ideologues around take us to war? Why do you think they did it? KERRY: It appears, as they peel away the weapons of mass destruction issue—and we may yet find them, Chris. Look, I want to make it clear. Who knows if a month from now, three months from now, you find some weapons? You may. But you certainly didn‘t find them where they said they were. And you certainly didn‘t find them in the quantities that they said they were. And they weren‘t found—I‘ve talked to some soldiers who‘ve come back, who trained against the potential of artillery delivery, because artillery was the way that they had previously delivered and it was the only way they knew they could deliver. Now we found nothing that is evidence of that kind of delivery. So the fact is that, as you peeled away, I think it comes down to this larger ideological, neo-con concept of fundamental change in the region and who knows whether there are other motives with respect to Saddam Hussein. But they did it because they thought they could. Because they misjudged exactly what the reaction would be and what they could get away with. And they did it, that misjudgment, against the warnings of countless numbers of people, including General Shinseki, who they then isolated and tarnished. They did it against the warnings of Brent Scowcroft, Jim Baker, others. They did it against the warnings of his father in his book about why they didn‘t go in. And they did it against the warnings of many of us who said winning the war is not the complicated part. It‘s winning the peace that‘s complicated. And I think presidents need to be held accountable for those kinds of decisions. "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... To quote a high-ranking government official quoted on 4/27/04: "It appears, as they peel away the weapons of mass destruction issue - and we may yet find them...Look, I want to make it clear. Who knows if a month from now, three months from now, you find some weapons? You may." |
OT--WMD's may still be found
|
OT--WMD's may still be found
"jps" wrote in message ... Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1 years old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13 years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes. Bottom line: You'd prefer to send other people's kids to die or be maimed, either physically or mentally or both. Just yesterday, the State Dept. released a report showing that international terrorist incidents reached their lowest level since the late 1960's. The report also made mention of the fact that they didn't "count" the attacks made against our troops in Iraq, because those attacks were made against combatants. The decline in terrorist incidents must be from one of two things: 1) we've been pretty successful in our war on terrorism or 2) the terrorists haved focused their attacks on our armed troops...people who are much better equipped to fight back than civilians in the WTC Since you liberals refuse to acknowledge that Bush's war on terrorism has been pretty darned successful, then that means you have to credit the drop to reason number 2 mentioned above. If that's the case, then I'll ask you: Wouldn't you rather the attacks be directed against our forces (who are better trained and equipped to defend themselves) than some innocent American just going about his/her daily life? |
OT--WMD's may still be found
wrote in message k.net... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4868468/ DUBAI, United Arab Emirates - A purported message from the al-Qaida operative Abu-Musab al-Zarqawi said Friday his group did not plan a chemical weapons attack as the Jordanian authorities have alleged. "The (allegation) that there was a chemical bomb to kill thousands of people is a mere lie," the reported voice of al-Zarqawi says on a tape broadcast via an Islamic site on the Internet. al-Zarqawi? On an Islamic internet site? ROTFLMAO! Why would *they* lie? |
OT--WMD's may still be found
He's an author and international journalist...who was also an aide and
speechwriter to Jimmy Carter, and a top aide to Tip O'Neill. He's not just a TV personality. "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... Who is Chris Matthews? What station? You're kidding, right? He worked for several Presidential administrations, and is one of the top news talk show hosts in the country...on MSNBC. Not everyone lives their lives based on television. |
OT--WMD's may still be found
wrote in message .net... KERRY: It appears, as they peel away the weapons of mass destruction issue-and we may yet find them, Chris. Look, I want to make it clear. Who knows if a month from now, three months from now, you find some weapons? You may. The rest is just political campaigning. The segment that I posted is just another example of Kerry trying to "cover all of his bases" and be on both sides of every issue. If weapons are found in September, then Kerry can say "see Chris! I told you there was a chance we might still find them." |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"NOYB" wrote in message
... "jps" wrote in message ... Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1 years old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13 years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes. Bottom line: You'd prefer to send other people's kids to die or be maimed, either physically or mentally or both. Just yesterday, the State Dept. released a report showing that international terrorist incidents reached their lowest level since the late 1960's. The report also made mention of the fact that they didn't "count" the attacks made against our troops in Iraq, because those attacks were made against combatants. The decline in terrorist incidents must be from one of two things: 1) we've been pretty successful in our war on terrorism or 2) the terrorists haved focused their attacks on our armed troops...people who are much better equipped to fight back than civilians in the WTC Since you liberals refuse to acknowledge that Bush's war on terrorism has been pretty darned successful, then that means you have to credit the drop to reason number 2 mentioned above. If that's the case, then I'll ask you: Wouldn't you rather the attacks be directed against our forces (who are better trained and equipped to defend themselves) than some innocent American just going about his/her daily life? Yes. However, it would be even one step better if we'd learn to stop recreating the problem over and over again, and if the comfortables, like you, would entertain the right amount of rage when your leaders choose NOT to learn. |
OT--WMD's may still be found
Ancient history. Today, he's a TV personality.
Do you ever shut off the TV for an entire week and think for yourself? "NOYB" wrote in message ... He's an author and international journalist...who was also an aide and speechwriter to Jimmy Carter, and a top aide to Tip O'Neill. He's not just a TV personality. "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... Who is Chris Matthews? What station? You're kidding, right? He worked for several Presidential administrations, and is one of the top news talk show hosts in the country...on MSNBC. Not everyone lives their lives based on television. |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"NOYB" wrote in message ... wrote in message .net... KERRY: It appears, as they peel away the weapons of mass destruction issue-and we may yet find them, Chris. Look, I want to make it clear. Who knows if a month from now, three months from now, you find some weapons? You may. The rest is just political campaigning. The segment that I posted is just another example of Kerry trying to "cover all of his bases" and be on both sides of every issue. If weapons are found in September, then Kerry can say "see Chris! I told you there was a chance we might still find them." More than likely, he knows they will be found |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Ancient history. Today, he's a TV personality. Do you ever shut off the TV for an entire week and think for yourself? I didn't see the program. I read the transcript on the internet. I've already told you that I rarely watch TV. |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"Paul Fritz" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ... wrote in message .net... KERRY: It appears, as they peel away the weapons of mass destruction issue-and we may yet find them, Chris. Look, I want to make it clear. Who knows if a month from now, three months from now, you find some weapons? You may. The rest is just political campaigning. The segment that I posted is just another example of Kerry trying to "cover all of his bases" and be on both sides of every issue. If weapons are found in September, then Kerry can say "see Chris! I told you there was a chance we might still find them." More than likely, he knows they will be found Of course he knows. |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"NOYB" wrote Since you liberals refuse to acknowledge that Bush's war on terrorism has been pretty darned successful, How about conservatives that think Bush's so called war on terrorism has been a farce? |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"NOYB" wrote in message ... wrote in message k.net... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4868468/ DUBAI, United Arab Emirates - A purported message from the al-Qaida operative Abu-Musab al-Zarqawi said Friday his group did not plan a chemical weapons attack as the Jordanian authorities have alleged. "The (allegation) that there was a chemical bomb to kill thousands of people is a mere lie," the reported voice of al-Zarqawi says on a tape broadcast via an Islamic site on the Internet. al-Zarqawi? On an Islamic internet site? ROTFLMAO! Why would *they* lie? Why would the US gov't lie? LOL |
OT--WMD's may still be found
Yeah, he scares you to death. LOL
"NOYB" wrote in message ... He's an author and international journalist...who was also an aide and speechwriter to Jimmy Carter, and a top aide to Tip O'Neill. He's not just a TV personality. "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... Who is Chris Matthews? What station? You're kidding, right? He worked for several Presidential administrations, and is one of the top news talk show hosts in the country...on MSNBC. Not everyone lives their lives based on television. |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"NOYB" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Ancient history. Today, he's a TV personality. Do you ever shut off the TV for an entire week and think for yourself? I didn't see the program. I read the transcript on the internet. I've already told you that I rarely watch TV. Uh-huh. Your words betray you. In other words, you're a lying *******. All you do is parrot the press. |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"NOYB" wrote If weapons are found in September, Step back, away from the krakpipe, and put your hands in the air..... |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ... "jps" wrote in message ... Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1 years old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13 years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes. Bottom line: You'd prefer to send other people's kids to die or be maimed, either physically or mentally or both. Just yesterday, the State Dept. released a report showing that international terrorist incidents reached their lowest level since the late 1960's. The report also made mention of the fact that they didn't "count" the attacks made against our troops in Iraq, because those attacks were made against combatants. The decline in terrorist incidents must be from one of two things: 1) we've been pretty successful in our war on terrorism or 2) the terrorists haved focused their attacks on our armed troops...people who are much better equipped to fight back than civilians in the WTC Since you liberals refuse to acknowledge that Bush's war on terrorism has been pretty darned successful, then that means you have to credit the drop to reason number 2 mentioned above. If that's the case, then I'll ask you: Wouldn't you rather the attacks be directed against our forces (who are better trained and equipped to defend themselves) than some innocent American just going about his/her daily life? Yes. However, it would be even one step better if we'd learn to stop recreating the problem over and over again, and if the comfortables, like you, would entertain the right amount of rage when your leaders choose NOT to learn. NOYB is cowardly, is glad Bush forces others to fight his battles, so that NYOB can sit on his fat ass and watch mainstream TV. He should be drafted and sent to Iraq, so he can be stripped naked and tortured and raped, then killed. |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"Don" wrote in message news:Sg%kc.596 ...... He should be drafted and sent to Iraq, so he can be stripped naked and tortured and raped, then killed. Now there's an intellect for the ages. |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Don" wrote in message news:Sg%kc.596 ...... He should be drafted and sent to Iraq, so he can be stripped naked and tortured and raped, then killed. Now there's an intellect for the ages. People should be submitted to the exact same thing they submit others to. What goes around...... |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"Don" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote Since you liberals refuse to acknowledge that Bush's war on terrorism has been pretty darned successful, How about conservatives that think Bush's so called war on terrorism has been a farce? You are now venturing in the dangerous area known as "truth". |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"NOYB" wrote in message
... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Ancient history. Today, he's a TV personality. Do you ever shut off the TV for an entire week and think for yourself? I didn't see the program. I read the transcript on the internet. I've already told you that I rarely watch TV. Does everything need to be spelled out for you? Do you ever turn off EVERYTHING and think for yourself? |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"Don" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote Since you liberals refuse to acknowledge that Bush's war on terrorism has been pretty darned successful, How about conservatives that think Bush's so called war on terrorism has been a farce? How'd you get through my killfile filter? Bye Don. |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Ancient history. Today, he's a TV personality. Do you ever shut off the TV for an entire week and think for yourself? I didn't see the program. I read the transcript on the internet. I've already told you that I rarely watch TV. Does everything need to be spelled out for you? Do you ever turn off EVERYTHING and think for yourself? Doug, The point of my post had nothing to do with Chris Matthews nor his opinion. It had to do with a statement made by John Kerry...and since I don't get a newspaper (why would I if it's on the internet), turning off my TV, internet, and radio would mean I'd receive no news at all. Then what could we talk about? Boats? |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"NOYB" wrote in message k.net... "Don" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote Since you liberals refuse to acknowledge that Bush's war on terrorism has been pretty darned successful, How about conservatives that think Bush's so called war on terrorism has been a farce? How'd you get through my killfile filter? Bye Don. But doctor, there ARE conservatives who think the war is a farce, and your boy's economic "thoughts" (?) too. |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Ancient history. Today, he's a TV personality. Do you ever shut off the TV for an entire week and think for yourself? I didn't see the program. I read the transcript on the internet. I've already told you that I rarely watch TV. Does everything need to be spelled out for you? Do you ever turn off EVERYTHING and think for yourself? Doug, The point of my post had nothing to do with Chris Matthews nor his opinion. It had to do with a statement made by John Kerry...and since I don't get a newspaper (why would I if it's on the internet), turning off my TV, internet, and radio would mean I'd receive no news at all. Then what could we talk about? Boats? I've read that at Andy Grove's (of Intel) first or second place of employment, people would whisper about why the guy spent to much time looking out the window. They were told to leave him alone because whenever he looked out the window, he came up with a good idea. No TV, no internet, just the window. |
OT--WMD's may still be found
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Ancient history. Today, he's a TV personality. Do you ever shut off the TV for an entire week and think for yourself? I didn't see the program. I read the transcript on the internet. I've already told you that I rarely watch TV. Does everything need to be spelled out for you? Do you ever turn off EVERYTHING and think for yourself? Doug, The point of my post had nothing to do with Chris Matthews nor his opinion. It had to do with a statement made by John Kerry...and since I don't get a newspaper (why would I if it's on the internet), turning off my TV, internet, and radio would mean I'd receive no news at all. Then what could we talk about? Boats? I've read that at Andy Grove's (of Intel) first or second place of employment, people would whisper about why the guy spent to much time looking out the window. They were told to leave him alone because whenever he looked out the window, he came up with a good idea. No TV, no internet, just the window. I have no windows in my office. (To save you the trouble of posting it: "Maybe that's the problem". Right? ;-)) |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:52 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com