"John Smith" wrote in message news:zrZhc.5803$_L6.668305@attbi_s53...
Harry, There is no proof that you are not a serial murderer or a child
molester, but it would be foolish for anyone to suggest you were either.

That's odd, John Smith! YOU seem to think it's okay for YOU to post
wild allegations and assumptions about others here, and present them
as fact. Of course, then, when asked to show some form of evidence of
such, you quickly try to change the course of action. Need some proof
of your wild allegations?

From: John Smith )
Subject: Good News, Good News, Good News

View this article only
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-09 15:11:36 PST
Is that why you started smoking pot?

Have any evidence of me smoking pot? See? No proof, so, as YOU stated
above, it's foolish of you!

And this one, again proving that you are calling YOURSELF "foolish":

From: John Smith )
Subject: Pentagon Hires Comical Ali
View: Complete Thread (104 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-18 05:35:51 PST

The best part about Basskisser's argument is the definition he
provided told
him why Schnapps is not a whiskey, but he must have been too stoned to
be
able to read it.

Or this one. Once again, remember, you stated above that if there is
no proof of someone's allegations, then they are foolish for making
such:

From: John Smith )
Subject: OT Oh no! What next?
View: Complete Thread (151 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-14 10:11:50 PST

NOYB,
You need to be nice to basskisser, he suffers from FAS, and is self
medicating with pot.

Get the point, fool?

BK,
Here is your proof:

http://www.google.com/groups?safe=im...sser&lr=&hl=en


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"John Smith" wrote in message
news:zrZhc.5803$_L6.668305@attbi_s53...
Harry, There is no proof that you are not a serial murderer or a child
molester, but it would be foolish for anyone to suggest you were either.

That's odd, John Smith! YOU seem to think it's okay for YOU to post
wild allegations and assumptions about others here, and present them
as fact. Of course, then, when asked to show some form of evidence of
such, you quickly try to change the course of action. Need some proof
of your wild allegations?

From: John Smith )
Subject: Good News, Good News, Good News

View this article only
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-09 15:11:36 PST
Is that why you started smoking pot?

Have any evidence of me smoking pot? See? No proof, so, as YOU stated
above, it's foolish of you!

And this one, again proving that you are calling YOURSELF "foolish":

From: John Smith )
Subject: Pentagon Hires Comical Ali
View: Complete Thread (104 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-18 05:35:51 PST

The best part about Basskisser's argument is the definition he
provided told
him why Schnapps is not a whiskey, but he must have been too stoned to
be
able to read it.

Or this one. Once again, remember, you stated above that if there is
no proof of someone's allegations, then they are foolish for making
such:

From: John Smith )
Subject: OT Oh no! What next?
View: Complete Thread (151 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-14 10:11:50 PST

NOYB,
You need to be nice to basskisser, he suffers from FAS, and is self
medicating with pot.

Get the point, fool?

"Calif Bill" wrote
"Don" wrote
"Calif Bill" wrote
At least Bush served. More than a lot of politco's and union head's
sons did.

As if that's a good thing.
The militaries take advantage of youthful naivete and most of them get
out
after their first term.
If you had *served* you would already know this.

Did you serve?

Yes.

I went in in 1965. Air Force.

Serving in the military is no longer honorable because the soldiers are
little more than global thugs.

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Don" wrote in message
...

"Calif Bill" wrote
At least Bush served. More than a lot of politco's and union head's
sons
did.

As if that's a good thing.
The militaries take advantage of youthful naivete and most of them get
out
after their first term.
If you had *served* you would already know this.

Based upon the new Democrat philosophy if you didn't serve in the military
you have no right to quesiton those that did.

I am not a Democrat and I will question whatever I choose.

So, did you serve in the
military?

Four years, 75th Ranger Bn.

"Don" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote
"Don" wrote
"Calif Bill" wrote
At least Bush served. More than a lot of politco's and union head's
sons did.

As if that's a good thing.
The militaries take advantage of youthful naivete and most of them get
out
after their first term.
If you had *served* you would already know this.

Did you serve?

Yes.

I went in in 1965. Air Force.

Serving in the military is no longer honorable because the soldiers are
little more than global thugs.



I think that describes the administration perfectly, but not the majority of
the soldiers. I will say, though, that anyone who believes success was
likely has chosen not to learn from history. As we all know, that's always a
mistake. Our tactics didn't work in the Phillippines or Vietnam. They will
never work.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
news:c3dhc2g=.311f7f08d561cbb15e7a80c9c0f01fc4@108 2721942.nulluser.com...
Doug Kanter wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
news
It was a compliment to the aforementioned soldiers. Did you miss
that?



It was a knock on some reservists. Bush was a reservist. He
could
have
been called up. But end of Vietnam came along, and the military
was
looking
more at downsizing, than bringing up more people.

1) It wasn't intended as a knock on reservists.
2) Please don't mention Bush in the same discussion as real
citizens.
Things
will go better that way.



At least Bush served. More than a lot of politco's and union head's
sons
did.



Go to the blackboard and write 1000 times "Not everything revolves
around
Harry". :-)



Au contraire, at least for most of the right-wing pondscum that pollutes
this newsgroup! All I have to do is toss out one tiny piece of bait, and
dozens of right-wing low-brain output types jump out of their trees to
defend Bush, racism, corporate greed, xenophobia, drug companies,
abortion clinic bombers, right-wing terrorists, the attorney general,
Rush, faux news, and women who stay home and keep themselves barefoot
and pregnant, ad nauseum. Why, without me, they wouldn't be able to
exchange their lack-of-witticisms, bad grammar, bad spelling, and bad
thoughts.


Bill here has a problem because he tried to make it as a general
contractor in California, but couldn't get the licenses he needed
because he was unable to obtain workman's compensation insurance. He
blames the requirement for that kind of insurance on the union movement.
So, instead, he scrounged his living by taking on odd contracting jobs
and visiting "shape-ups" early the morning where he could find
unemployed men he could "hire" off the books and exploit because they
were desperate for the few dollars he'd pay.

Bill's anti-union because the union movement was a minor impediment in
his desire to take advantage of the working class.


Your still full of **** Harry. You could not make it in the real world, so
you rode the backs of working men and women as a union organizer and hack to
be able to buy expensive custom boats, while they have to go on strike,
giving up income while you still collect your excessive lucre. And anybody
here can get workers comp. Just pay the money.

"Don" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote
"Don" wrote
"Calif Bill" wrote
At least Bush served. More than a lot of politco's and union head's
sons did.

As if that's a good thing.
The militaries take advantage of youthful naivete and most of them get
out
after their first term.
If you had *served* you would already know this.

Did you serve?

Yes.

I went in in 1965. Air Force.

Serving in the military is no longer honorable because the soldiers are
little more than global thugs.



I bet you said the same thing about Viet Nam era soldiers. Did you serve in
the military or Peace Corp?

"John Smith" wrote in message news:oa8ic.10560$aQ6.865067@attbi_s51...
BK,
Here is your proof:

Of WHAT??? That you post wild allegations and assumptions, and present
them as fact? Hell, everybody here KNOWS you do that..now everybody
knows that you think that it is foolish to do so.

http://www.google.com/groups?safe=im...sser&lr=&hl=en


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"John Smith" wrote in message
news:zrZhc.5803$_L6.668305@attbi_s53...
Harry, There is no proof that you are not a serial murderer or a child
molester, but it would be foolish for anyone to suggest you were either.

That's odd, John Smith! YOU seem to think it's okay for YOU to post
wild allegations and assumptions about others here, and present them
as fact. Of course, then, when asked to show some form of evidence of
such, you quickly try to change the course of action. Need some proof
of your wild allegations?

From: John Smith )
Subject: Good News, Good News, Good News

View this article only
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-09 15:11:36 PST
Is that why you started smoking pot?

Have any evidence of me smoking pot? See? No proof, so, as YOU stated
above, it's foolish of you!

And this one, again proving that you are calling YOURSELF "foolish":

From: John Smith )
Subject: Pentagon Hires Comical Ali
View: Complete Thread (104 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-18 05:35:51 PST

The best part about Basskisser's argument is the definition he
provided told
him why Schnapps is not a whiskey, but he must have been too stoned to
be
able to read it.

Or this one. Once again, remember, you stated above that if there is
no proof of someone's allegations, then they are foolish for making
such:

From: John Smith )
Subject: OT Oh no! What next?
View: Complete Thread (151 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-14 10:11:50 PST

NOYB,
You need to be nice to basskisser, he suffers from FAS, and is self
medicating with pot.

Get the point, fool?

"Don" wrote in message news:1nbic.2415

Serving in the military is no longer honorable because the soldiers are
little more than global thugs.

That's an asinine thing to say.

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:22:08 -0400, "Don" wrote:


"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Don" wrote in message
...

"Calif Bill" wrote
At least Bush served. More than a lot of politco's and union head's
sons
did.

As if that's a good thing.
The militaries take advantage of youthful naivete and most of them get
out
after their first term.
If you had *served* you would already know this.

Based upon the new Democrat philosophy if you didn't serve in the military
you have no right to quesiton those that did.

I am not a Democrat and I will question whatever I choose.

So, did you serve in the
military?

Four years, 75th Ranger Bn.

Bull****. Rangers display more sense.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!