Curtis CCR wrote:

Harry Krause wrote in message ...

Bill wrote:


"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Bert Robbins wrote:



"Curtis CCR" wrote in message
ogle.com...



"Jim" wrote in message

.. .



http://www.johnkerry.com/about/military_records.html

Does anyone think Bush will do the same?

You mean see what little he can release and not get called for it?
Kerry didn't release anything until he was beat up to do so. Not that
I think Bush and anything closed to a stellar miltary record... but
Bush released more military records that Kerry did... and Bush did it
over two months ago.


Kerry still hasn't released his medical report for his first Purple

Heart.


Why are you still harping on a man who earned a Silver Star and a Bronze
Star, Bertie...did you? Did Bush?


Earn the Cross or The Medal and you will have lots of respect.


I think you Demo Liberals need to look at the web sites again you posted.
Their is no (repeat NO for those who can't see)
report on his medical records for John Kerry. So what's your point..


Where are the results of Bush's weekly random substance abuse screens.
It's the least we can ask of a alcoholic, cocaine user like Bush.


Do such screens exist, Harry? "Weekly?" "Random?" If he was getting
tested weekly, it wouldn't be random. Oh but wait.... these "weekly
random substance abuse screens" are just something you made up.




Of course there can be weekly substance abuse screens, and they can be
random.

Is Bush tested? Doubtful. But he ought to be. He's an alcholic and
druggie, and there's no proof he's clean.

Harry, There is no proof that you are not a serial murderer or a child
molester, but it would be foolish for anyone to suggest you were either.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Curtis CCR wrote:

Harry Krause wrote in message
...

Bill wrote:


"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Bert Robbins wrote:



"Curtis CCR" wrote in message
ogle.com...



"Jim" wrote in message

.. .



http://www.johnkerry.com/about/military_records.html

Does anyone think Bush will do the same?

You mean see what little he can release and not get called for it?
Kerry didn't release anything until he was beat up to do so. Not
that
I think Bush and anything closed to a stellar miltary record... but
Bush released more military records that Kerry did... and Bush did
it
over two months ago.


Kerry still hasn't released his medical report for his first Purple

Heart.


Why are you still harping on a man who earned a Silver Star and a
Bronze
Star, Bertie...did you? Did Bush?


Earn the Cross or The Medal and you will have lots of respect.


I think you Demo Liberals need to look at the web sites again you
posted.
Their is no (repeat NO for those who can't see)
report on his medical records for John Kerry. So what's your point..


Where are the results of Bush's weekly random substance abuse screens.
It's the least we can ask of a alcoholic, cocaine user like Bush.


Do such screens exist, Harry? "Weekly?" "Random?" If he was getting
tested weekly, it wouldn't be random. Oh but wait.... these "weekly
random substance abuse screens" are just something you made up.




Of course there can be weekly substance abuse screens, and they can be
random.

Is Bush tested? Doubtful. But he ought to be. He's an alcholic and
druggie, and there's no proof he's clean.

"John Smith" wrote in message news:zrZhc.5803$_L6.668305@attbi_s53...
Harry, There is no proof that you are not a serial murderer or a child
molester, but it would be foolish for anyone to suggest you were either.

That's odd, John Smith! YOU seem to think it's okay for YOU to post
wild allegations and assumptions about others here, and present them
as fact. Of course, then, when asked to show some form of evidence of
such, you quickly try to change the course of action. Need some proof
of your wild allegations?

From: John Smith )
Subject: Good News, Good News, Good News

View this article only
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-09 15:11:36 PST
Is that why you started smoking pot?

Have any evidence of me smoking pot? See? No proof, so, as YOU stated
above, it's foolish of you!

And this one, again proving that you are calling YOURSELF "foolish":

From: John Smith )
Subject: Pentagon Hires Comical Ali
View: Complete Thread (104 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-18 05:35:51 PST

The best part about Basskisser's argument is the definition he
provided told
him why Schnapps is not a whiskey, but he must have been too stoned to
be
able to read it.

Or this one. Once again, remember, you stated above that if there is
no proof of someone's allegations, then they are foolish for making
such:

From: John Smith )
Subject: OT Oh no! What next?
View: Complete Thread (151 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-14 10:11:50 PST

NOYB,
You need to be nice to basskisser, he suffers from FAS, and is self
medicating with pot.

Get the point, fool?

BK,
Here is your proof:

http://www.google.com/groups?safe=im...sser&lr=&hl=en


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"John Smith" wrote in message
news:zrZhc.5803$_L6.668305@attbi_s53...
Harry, There is no proof that you are not a serial murderer or a child
molester, but it would be foolish for anyone to suggest you were either.

That's odd, John Smith! YOU seem to think it's okay for YOU to post
wild allegations and assumptions about others here, and present them
as fact. Of course, then, when asked to show some form of evidence of
such, you quickly try to change the course of action. Need some proof
of your wild allegations?

From: John Smith )
Subject: Good News, Good News, Good News

View this article only
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-09 15:11:36 PST
Is that why you started smoking pot?

Have any evidence of me smoking pot? See? No proof, so, as YOU stated
above, it's foolish of you!

And this one, again proving that you are calling YOURSELF "foolish":

From: John Smith )
Subject: Pentagon Hires Comical Ali
View: Complete Thread (104 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-18 05:35:51 PST

The best part about Basskisser's argument is the definition he
provided told
him why Schnapps is not a whiskey, but he must have been too stoned to
be
able to read it.

Or this one. Once again, remember, you stated above that if there is
no proof of someone's allegations, then they are foolish for making
such:

From: John Smith )
Subject: OT Oh no! What next?
View: Complete Thread (151 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-14 10:11:50 PST

NOYB,
You need to be nice to basskisser, he suffers from FAS, and is self
medicating with pot.

Get the point, fool?

"John Smith" wrote in message news:oa8ic.10560$aQ6.865067@attbi_s51...
BK,
Here is your proof:

Of WHAT??? That you post wild allegations and assumptions, and present
them as fact? Hell, everybody here KNOWS you do that..now everybody
knows that you think that it is foolish to do so.

http://www.google.com/groups?safe=im...sser&lr=&hl=en


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"John Smith" wrote in message
news:zrZhc.5803$_L6.668305@attbi_s53...
Harry, There is no proof that you are not a serial murderer or a child
molester, but it would be foolish for anyone to suggest you were either.

That's odd, John Smith! YOU seem to think it's okay for YOU to post
wild allegations and assumptions about others here, and present them
as fact. Of course, then, when asked to show some form of evidence of
such, you quickly try to change the course of action. Need some proof
of your wild allegations?

From: John Smith )
Subject: Good News, Good News, Good News

View this article only
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-09 15:11:36 PST
Is that why you started smoking pot?

Have any evidence of me smoking pot? See? No proof, so, as YOU stated
above, it's foolish of you!

And this one, again proving that you are calling YOURSELF "foolish":

From: John Smith )
Subject: Pentagon Hires Comical Ali
View: Complete Thread (104 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-18 05:35:51 PST

The best part about Basskisser's argument is the definition he
provided told
him why Schnapps is not a whiskey, but he must have been too stoned to
be
able to read it.

Or this one. Once again, remember, you stated above that if there is
no proof of someone's allegations, then they are foolish for making
such:

From: John Smith )
Subject: OT Oh no! What next?
View: Complete Thread (151 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Date: 2004-04-14 10:11:50 PST

NOYB,
You need to be nice to basskisser, he suffers from FAS, and is self
medicating with pot.

Get the point, fool?