"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 05 May 2004 13:56:05 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 04 May 2004 16:39:20 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 04 May 2004 13:10:15 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .

There is NO law of the books that I have found yet, which gives
anyone
the right to shoot a neighbor's pet because they took a dump on
their
lawn.

There are thousands of townships in this country. What percentage
of
their
laws have you researched?

It only takes one to prove me wrong. And, unless it happens to be
in
the town where you live, it isn't applicable.


I'm still waiting.


Dave


"There is NO law of the books that I have found yet...."

You mentioned "books". Which have you read?


It's a metaphor Doug. Surely you know what they are.

Dave

OK. Let's fix what you said. "There is NO law recorded anywhere that I
have
found yet...."

Run with that.

Why play games with semantics Doug? In typical debates, when people
resort to nit-picking things like semantics, grammar, and spelling,
it's a significant indication that they've lost the debate.......

Dave


Me??? :-) You said "books". I questioned which ones. You said it was a
metaphor. We both know "on the books" means that a law exists, whether in
printed or electronic form. Who's nitpicking, Dave?

Let's try again. Regardless of its recorded form, what percentage of game
laws in this country have you personally read, in order to form your
opinion?

Are you saying that a pet is fair game?
If it happens on your property?
Chad Hansen