| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave Hall" wrote in message ... On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:46:30 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: Ok, if we stick to your binary view of property, you are either on your property or someone else's. When you leave your property, am I to assume that you are intending to damage someone else's property? Don't say stupid things. We're talking about a dog, not a person. Why not? The principle's the same. Don't be ridiculous. I define **** on my property as damage. It's my property, so my definition is the only one that's valid. The law would seem to disagree with you. Dave's been watching LA Law reruns. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| OT Hanoi John Kerry | General | |||
| offshore fishing | General | |||
| Where to find ramp stories? | General | |||
| Dealing with a boat fire, checking for a common cause | General | |||
| Repost from Merc group | General | |||