You're trying to debate with a socialist.
It's not possible to do so, they lack the intellect.
The best you can do is ridicule them.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:21:47 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:



Who said anything about SENDING the dog over. Pardon the pun, but
****
happens. It's not the dog's fault that you live in its toilet.


If your answer is "yes", then you must also
believe I have the right to roll my trash barrel down to HIS
property
and
dump it on his porch.

You are supposed to know better. A dog does not.

You're a piece of work, boy. The neighbor knows that he is doing wrong
by
letting the dog roam.

Does he?

Let's make this simple, Dave. There are only two kinds of property: Yours,
and someone else's. If the dog ****s or destroys things on your property,
that's fine. If the dog leaves your property and ****s/destroys, it's
doing
so on someone else's property. Now, please explain how any dog owner can
see
his dog leave his property and say "I didn't know it was going to mess up
someone else's property".



Here, when you go to get a license for your vermine,
you're given a brochure which explains the law regarding leashes.
Therefore,
if you let the dog roam the neighborhood, you are doing so with the
clear
intent of ****ing off your neighbors.

So you are of the opinion that every dog owner who's dog digs under
the fence or breaks off of his tether is plotting to "screw with the
neighbors"? Even those who simply "let them out", do not do so with
the intent of making your life miserable. That's an unfortunate
consequence.

See above. If the dog's not on your property, you KNOW it's on someone
else's. Since there are no other outcomes, it's safe to say that the owner
is either fully aware of what his dog is doing, or the owner is
monumentally
stupid and probably will never understand what it means to be responsible
pet owner.

On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 20:47:16 -0400, "Don"
wrote:

You're trying to debate with a socialist.
It's not possible to do so, they lack the intellect.
The best you can do is ridicule them.

Doug knows me well enough to know that I'm no socialist. You're
relatively new here. The only one who's being ridiculed is yourself
when you make obviously uninformed statements.

Doug may be somewhat off the mark, but he is at least intelligent
enough to research things. You would do well to follow that example
before running your fingers without your brain being fully engaged.

Dave

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 20:47:16 -0400, "Don"
wrote:

You're trying to debate with a socialist.
It's not possible to do so, they lack the intellect.
The best you can do is ridicule them.

Doug knows me well enough to know that I'm no socialist.

Yes you are.
Your collectivist nature is reflected in many of your posts.
The *pool/fence* post for example, and many others.
Combine that with the fact that you think anarchy = chaos and it's clear
that you're braindead.

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 01:13:23 -0400, "Don"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 20:47:16 -0400, "Don"
wrote:

You're trying to debate with a socialist.
It's not possible to do so, they lack the intellect.
The best you can do is ridicule them.

Doug knows me well enough to know that I'm no socialist.

Yes you are.
Your collectivist nature is reflected in many of your posts.

Do you think that the U.S. is a socialist state?

The *pool/fence* post for example, and many others.

Care to cite some examples?

Combine that with the fact that you think anarchy = chaos and it's clear
that you're braindead.


According to the American Heritage dictionary, the word "Anarchy" is
defined as:

1. Absence of governmental authority or law.

2. Disorder and confusion.

Now, most civilized people would equate disorder with chaos, and in
fact the dictionary further defines the word "Chaos" as:

1. Great disorder or confusion.

2. The disordered state held to have existed before the ordered
universe.

Now applying some simple logic; since anarchy is defined as disorder
and confusion, and chaos is defined as great disorder and confusion,
it is therefore a logical conclusion to conclude that Anarchy = Chaos.

I fully expect that you will now resort to making feeble claims about
my sources of information, since you seem unwilling to see the world
through anything but your narrow warped viewpoint.

Now go back to your dungeons and dragons game..... Your wisdom points
are fading.

Dave

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 01:13:23 -0400, "Don"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 20:47:16 -0400, "Don"
wrote:

You're trying to debate with a socialist.
It's not possible to do so, they lack the intellect.
The best you can do is ridicule them.

Doug knows me well enough to know that I'm no socialist.

Yes you are.
Your collectivist nature is reflected in many of your posts.

Do you think that the U.S. is a socialist state?

Pay attention Dave.
I said YOU are a socialist.
You've proven it true.

The *pool/fence* post for example, and many others.

Care to cite some examples?

Pay attention Dave.
Your stand on pool fences indicates you to be a socialist.

Combine that with the fact that you think anarchy = chaos and it's clear
that you're braindead.


According to the American Heritage dictionary, the word "Anarchy" is
defined as:

1. Absence of governmental authority or law.

Since you now know what anarchy means there is no ise for your tripe that
foolowed, thus, I shredded it.

Now applying some simple logic; since anarchy is defined as disorder
and confusion,

Nope.
Pat attention Dave.
Anarchy = absence of gov't.
(see your definition above)


and chaos is defined as great disorder and confusion,
it is therefore a logical conclusion to conclude that Anarchy = Chaos.

Then, as a socialist, you have concluded wrong, Dave.

I fully expect that you will now resort to making feeble claims about
my sources of information, since you seem unwilling to see the world
through anything but your narrow warped viewpoint.

My only intention, Dave, is to let your socialist words speak for
themselves.
You are cowardly, of very low intellect, overweight, spend way too much time
in front of the TEEVEE and you believe you have the right to tell others
what to do, in usenet.
In reality you go to a job at barely minimim wage and are ordered around all
day long, then you go home and drink yourself to sleep in front of the
TEEVEE.
You are pathetic, stupid, cowardly and deserve to be killed right away, for
you are a vermin and a threat to all you encounter.
I wouldn't be surprised if you are a criminal. Maybe even a slovenly child
molester or worse.

Now go back to your dungeons and dragons game..... Your wisdom points
are fading.

YAWN
Go get another brew Dave, there's another sit-com coming on shortly, idiot.