"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 23:05:17 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...
So you think that money makes one happy? You sound pretty shallow to
me.

And are you friendly to anyone on this board? It does not look like
it.

He's pretty friendly to me, even though we disagree on a few things. But
see....here's the deal: Neither he nor I say outrageous things that fly
in
the face of logic.


What? Most of your arguments thus far on this topic have been
outrageous.

It appears that way to you because you are viewing it from a socialists
perspective.
You have nothing of value so you thusly place no value on anyone elses
stuff.

Both of you guys are projecting the position that you are
justified in taking the law into your own hands, despite written law
to the contrary.

Now you're outright lying.
I am not talking about *taking the law into my own hands*, only you are.
Again, that is because you seem to be a socialist so everything to you is
*collective* in nature.
Rather than solving your problems, you would prefer the state to solve them
for you, that is why you continuously use the *law* reference.

You bemoan "inconsiderate" neighbors, who may be guilty of some degree
of negligence, but "retaliate" against them with an equally
inconsiderate response.

You're outright lying again, why?
Doug has tried to work things out with the neighbor, he has mentioned this
several times, yet the neighbor continues to disregard Dougs property
rights.
He didn't fly off the handle and kill the neighbors dog upon the first
infraction as you stated above.
So again, why are you lying your ass off?
Is it because it's the only way you can make an argument?

I'm sorry but you will never convince me that
you are morally or legally authorized to terminate the life of another
living being no matter what "damage" or inconvenience they may have
caused you. There are proper channels to seek out compensation or
retribution for these acts. That these proper channels are not "good
enough" for you is not our problem.

It seems to be a problem for you though.