Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Doug Kanter"
wrote: Hey....here's a question for little Dave: The law in most towns says that if you have a pool, you must have a fence with a gate that locks. Do you think that's nonsense, and that it should be up to the neighbors to keep their kids from drowning in your pool? This coincides with "attractive nuisance" laws in many communities. Usually these laws state anything on your property that can be considered "attractive" to children or adults of diminished reasoning capacity (Henry?), which presents a potential danger, must also have a resonable safegards to deter unauthorized access. My answer to this question falls in line with my previous statements. I don't necessarily believe in these laws per se (I'm sure their are individual cases where I will concede this point). I don't think I could easily reconcile the fact that an innocent child found dead in my pool as "his tough luck". Just because I believe in personal responsibily does not mean I am devoid of compassion. It's the difference between being right, and doing the right thing. Bob Dimond |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Hanoi John Kerry | General | |||
offshore fishing | General | |||
Where to find ramp stories? | General | |||
Dealing with a boat fire, checking for a common cause | General | |||
Repost from Merc group | General |